Abstract
Cystine stones are often highly resistant to shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), but it has been reported that cystine stones of “rough” morphology are actually quite susceptible to SWL. Based on the observation that rough cystine stones contain void regions that are visible by helical computed tomographic (CT) imaging, we hypothesized that the internal structure of cystine stones would correlate with the susceptibility of stones to SWL. Cystine stones with average diameters between 4 and 7 mm were scanned using micro and helical CT, classified morphologically according to published criteria, and broken in a research electrohydraulic lithotripter, with fragments sieved through a 2 mm mesh every 50 SWs. Stones with regions of low X-ray attenuation visible on helical CT required only 650 ± 312 SW/g for total comminution, while those that did not show CT-visible internal structure required 1,046 ± 307 SW/g (mean ± SD, P < 0.004). In addition, both average and minimum values for CT number (in Hounsfield units, HU) correlated with SW/g to comminution (P < 0.003 and P < 0.0003, respectively), and these relationships were independent of stone size. This study also confirmed the relationship between the morphological criteria of Bhatta et al. (J Urol 142:937–940, 1989) and cystine stone fragility: Rough stones required 609 ± 244 SW/g (n = 11), smooth stones 1,109 ± 308 SW/g (n = 8), and stones intermediate in morphology 869 ± 384 SW/g (n = 7; rough different from smooth, P < 0.005). In conclusion, cystine stones that appeared homogeneous by helical CT required 61% more SWs for comminution than did stones showing regions of low X-ray attenuation. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of using helical CT to identify cystine stones that will be susceptible to SWL.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Harada M, Ko ZR, Kamidono S (1992) Experience with extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for cystine calculi in 20 renal units. J Endourol 6:213–215
Martin X, Salas M, Labeeuw M, Pozet N, Gelet A, Dubernard JM (1991) Cystine stones: the impact of new treatment. Br J Urol 68:234–239
Kachel TA, Vijan SR, Dretler SP (1991) Endourological experience with cystine calculi and a treatment algorithm. J Urol 145:25–28
Katz G, Shapiro A, Lencovsky Z, Caine M, Pode D (1990) Place of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in management of cystine calculi. Urology 36:124–128
Hockley NM, Lingeman JE, Hutchinson RN (1989) Relative efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in the management of cystine calculi. J Endourol 3:273–285
Singer A, Das A (1989) Cystinuria: a review of the pathophysiology and management. J Urol 142:669–673
Hernandez-Graulau JM, Casteneda-Zuniga W, Hunter D, Hulbert JC (1989) Management of cystine nephrolithiasis by endourologic methods and shock-wave lithotripsy. Urology 34:139–143
Conort P, Leo JP, Richard F, Chatelain C (1989) Cystinic lithiasis and extracorporeal lithotripsy. Ann Urol (Paris) 23:253–254
Dretler SP (1988) Stone fragility—a new therapeutic distinction. J Urol 139:1124–1127
Newman DM, Lingeman JE, Mertz JH, Mosbaugh PG, Steele RE, Knapp PM Jr (1987) Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy. Urol Clin North Am 14:63–71
Ng CS, Streem SB (2001) Medical and surgical therapy of the cystine stone patient. Curr Opin Urol 11:353–358
Trinchieri A, Montanari E, Zanetti G, Lizzano R (2007) The impact of new technology in the treatment of cystine stones. Urol Res 35:129–132
Daudon M, Bader CA, Jungers P (1993) Urinary calculi: review of classification methods and correlations with etiology. Scanning Microsc 7:1081–1106
Bhatta KM, Prien EL Jr, Dretler SP (1989) Cystine calculi––rough and smooth: a new clinical distinction. J Urol 142:937–940
Thibert R, Dubuc B, Dufour M, Tawashi R (1993) Evaluation of the surface roughness of cystine stones using a visible laser diode scattering approach. Scanning Microsc 7:555–560
Miller NL, Lingeman JE (2007) Management of kidney stones. BMJ 334:468–472
Kim SC, Hatt EK, Lingeman JE, Nadler RB, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr (2005) Cystine: helical computerized tomography characterization of rough and smooth calculi in vitro. J Urol 174:1468–1471
Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Sommer AJ, Kim SC, Hatt EK, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, Williams JC Jr (2004) Nondestructive analysis of urinary calculi using micro computed tomography. BMC Urol 4:15
Williams JC Jr, Paterson RF, Kopecky KK, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA (2002) High resolution detection of internal structure of renal calculi by helical computerized tomography. J Urol 167:322–326
Saw KC, McAteer JA, Monga AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE, Williams JC Jr (2000) Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:329–332
Cleveland RO, Bailey MR, Fineberg NS, Hartenbaum B, Lokhandwalla M, McAteer JA, Sturtevant B (2000) Design and characterization of a research electrohydraulic lithotripter patterned after the Dornier HM3. Rev Sci Instrum 71:2514–2525
Zarse CA, Hameed TA, Jackson ME, Pishchalnikov YA, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr (2007) CT visible internal stone structure––but not Hounsfield unit value––of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res 35:201–206
McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr, Cleveland RO, Van Cauwelaert J, Bailey MR, Lifshitz DA, Evan AP (2005) Ultracal-30 gypsum artificial stones for research on the mechanisms of stone breakage in shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 33:429–434
Kachelriess M, Sourbelle K, Kalender WA (2006) Empirical cupping correction: a first-order raw data precorrection for cone-beam computed tomography. Med Phys 33:1269–1274
Williams JC Jr, Zarse CA, Jackson ME, Lingeman JE, McAteer JA (2007) Using helical CT to predict stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). In: Evan AP, Lingeman JE, Williams JC Jr (eds) Renal stone disease: proceedings of the 1st international urolithiasis research symposium. American Institute of Physics, Melville
Krishnamurthy MS, Ferucci PG, Sankey N, Chandhoke PS (2005) Is stone radiodensity a useful parameter for predicting outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for stones ≤ 2 cm? (Discussion 9) Int Braz J Urol 31:3–8
Cleveland RO, Anglade R, Babayan RK (2004) Effect of stone motion on in vitro comminution efficiency of a Storz Modulith SLX. J Endourol 18:629–633
Pishchalnikov YA, Neucks JS, VonDerHaar RJ, Pishchalnikova IV, Williams JC Jr, McAteer JA (2006) Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol 176:2706–2710
Sapozhnikov OA, Maxwell AD, MacConaghy B, Bailey MR (2007) A mechanistic analysis of stone fracture in lithotripsy. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1190–1202
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Molly Jackson for help with the stone fragmentation experiments, and to Dr. Robert Nadler and Dr. Edwin Prien for donating cystine stones from their collections. This work was supported by NIH R01 DK59933 and P01 DK43881.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, S.C., Burns, E.K., Lingeman, J.E. et al. Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 35, 319–324 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-007-0117-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-007-0117-1