Skip to main content
Log in

Direct ureteric length measurement from intravenous pyelography: does height represent ureteric length?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ureteric length is the most important factor for determining the ideal length of a ureteric stent. In most of the literature, ureteric length is estimated according to a patient’s height. We investigated the reliability of a patient’s height as a measure of ureteric length. We measured the actual length of the ureteric trace (ALUT) and the linear distance (LD) from the ureterorenal junction to the ureterovesical junction by intravenous pyelography (IVP), using a 15 min view. A total of 203 patients (100 men, 103 women, 406 ureters) with normal findings were studied, and ALUT, LD and height were measured. The mean patient height was 164.3±8.3(SD) cm. Mean ALUTs of the right and left ureters were 23.4±1.9 cm and 24.4±2.0 cm, respectively, and the mean LDs of the right and left ureters were 22.1±1.9 cm and 22.9±2.0 cm, respectively. Height was significantly correlated with the ALUTs of both sides, but these were not linear (r2=0.024 right, 0.059 left). However, LD showed significant linear correlations with the ALUTs of both sides (r2=0.879 right, 0.884 left). Two formulas to estimate the ALUT from LD were suggested: right ALUT=0.94×right LD+2.6, left ALUT=0.96×left LD+2.4. Our results demonstrated that patient height does not provide a reliable estimate of ureteric length. LD by IVP is preferable to patient height when estimating the ureteric length.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laverson PL, Hankins GD, Quirk JG (1984) Ureteral obstruction during pregnancy. J Urol 131: 327

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lang EK, Lanasa JA, Garrett J, Stripling J, Palomar J (1979) The management of urinary fistulas and strictures with percutaneous ureteral stent catheters. J Urol 122: 736

    Google Scholar 

  3. LeRoy AJ, Williams HJJr, Segura JW, Patterson DE, Benson RCJr (1986) Indwelling ureteral stents: percutaneous management of complications. Radiology 158: 219

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ansong K, Khashu B, Lee WJ, Smith AD (1985) Prophylactic use of ureteral stent in iatrogenic injuries to the ureter. Urology 26: 45

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ball AJ, Gingell JC, Carter SS, Smith PJ (1983) The indwelling ureteric splint: the Bristol experience. Br J Urol 55: 622

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pryor JL, Jenkins AD (1990) Use of double-pigtail stents in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 143: 475

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saltzman B (1988) Ureteral stents: indications, variations, and complications. Urol Clin North Am 15: 481

    Google Scholar 

  8. Warren JW, Damron D, Tenney JH, Hoopes JM, Deforge B, Muncie HLJr (1987) Fever, bacteremia, and death as complications of bacteriuria in women with long term urethral catheters. J Infect Dis 155: 1151

    Google Scholar 

  9. Warren JW, Muncie HLJr, Hall-Craggs M (1988) Acute pyelonephritis associated with bacteriuria during long-term catheterization: a prospective clinicopathological study. J Infect Dis 158: 1341

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warren JW, Muncie HLJr, Bergquist EJ, Hoopes JM (1982) Sequelae and management of urinary tract infection in the patient requiring chronic catheterization. J Urol 125: 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Platt R, Polk BF, Murdock B (1982) Mortality associated with nosocomial urinary tract infection. N Engl J Med 307: 637

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stamm WE (1975) Guidelines for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Ann Intern Med 82: 386

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wills MI, Gilbert HW Chadwick DJ, Harrison SC (1991) Which ureteric stent length? Br J Urol 68: 440

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pilcher JM, Patel U (2002) Choosing the correct length of ureteric stent: a formula based on the patient’s height compared with direct ureteric measurement. Clin Radiol 57: 59

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pollack HM, Banner MP (1981) Percutaneous nephrostomy and related pyeloureteral manipulative technique. Urol Radiol 2: 147

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breau RH, Norman RW (2001) Optimal prevention and management of proximal ureteral stent migration and remigration. J Urol 166: 890

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bhudhikanok GS, Wang MC, Eckert K, Matkin C, Marcus R, Bachrach LK (1996) Differences in bone mineral in young Asian and Caucasian Americans may reflect differences in bone size. J Bone Miner Res 11: 1545

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyeon Hoe Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paick, S.H., Park, H.K., Byun, SS. et al. Direct ureteric length measurement from intravenous pyelography: does height represent ureteric length?. Urol Res 33, 199–202 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-004-0461-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-004-0461-3

Keywords

Navigation