Erratum to: J Mol Evol (2010) 71:219–230 DOI 10.1007/s00239-010-9379-2

Figure legends are erroneously switched around in the published article. The legend to Fig. 2 in the paper actually refers to Fig. 5, while the legend to Fig. 5 in the paper is the legend to Fig. 2.

Correct figures with the subsequent legends are given overleaf.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Alignment of P. marinus AIM1 βγ-crystallin motifs. The AIM1 βγ-crystallin motifs found in the P. marinus (Pm) genome assembly are aligned with those of the D. rerio (Dr) AIM1 protein and with the first two βγ-crystallin motifs of human (Hs) AIM1. The alignment is split in the odd and even motifs. Structurally important residues are indicated as in Fig. 1

Fig. 5
figure 5

Alignment of B. floridae βγ-crystallin related sequences. The predicted protein sequences of B. floridae Bf-bg1, -bg2, -bg3 and -bg4 (acc.nr. FE565747, BW704196 and BW723025) are aligned with the C. intestinalis βγ-crystallin (Ci_bg) and the D. rerio βB2- (Dr_bB2) and γSa-crystallin (Dr_gSa). The motifs are indicated as M followed by the number. Structurally important residues are indicated as in Fig. 1; calcium-binding residues are in grey. The sequence in italics in Bf-bg3 M1 was derived from the genomic sequence; the C-terminal extensions of Bf-bg1 and Bf-bg2 are shown below the alignment. The # indicates the position of the HVNPANT insert in Bf-bg1 M2 and & that of PPSNM in Bf-bg1 M4. The alignment is split in the odd and even motifs