Abstract
Since the identification of the Standard Coding Table as a “universal” method to translate genetic information into amino acids, exceptions to this rule have been reported, and to date there are nearly 20 alternative genetic coding tables deployed by either nuclear genomes or organelles of organisms. Why are these codes still in use and why are new codon reassignments occurring? This present study aims to provide a new method to address these questions and to analyze whether these alternative codes present any advantages or disadvantages to the organisms or organelles in terms of robustness to error. We show that two of the alternative coding tables, The Ciliate, Dasycladacean and Hexamita Nuclear Code (CDH) and The Flatworm Mitochondrial Code (FMC), exhibit an advantage, while others such as The Yeast Mitochondrial Code (YMC) are at a significant disadvantage. We propose that the Standard Code is likely to have emerged as a “local minimum” and that the “coding landscape” is still being searched for a “global” minimum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ardell DH (1998) On error minimization in a sequential origin of the standard genetic code. J Mol Evol 47:1–13
Crick FHC (1968) The origin of the genetic code. J Mol Biol 38:367−379
Freeland SJ, Knight RD, Landweber LF, Hurst LD (2000) Early fixation of an optimal genetic code. Mol Biol Evol 17:511–518
Gultepe E, Kurnaz ML (2005) Monte Carlo simulation and statistical analysis of genetic information coding. Physica A 357:525–533
Henikoff S, Henikoff JG (1992) Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:10915–10919
Itzkovitz S, Alon U (2007) The genetic code is nearly optimal for allowing additional information within protein coding sequences. Genome Res 17:405–412
Judson OP, Haydon D (1999) The genetic code: what is it good for? an analysis of the effects of selection pressures on genetic codes. J Mol Evol 49:539–550
Kawaguchi Y, Honda H, Taniguichi-Morimura J, Iwasaki S (1989) The codon CUG is read as serine in an asporogenic yeast Candida cylindacea. Nature 341:164–166
Klobutcher LA, Farabaugh PJ (2002) Shifty ciliates: frequent programmed translational frameshifting in euplotids. Cell 111:763–766
Knight RD, Freeland SJ, Landweber LF (2001) Rewiring the keyboard: evolvability of the genetic code. Nat Rev Genet 2:49–58
Kurnaz ML, Bilgin T, Aksan Kurnaz I (2008) A statistical analysis of the robustness of alternate genetic coding tables. Int J Mol Sci 9:679–697
Lenski RE, Barrick JE, Ofria C (2006) Balancing robustness and evolvability. PLoS Biol 4:e428
Liu X, Liu D, Qi J, Zheng WM (2002) Simplified amino acid alphabets based on deviation of conditional probability from random background. Phys Rev E 66:021906
Lozupone CA, Knight RD, Landweber LF (2001) The molecular basis of nuclear genetic code change in ciliates. Curr Biol 11:65–74
Maeshiro T, Kimora M (1998) The role of robustness and changeability on the origin and evolution of genetic codes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 95:5088–5093
Marquez R, Smit S, Knight R (2005) Do universal codon-usage patterns minimize the effects of mutation and translation error? Genome Biol 6:R91
Mehl RA, Anderson JC, Santoro SW, Wang L, Martin AB, King DS, Horn DM, Schultz PG (2003) Generation of a bacterium with a 21 amino acid genetic code. J Am Chem Soc 125:935–939
Miyazawa S, Jernigan RL (1996) Residue–residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. J Mol Biol 256:623–644
Novozhilov AS, Wolf YI, Koonin EV (2007) Evolution of the genetic code: partial optimization of a random code for robustness to translation error in a rugged fitness landscape. Biol Direct 2:24
Ohama T, Suzuki T, Mori M, Osawa S, Ueda T, Watanabe K, Nakase T (1993) Non-universal decoding of the leucine codon CUG in several Candida species. Nucleic Acids Res 21:4039–4045
Ring KL, Cavalcanti RO (2008) Consequences of stop codon reassignment on protein evolution in ciliates with alternative genetic codes. Mol Biol Evol 25:179–186
Santos MA, Tuite MF (1995) The CUG codon is decoded in vivo as serine and not leucine in Candida albicans. Nucleic Acids Res 23:1481–1486
Santos MA, Cheesman C, Costa V, Moradas-Ferreira P, Tuite MF (1999) Selective advantages created by codon ambiguity allowed for the evolution of an alternative genetic code in Candida spp. Mol Microbiol 31:937–947
Sella G, Ardell DH (2006) The coevolution of genes and genetic codes: Crick’s frozen accident revisited. J Mol Evol 63:297–313
Sengupta S, Higgs PG (2005) A unified model of codon reassignment in alternative genetic codes. Genetics 170:831–840
Sengupta S, Yang X, Higgs PG (2007) The mechanisms of codon reassignments in mitochondrial genetic codes. J Mol Evol 64:662–688
Silva RM, Miranda I, Moura G, Santos MA (2004) Yeast as a model organism for studying the evolution of non-standard genetic codes. Genomics Proteomics 3:35–46
Stoltzfus A, Yampolsky LY (2007) Amino acid exchangeability and the adaptive code hypothesis. J Mol Evol 65:456–462
Tan Z, Blacklow SC, Cornish VW, Forster AC (2005) De novo genetic codes and pure translation display. Methods 36:279–290
van der Gulik PTS. Three phases in the evolution of the standard genetic code: how translation could get started. Arxiv0711.0700
Weberndorfer MG (2002) Computational models of the genetic code evolution based on empirical potentials. PhD Dissertation, Universitaet Wien
Weberndorfer G, Hofacker IL, Stadler PF (2003) On the evolution of primitive genetic codes. Orig Life Evol Biosphere 33(4–5):491–514
Zipperlen P, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Martinez-Campos M, Ahringer J (2001) Roles for 147 embryonic lethal genes on C. elegans chromosome I identified by RNA interference and video microscopy. EMBO J 20(15):3984–3992
Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L (1965) Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ (eds) Evolving genes and proteins. Academic Press, New York
Acknowledgment
This work was supported in part by Bogazici University Research Fund (MLK); IAK is a TUBA GEBIP awardee (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kurnaz, M.L., Bilgin, T. & Kurnaz, I.A. Certain Non-Standard Coding Tables Appear to be More Robust to Error Than the Standard Genetic Code. J Mol Evol 70, 13–28 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-009-9303-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00239-009-9303-9