Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microsurgery courses vs continuous microsurgery laboratory training: an Italian experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Microsurgical techniques are an important part of clinical and experimental research. In this paper, we present our survey of Italian microsurgery training and our experience of the importance of a free access microsurgical laboratory.

Methods

A cross-sectional observational study was performed by administering a questionnaire regarding the current situation about microsurgical training in Italian Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery residency programs. A case–control study was performed on 12 residents divided into four groups of attendance to the microlaboratory.

Results

Two hundred and seventy-six trainees replied to the questionnaire, representing 94.7% of residents enrolled in the Italian Society of Plastic, Reconstructive-Regenerative and Aesthetic Surgery (SICPRE). Only 25% of Italian residency locations own an environment dedicated to microsurgical training. All residents agreed to the importance of a free access microsurgical laboratory in their resident program. We verify a higher improvement in microsurgical anastomosis in resident who performed a more assiduous attendance to microsurgical laboratory.

Conclusions

Microsurgical skills are fundamental in becoming a complete plastic surgery specialist. It is important to invest in a microsurgical training in all residency programs. We consider that our experience could be useful to spur other residency institutions to invest in microsurgical training and maybe to create a microsurgical training network.

Level of evidence: Not gradable

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Karam MD, Pedowitz RA, Natividad H, Murray J, Marsh JL (2013) Current and future use of surgical skills training laboratories in orthopaedic resident education: a national survey. J Bone Jt Surg 95(1). https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00177

  2. Mazen AJ, Becker F, Palmes D, Stöppeler S, Bahde R, Kebschull L, Spiegel H, Hölzen JP (2021) Microsurgical training course for clinicians and scientists: a 10-year experience at the Münster University Hospital uratli. BMC Med Educ 21:295. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02737-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein I, Steger U, Timmermann W, Thiede A, Gassel HJ (2003) Microsurgical training course for clinicians and scientists at a German University hospital: a 10-year experience. Microsurgery 23(5):461–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shurey S, Akelina Y, Legagneux J, Malzone G, Jiga L, Ghanem AM (2014) The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons. Arch Plast Surg 41(03):201–208

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Green CJ (1987) Microsurgery in the clinic and laboratory. Lab Anim 21(01):1–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ortiz R, Sood RF, Wilkens S, Gottlieb R, Chen NC, Eberlin KR (2019) Longitudinal microsurgery laboratory training during hand surgery fellowship. J Reconstr Microsurg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1691784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tos P, Pedrazzini A (2015) Manuale di Microchirurgia dalle tecniche di base a quelle avanzate, ed. Società Italiana di Microchirurgia, 1st edition, ISBN: 978–88–97162–41–4 Timeo Editore, Bologna

  8. Alzakri A, Al-Rajeh M, Liverneaux PA, Facca S (2014) État des lieux de l’enseignement des techniques microchirurgicales en France et à l’étranger [Courses in microsurgical techniques in France and abroad]. Chir Main 33(3):219–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.main.2014.03.006. (French)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirche C, Megerle K, Heitmann C et al (2020) Konsensus der Deutschsprachigen Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Mikrochirurgie der peripheren Nerven und Gefäße (DAM) für Mindeststandards mikrochirurgischer Trainings- und Übungskurse zur Vergabe eines Qualitätssiegels [Consensus of the German-Speaking Society for Microsurgery of Peripheral Nerves and Vessels (DAM) on minimum standards for microsurgical training courses and accreditation - Minimum Standards for Microsurgical Training Courses and Accreditation]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 52(2):135–139. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1017-3688. (German)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Paladino JR, Gasteratos K, Akelina Y, Marshall B, Papazoglou LG, Strauch RJ (2021) The benefits of expert instruction in microsurgery courses. J Reconstr Microsurg 37(2):143–153. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Volovici V, Dammers R, Lawton MT, Dirven CMF, Ketelaar T, Lanzino G, Zamfirescu DG (2019) The flower petal training system in microsurgery: validation of a training model using a randomized controlled trial. Ann Plast Surg 83(6):697–701. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Oliveira MM, Quittes L, Costa PHV et al (2022) Computer vision coaching microsurgical laboratory training: PRIME (Proficiency Index in Microsurgical Education) proof of concept. Neurosurg Rev 45(2):1601–1606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01663-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dave A, Singhal M, Tiwari R, Chauhan S, De M (2022) Effectiveness of a microsurgery training program using a chicken wing model. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 56(4):191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/2000656X.2021.1953043

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Atkins JL, Kalu PU, Lannon DA, Green CJ, Butler PE (2005) Training in microsurgical skills: does course-based learning deliver? Micro- surgery 25(06):481–485

    Google Scholar 

  15. Perez-Abadia G, Janko M, Pindur L et al (2017) Frankfurt microsurgery course: the first 175 trainees. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 43(03):377–386

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ali S (2018) Basic microvascular anastomosis simulation hub microsur- gery course: an innovative competency-based approach to micro- surgical training for early year’s plastic surgery trainees. Ann Plast Surg 80(04):314–315

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsuda S, Mohsin A, Jones D (2015) Financing a simulation center. Surg Clin North Am 95(4):791–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2015.03.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Khachatryan A, Arakelyan G, Tevosyan A et al (2021) How to organize affordable microsurgical training laboratory: optimal price-quality solution. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 9(9):e3791. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lakhiani C, Fisher SM, Janhofer DE, Song DH (2018) Ergonomics in microsurgery. J Surg Oncol 118(5):840–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ahluwalia T, Gidwani S, Douglass K (2021) Effectiveness of remote practical boards and telesimulation for the evaluation of emergency medicine trainees in India. AEM Educ Train 5(4):e10686. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10686

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Hayden EM, Khatri A, Kelly HR, Yager PH, Salazar GM (2018) Mannequin-based telesimulation: increasing access to simulation-based education. Acad Emerg Med 25(2):144–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.13299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nelsen BR, Chen YK, Lasic M, Bader AM, Arriaga AF (2020) Advances in anesthesia education: increasing access and collaboration in medical education, from E-learning to telesimulation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 33(6):800–807. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors have nothing to disclose. No funding was received for this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico De Maria.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

No ethical approval was necessary due to the observational nature of the study. This article does not contain any clinical studies involving human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent to participate

The participants consented to participate and share their data.

Competing interests

Federico De Maria, Valentina Pinto, Massimo Pinelli, Filippo Taccioli, Claudio Gio Francesco Blessent, Caterina Marra, Gian Piero Mantovani, and Giorgio De Santis declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Federico De Maria and Valentina Pinto contributed equally to the study and should be accounted as first authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Maria, F., Pinto, V., Pinelli, M. et al. Microsurgery courses vs continuous microsurgery laboratory training: an Italian experience. Eur J Plast Surg 46, 1383–1388 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02132-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02132-7

Keywords

Navigation