Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective single center study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Due to fluctuations in contemporary trends for breast reconstruction, we aimed to perform a comparative analysis to assess postoperative outcomes and complications of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) with tissue expander before and over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Consecutive adult women undergoing total mastectomy and immediate two-stage IBBR with tissue expanders between September 2018 and May 2021 were included. Two groups were compared: reconstructions performed before COVID-19 (pre-pandemic) and reconstructions performed after the implementation of the COVID-19 policies at our institution. We compared postoperative complications and perioperative outcomes (e.g., length of stay, expander volume, time for definitive implant) between groups.

Results

One hundred fourteen patients representing 192 reconstructions with expanders were included. One-hundred twenty-eight (66.6%) were performed before the COVID-19 pandemic, while 64 (33.3%) were performed during the pandemic. A larger proportion of reconstructions performed during the pre-pandemic era had a prolonged length of stay (≥ 2 days) compared to reconstructions performed during the COVID-19 pandemic (43% versus 9.4%, p < .001). The median time from immediate IBBR to initiate outpatient expansions (22 days [IQR, 15–34]; p = 0.45) and to conclude outpatient expansion was (52 days [IQR, 40–76]; p = 0.85) comparable between groups. The rates of 30-day complications and rates of complications during the expansion period were similar between groups.

Conclusion

Due to adjustments in perioperative management and the implementation of institutional and state recommendations, IBBR with tissue expander during the COVID-19 pandemic exhibited a reduced length of stay compared to pre-pandemic reconstructions without increased morbidity.

Level of evidence: Level IV, Risk/Prognostic

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Raw data were generated at the URMC. Derived data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author O.J.M. on request.

References

  1. Rubenstein RN, Stern CS, Plotsker EL et al (2022) Effects of COVID-19 on mastectomy and breast reconstruction rates: a national surgical sample. J Surg Oncol 126(2):205–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26889

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cucinotta D, Vanelli M (2020) WHO declares COVID-19 a pandemic. Acta Biomed 91(1):157–160. https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v91i1.9397

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz JR, Moran MS, Isakoff SJ et al (2020) Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. the COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat 181(3):487–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-020-05644-z

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Brindle ME, Gawande A (2020) Managing COVID-19 in surgical systems. Ann Surg 272(1):e1–e2. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Keane AM, Keane GC, Skolnick GB et al (2023) Immediate post-mastectomy implant-based breast reconstruction: an outpatient procedure? Plast Reconstr Surg 152(1):1e–11e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jallali N, Hunter JE, Henry FP et al (2020) The feasibility and safety of immediate breast reconstruction in the COVID-19 era. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 73(11):1917–1923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2020.08.044

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Escandón JM, Nazerali R, Ciudad P et al (2022) Minimally invasive harvest of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot 18(6):e2446. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bracaglia R, D’Ettorre M, Gentileschi S, Tambasco D (2014) Was the surgeon a satisfactory informant? How to minimize room for claims. Aesthetic Surg J 34(4):632–635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090820X14528504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gentileschi S, Caretto AA, Tagliaferri L, Salgarello M, Peris K (2020) Skin cancer plastic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Eur J Surg Oncol 46(6):1194–1195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2020.04.048

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sbitany H, Sandeen SN, Amalfi AN, Davenport MS, Langstein HN (2009) Acellular dermis-assisted prosthetic breast reconstruction versus complete submuscular coverage: a head-to-head comparison of outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1735–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Escandón JM, Ali-Khan S, Christiano JG et al (2022) Simultaneous fat grafting during tissue expander-to-implant exchange: a propensity score-matched analysis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-022-03152-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Escandón JM, Sweitzer K, Christiano JG et al (2022) Subpectoral versus prepectoral two-stage breast reconstruction: a propensity score-matched analysis of 30-day morbidity and long-term outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 76:76–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.10.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calderon T, Skibba KE, Hansen T, Amalfi A, Chen E (2022) Safety of breast reconstruction using inferiorly based dermal flap for the ptotic breast. Ann Plast Surg 88(3 Suppl 3):S156–S162. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sweitzer K, Patel AU, Wingate NA, Milek D, Escandon J, Christiano JG (2023) Outpatient model for reduced utilization of narcotics following breast reduction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 77:18–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2022.11.065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lotan AM, Tongson KC, Police AM, Dec W (2020) Mastectomy incision design to optimize aesthetic outcomes in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg - Glob Open 8(9):e3086. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Escandón JM, Milek D, Christiano JG, Chen E, Langstein HN, Manrique OJ (2022) Impact of intraoperative expansion with air and outcomes in first stage implant-based breast reconstruction: a propensity-matched analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 10(10 Suppl):89. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GOX.0000898776.63214.ea

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. R Core Development Team. R Core Team (2021) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.0) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/. Published online 2021. https://cran.r-project.org

  18. Hemal K, Boyd CJ, Bekisz JM, Salibian AA, Choi M, Karp NS (2021) Breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surgery Glob Open 9(9):e3852. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chow AL, Luthringer MM, Van Kouwenberg EA, Agag RL, Sinkin JC (2023) Same-day mastectomy and immediate prosthetic breast reconstruction: a twelve-year analysis of a national database and early postoperative outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000010348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sun P, Luan F, Xu D, Cao R, Cai X (2021) Breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Medicine (Baltimore) 100(33):e26978. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000026978

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Chi D, Chen AD, Dorante MI, Lee BT, Sacks JM (2021) Plastic surgery in the time of COVID-19. J Reconstr Microsurg 37(2):124–131. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tokita HK, Polanco TO, Shamsunder MG et al (2019) Non-narcotic perioperative pain management in prosthetic breast reconstruction during an opioid crisis: a systematic review of paravertebral blocks. Plast Reconstr Surgery Glob Open 7(6):e2299. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shah A, Rowlands M, Krishnan N, Patel A, Ott-Young A (2015) Thoracic intercostal nerve blocks reduce opioid consumption and length of stay in patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(5):584e–591e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001717

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Deng JZ, Chan JS, Potter AL et al (2022) The risk of postoperative complications after major elective surgery in active or resolved COVID-19 in the United States. Ann Surg 275(2):242–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gupta S, Goil P, Mohammad A, Escandón JM (2022) Mucormycosis management in COVID-19 Era: is immediate surgical debridement and reconstruction the answer? Arch Plast Surg 49(3):397–404. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748654

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gulinac M, Novakov IP, Antovic S, Velikova T (2021) Surgical complications in COVID-19 patients in the setting of moderate to severe disease. World J Gastrointest Surg 13(8):788–795. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v13.i8.788

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Prasad NK, Lake R, Englum BR et al (2022) Increased complications in patients who test COVID-19 positive after elective surgery and implications for pre and postoperative screening. Am J Surg 223(2):380–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Faulkner HR, Coopey SB, Liao EC, Specht M, Smith BL, Colwell AS (2022) The safety of performing breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic. Breast Cancer 29(2):242–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-021-01304-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chan SLS, Mok JWL (2022) Late seroma in breast implants: a Coronavirus disease 2019 phenomenon? Arch Plast Surg 49(5):611–613. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756295

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Martínez Núñez P, Pérez González M, Juárez CÁ (2022) Late seroma of the breast in association with COVID-19 infection: two case reports. Eur J Plast Surg 45(4):671–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01898-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weitgasser L, Mahrhofer M, Schoeller T (2021) Potential immune response to breast implants after immunization with COVID-19 vaccines. Breast 59:76–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2021.06.002

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gentileschi S, Bracaglia R, Garganese G et al (2013) Immediate definitive prosthetic reconstruction in patients with ptotic breasts. Ann Plast Surg 70(2):144–148. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182367bfd

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar J. Manrique.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The local ethics committee approved this study (IRB#: STUDY00006499).

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interests or commercial associations to disclose related to this study.

Patient Consent Statement

Written informed consent for publication of their details was obtained from the patient/study participant/parent/guardian/next of kin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Presentation

This article has not been presented in a national or international meeting.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Escandón, J.M., Aristizábal, A., Langstein, H.N. et al. Immediate two-stage implant-based breast reconstruction during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective single center study. Eur J Plast Surg 46, 1081–1092 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02115-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-023-02115-8

Keywords

Navigation