Skip to main content
Log in

The aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective evaluation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty is a growing area of research; and researchers have developed various validated tools to evaluate postoperative outcomes. It remains a key measure of surgical success with functional and aesthetic outcomes. The current study aims to assess patient satisfaction with cosmetic and functional surgical outcomes following rhinoplasty in the Saudi population via the Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS).

Methods

This study was conducted in a cross-sectional design with an electronic survey among adult patients 6 to 12 months after rhinoplasty in a private center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The SCHNOS assessment tool was used in this study, a simple, valid, and reliable method for evaluating the success of cosmetic rhinoplasty.

Results

A total of 205 patients participated in the current study. Results showed significant differences in the SCHNOS-O subscale in those aged > 35 years (median = 10.0, IQR = 0.0–27.5) being significantly lower than those of the other age categories. Furthermore, divorced participants scored higher than those married (median = 47.5, IQR = 45.0–60.0). Finally, participants with the highest household income scored lower nasal obstruction scores (median = 30.0, IQR = 10.0–40.0) than those in the lowest income category.

Conclusions

Saudi patients above the age of 35 reported higher satisfaction levels with the surgical outcome following rhinoplasty. Divorced patients were more likely to be dissatisfied with the surgical outcome. Compared to patients in other parts of the Kingdom, patients in the Central region had fewer nasal obstruction symptoms and better cosmetic results.

Level of evidence: Not ratable

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arima LM, Velasco LC, Tiago RS (2012) Influence of age on rhinoplasty outcomes evaluation: a preliminary study. Aesthetic Plast Surg 36(2):248–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-011-9805-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alharethy SE (2017) Trends and demographic characteristics of Saudi cosmetic surgery patients. Saudi Med J 38(7):738–741. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.7.18528

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis RE (2006) Rhinoplasty and concepts of facial beauty. Facial Plast Surg: FPS 22(3):198–203. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-950178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalaaji A, Dreyer S, Schnegg J, Sanosyan L, Radovic T, Maric I (2019) Assessment of rhinoplasty outcomes with FACE-Q rhinoplasty module: Norwegian linguistic validation and clinical application in 243 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 7(9):e2448. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002448

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Khansa I, Khansa L, Pearson GD (2016) Patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: a social media analysis. Aesthet Surg J 36(1):NP1–NP5. https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjv095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zojaji R, Sobhani E, Keshavarzmanesh M, Dehghan P, Meshkat M (2019) The association between facial proportions and patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty: a prospective study. Plast Surg (Oakville, Ont.) 27(2):167–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/2292550319826097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. SenaEsteves S, Gonçalves Ferreira M, Carvalho Almeida J, Abrunhosa J, Almeida E, Sousa C (2017) Evaluation of aesthetic and functional outcomes in rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective study. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 83(5):552–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjorl.2016.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kotzampasakis D, Mantalos P, Kotzampasakis S, Danias N, Nikolopoulos T (2017) Assessment of aesthetic results of 100 patients who underwent rhinoplasty-rhinoplasty outcome evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(9):e1404. https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. AlHarethy S, Al-Angari SS, Syouri F, Islam T, Jang YJ (2017) Assessment of satisfaction based on age and gender in functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(7):2809–2812. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4566-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hellings PW, NolstTrenité GJ (2007) Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. Laryngoscope 117(6):985–989. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLG.0b013e31804f8152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sözen T, Tahir E, Cabbarzade C, Kuşçu O (2017) Factors determining patient satisfaction in rhinoplasty: analysis of 506 cases with rhinoplasty outcome evaluation. Acta Medica 48(4):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  12. Howldar S, Fida A, Allinjawi O, Zaqzoog F, Qurban G (2018) Long-term cosmetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty: a cross sectional study of patients’ satisfaction. Saudi J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 20(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pereira Filho GDA, Valiati AA, Minuzzi ACS, Cunha TF, Pires JA, Garcia AC, Ely PB (2011) Assessment of long-term patient satisfaction after rhinoplasty performed at the Plastic Surgery Department of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. Rev Bras Cir Plást 26:618–623

  14. DeRosa J (2016) Does the nose have a function beyond breathing? Facial Plast Surg: FPS 32(1):9–16. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1570327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nguyen PS, Mazzola RF (2014) Histoire de la rhinoplastie esthétique [History of aesthetic rhinoplasty]. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 59(6):374–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2014.07.007

  16. Barone M, Cogliandro A, Di Stefano N, Tambone V, Persichetti P (2017) A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures after rhinoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274(4):1807–1811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4359-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moubayed SP, Ioannidis J, Saltychev M, Most SP (2018) The 10-item Standardized Cosmesis and Health Nasal Outcomes Survey (SCHNOS) for functional and cosmetic rhinoplasty. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 20(1):37–42. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamafacial.2017.1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faisal M. Obeid.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate Before filling out the questionnaire, all participants consented to participate in this study.

Ethical approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Institutional Review Board and Research Ethics Committee.

Conflict of interest

Faisal M Obeid, Hatan Mortada, Dahna Alkahtani, Lujain Bandar Alotaibi, Othillah Maher Moazin, Waiel A Daghistani, Faris A Aldaghri, and Khalid Arab declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obeid, F.M., Mortada, H., Alkahtani, D. et al. The aesthetic and functional outcomes of rhinoplasty surgery: a prospective evaluation. Eur J Plast Surg 46, 189–196 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-022-02005-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-022-02005-5

Keywords

Navigation