Abstract
Background
In breast reconstruction, augmenting the blood supply to the abdominal flap decreases the risk of adverse effects. This technique is utilized in patients with risk factors such as smoking, obesity, and a history of chest wall irradiation. A surgeon may opt to use procedures such as free bipedicled flaps, vascular delay, or conventional bipedicled transverse rectus abdominus myocutaneous flaps. The free bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap is the best option; however, information on the reliability of bipedicled DIEP compared to that of unipedicled flaps is lacking. We aimed to determine if there was a significant difference in complication rates between bipedicled and unipedicled DIEP flaps.
Methods
Electronic search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and Scopus databases was performed. After screening, data were extracted based on the donor site, recipient site, and adverse effects. Descriptive statistics were generated for all pooled data. A meta-analysis was performed to determine the relative risk (RR) ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using a random-effects model.
Results
Our search yielded 19 unrelated studies of 920 bipedicled DIEP flaps that met the inclusion criteria and were included. The meta-analysis conducted on five papers showed that the risk of fat necrosis was significantly higher in unipedicled flaps than in bipedicled flaps (RR 0.30 [95% CI 0.19–0.48]; P < 0.00001). There was no significant difference in the risk of other complications between the two flaps. However, descriptive analysis appeared to favor bipedicled DIEP flap reconstruction.
Conclusions
Bipedicled DIEP flap reconstruction is safe and reliable, especially in patients with midline abdominal scars, insufficient abdominal fat, and contralateral large breasts.
Level of Evidence: Not gradable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yan XQ et al (2007) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction: experience with 43 flaps. Chin Med J (Engl) 120(5):380–384
Hernandez Rosa J et al (2017) Use of both antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels in the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(1):47–53
DellaCroce FJ, Sullivan SK, Trahan C (2011) Stacked deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: a review of 110 flaps in 55 cases over 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(3):1093–1099
Blondeel PN, Boeckx WD (1994) Refinements in free flap breast reconstruction: the free bilateral deep inferior epigastric perforator flap anastomosed to the internal mammary artery. Br J Plast Surg 47(7):495–501
Christiano JG, Rosson GD (2010) Clinical experience with the delay phenomenon in autologous breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. Microsurgery 30(7):526–531
Hamilton K et al (2014) The Delay Phenomenon: A Compilation of Knowledge across Specialties. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 7(2):112–118
Galanis C et al (2014) Microvascular lifeboats: a stepwise approach to intraoperative venous congestion in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 134(1):20–27
Wagner DS, Michelow BJ, Hartrampf CR Jr (1991) Double-pedicle TRAM flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 88(6):987–997
Arnez ZM, Scamp T (1992) The bipedicled free TRAM flap. Br J Plast Surg 45(3):214–218
Berrino P et al (1999) The “parasite” TRAM flap for autogenous tissue breast reconstruction in patients with vertical midabdominal scars. Ann Plast Surg 43(2):119–126
Sbitany H, Lentz R, Piper M (2019) The “dual-plane” DIEP flap: measuring the effects of superficial arterial and venous flow augmentation on clinical outcomes. J Reconstr Microsurg 35(6):411–416
Patel NG et al (2016) Stacked and bipedicled abdominal free flaps for breast reconstruction: considerations for shaping. Gland Surg 5(2):115–121
Beahm EK, Walton RL (2007) The efficacy of bilateral lower abdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(1):41–54
Malata, C.M, Rabey NG (2015) Decision making in double-pedicled DIEP and SIEA abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: an algorithmic approach and comprehensive classification. Front Surg 2(49). https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2015.00049
Christopoulos G et al (2020) The use of the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Plast Surg 85(6):e66–e75
Review Manager (RevMan) (2012) [Computer program]. Version 5.2. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, TCC
Seth AK et al (2019) Unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with bi-pedicled, conjoined deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg 35(2):145–155
Sultan SM et al (2020) Bipedicle-conjoined deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients: do the benefits outweigh the risks? J Reconstr Microsurg 36(5):346–352
Koolen PG et al (2015) Bipedicle-conjoined perforator flaps in breast reconstruction. J Surg Res 197(2):256–264
O’Neill AC et al (2014) A decision-making algorithm for recipient vein selection in bipedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap autologous breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 67(8):1089–1093
Stalder MW et al (2016) Using the retrograde internal mammary system for stacked perforator flap breast reconstruction: 71 breast reconstructions in 53 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 137(2):265e–277e
Salibian AA et al (2021) Comparing outcomes between stacked/conjoined and non-stacked/conjoined abdominal microvascular unilateral breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 41(3):240–249
Christopoulos G et al (2021) The use of bi-pedicled DIEP flap for unilateral breast reconstruction: a 5-year retrospective study. Eur J Plast Surg 44(3):325–332
Cho MJ, Haddock NT, Teotia SS (2020) Clinical decision making using CTA in conjoined, bipedicled DIEP and SIEA for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 36(4):241–246
Kim SY, Lee KT, Mun GH (2016) Computed tomographic angiography-based planning of bipedicled DIEP flaps with intraflap crossover anastomosis: an anatomical and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 138(3):409e-e418
Teotia SS et al (2020) Revisiting anastomosis to the retrograde internal mammary system in stacked free flap breast reconstruction: an algorithmic approach to recipient-site selection. Plast Reconstr Surg 145(4):880–887
Salgarello M et al (2010) Needing a large DIEAP flap for unilateral breast reconstruction: double-pedicle flap and unipedicle flap with additional venous discharge. Microsurgery 30(2):111–117
Haddock NT, Cho MJ, Teotia SS (2019) Comparative analysis of single versus stacked free flap breast reconstruction: a single-center experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 144(3):369e–377e
Tomouk T et al (2017) Donor site morbidity in DIEP free flap breast reconstructions: a comparison of unilateral, bilateral, and bipedicled surgical procedure types. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70(11):1505–1513
Lee YJ, Kim SA, Moon S-H, Jun YJ, Rhie JW, Oh DY (2020) Unilateral autologous breast reconstruction with unipedicled and bipedicled deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap: a review of 168 cases over 3 years. Microsurgery 40:663–669. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30601
Xu H, Dong J, Wang T (2009) Bipedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction: seven years’ experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1797–1807
Salibian AA, Nolan IT, Bekisz JM, Frey JD, Karp NS, Choi M, Levine JP, Thanik VD (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of microvascular stacked and conjoined-flap breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1723820
Hembd A et al (2018) Optimizing perforator selection: a multivariable analysis of predictors for fat necrosis and abdominal morbidity in DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 142(3):583–592
Lee KT et al (2015) Is Holm Zone III safe from fat necrosis in medial row perforator-based deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps? Microsurgery 35(4):272–278
Agarwal JP, Gottlieb LJ (2007) Double pedicle deep inferior epigastric perforator/muscle-sparing TRAM flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 58(4):359–363
Murray A et al (2015) Stacked abdominal flap for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 31(3):179–186
Sergesketter AR, Shammas RL, Taskindoust M, Glener AD, Pyfer BJ, Rezak K, Phillips BT, Hollenbeck ST (2021) A comparison of patient-reported outcomes in bipedicled total abdominal versus unipedicled hemiabdominal free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All work was done by one author.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This review article does not contain any studies involving human participants or animals performed by the author.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Conflicts of interest
Nada Raafat Khattab declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khattab, N.R. Complications of free bipedicled DIEP flaps in breast reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Plast Surg 45, 39–53 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01862-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01862-w