Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Workhorse flaps for distal digital reconstruction: an algorithmic approach to surgical decision-making

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Owing to its intricate structural and functional anatomy, the fingertip is immensely critical for a wide range of functions like sensation, gripping and fine handling. Therefore, it is important to be familiar with such injuries and their available treatment plans to ensure satisfactory aesthetic and functional results. We present our experience on fingertip reconstruction along with a critical analysis of the employed reconstructive techniques, their outcomes and an algorithm-based approach to address fingertip injuries.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all fingertip injuries presented to the Sawai Man Singh Hospital was conducted during September 2018 and September 2020. Data on the defects size, type of reconstructive technique employed, surgical outcomes and surgical complications was recorded and analyzed.

Results

This study included 92 fingertip injuries in 80 participants, 22 injured thumbs, 21 injured index fingers, 24 injured middle fingers, 20 injured ring fingers and 5 injured little fingers were reported. The most common mechanism of injury was machine injury (n = 58, 72.5%) and electric burn (n = 12, 15%). The most common surgical techniques were the V–Y advancement flap (n = 30), Moberg flap (n = 10), reverse homodigital island flap (n = 8) and first dorsal metacarpal artery flap (n = 8). The average size of soft tissue defect was 2.1 cm.

Conclusions

Adequate knowledge of the anatomical structures, a satisfactory analysis of the type and mechanism of injury aid in the selection of reconstructive alternatives for fingertip injury, which, in turn, prevents secondary deformities, improves functional outcomes and decreases secondary reconstructive procedures that are more complicated and have unpredictable results.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sorock GS, Lombardi DA, HauserRB Eisen EA, Herrick RF, Mittleman MA (2002) Acutetraumatic occupational handinjuries: type, location, and severity. J Occup Environ Med 44(4):345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lemmon JA, Janis JE, Rohrich RJ (2008) Soft-tissue injuries of the fingertip: methods of evaluation and treatment. An algorithmic approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(3):105e–117e

  3. Reid DBC, Shah KN, Eltorai AEM, Got CC, Daniels AH (2019) Epidemiology of finger amputations in the United States from 1997 to 2016. J Hand Surg Glob Online 1(2):45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Scheker LR, Becker GW (2011) Distal finger replantation. J Hand Surg Am 36(3):521–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franke TM, Ho T, Christie CA (2012) The chi-square test: often used and more often misinterpreted. Am J Eval 33(3):448–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dolgun A, Demirhan H (2017) Performance of nonparametric multiple comparison tests under heteroscedasticity, dependency, and skewed error distribution. Commun Stat Simul Comput 46(7):5166–5183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ostertagová E, Ostertag O, Kováč J (2014) Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Appl Mech Mater 611:115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Krauss EM, Lalonde DH (2014) Secondary healing of fingertip amputations: a review. Hand 9(3):282–288

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Buckley SC, Scott S, Das K (2000) Late review of the use of silver sulphadiazine dressings for the treatment of fingertip injuries. Injury 31(5):301–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang MX, Tan WQ, Fang QQ, Chen CY, Yao JM (2018) Clinical application of split-thickness skin with pedicle for finger wounds. Biomed Res Int 2018:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lee JH, Burm JS, Kang SY, Yang WY (2015) Full-thickness skin grafting with de-epithelization of the wound margin for finger defects with bone or tendon exposure. Arch Plast Surg 42(3):334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Shepard GH (1983) The use of lateral V-Y advancement flaps for fingertip reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 8(3):254–259

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yong FC, Teoh LC (1992) Nailbed reconstruction with split-thickness nail bed grafts. J Hand Surg 17(2):193–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Atasoy E, Ioakimidis E, Kasdan ML, Kutz JE, Kleinert HE (1970) Reconstruction of the amputated finger tip with a triangular volar flap. A new surgical procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52(5):921–926

  15. Gharb BB, Rampazzo A, ArmijoBS, et al (2010) Tranquilli-Leali or Atasoy flap: an anatomical cadaveric study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg 63(4):681–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lim JX, Chung KC (2020) VY advancement, thenar flap, and cross-finger flaps. Hand Clin 36(1):19–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thoma A, Vartija LK (2010) Making the V-Y advancement flap safer in fingertip amputations. Can J Plast Surg 18(4):e47–e49

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kutler W (1947) A new method for finger tip amputation. J Am Med Assoc 33(1):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tang JB, Elliot D, Adani R, Saint-Cyr M, Stang F (2014) Repair and reconstruction of thumb and finger tip injuries: a global view. Clin Plast Surg 41(3):325–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaber M (1979) Kutler repairfor the amputated fingertip. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 61(4):298–300

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Arpaci E, Unlu RE, Altun S, Ertas NM (2017) Super Kutler flap: an alternative technique for reconstruction of fingertip defects. J Hand Surg Eur 42(6):626–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sahu RK, Kala PC, Dixit PK, Chakraborty SS, K S, Katrolia D, (2020) Finger pulpreconstruction with thenarflap: aesthetic and functional outcome. Chinese J Traumatol -English Ed 23(5):307–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rinker B (2006) Fingertip reconstruction with the laterally based thenar flap: indications and long-term functional results. HAND 1(1):2–8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Gurdin M, Pangman WJ (1950) The repair of surface defects of fingers by trans-digital flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 5(4):368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Cronin TD (1951) The crossfinger flap: a new method of repair. Am Surg 17(5):419–425

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rabarin F, Saint Cast Y, JeudyJ, et al (2016) Cross-finger flap for reconstruction of fingertip amputations: long-term results. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102(4 Suppl):S225–S228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moberg E (1964) Aspects of sensation in reconstructive surgery of the upper extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 46:817–825

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Geissler WB, Slade JF (2011) Fractures of the carpal bones. In: Wolfe SW, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC, Kozin SH (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery, 6th edn. ChurchillLivingstone, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  29. O’Brien B (1968) Neurovascular island pedicle flaps for terminal amputations and digital scars. Br J Plast Surg 21(2–3):258–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Germann G, Sauerbier M, Rudolf KD, Hrabowski M (2015) Management of thumb tip injuries. J Hand Surg Am 40(3):614–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thibaudeau S, Tremblay DM, Tardif M, Chollet A (2012) Moberg modification using the first web space: thumb reconstruction following distal amputation. Hand 7(2):210–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Littler JW (1953) The neurovascular pedicle method of digital transposition for reconstruction of the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 12(5):303–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. William Littler J (1956) Principles of reconstructive surgery of the hand. Am J Surg 92(1):88–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Xarchas KC, Tilkeridis KE, Pelekas SI, Kazakos KJ, Kakagia DD, Verettas DA (2008) Littler’s flap revisited: an anatomic study, literature review, and clinical experience in the reconstruction of large thumb-pulp defects. Med Sci Monit 14(11):CR568–CR573

  35. Chen C, Meng Z, Tang P, Zhao G (2019) A comparison of the bipedicled nerve flap with the Littler flap for reconstructing a neurocutaneous defect of digits. Injury 50(4):848–854

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang H, Yang X, Chen C, Wang B, Wang W, Jia S (2018) Modified Littler flap for sensory reconstruction of large thumb pulp defects. J Hand Surg Eur 43(5):546–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Foucher G, Braun JB (1979) A new island flap transfer from the dorsum of the index to the thumb. Plast Reconstr Surg 63(3):344–349

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Muyldermans T, Hierner R (2009) First dorsal metacarpal artery flap for thumb reconstruction: a retrospective clinical study. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 4(1):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chang SC, Chen SL, Chen TM, Chuang CJ, Cheng TY, Wang HJ (2004) Sensate first dorsal metacarpal artery flap for resurfacing extensive pulp defects of the thumb. Ann Plast Surg 53(5):449–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Le Nen D, Hu W, Liot M, Moineau G, Gerard R (2007) The radial forearm flap. Interact Surg 2(2):108–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Niazi ZBM, McLean NR, Black MJM (1994) The radial forearm flap: a reconstructive chameleon. J Reconstr Microsurg 10(05):299–304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Chang SM, Hou CL, Zhang F, Lineaweaver WC, Chen ZW, Gu YD (2003) Distally based radial forearm flap with preservation of the radial artery: anatomic, experimental, and clinical studies. Microsurgery 23(4):328–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lai CS, Lin SD, Yang CC (1989) The reverse digital artery flap for fingertip reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 22(6):495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kojima T, Tsuchida Y, Hirase Y, Endo T (1990) Reverse vascular pedicle digital island flap. Br J Plast Surg 43(3):290–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Seah BZQ, Sebastin SJ, Chong AKS (2020) Retrograde flow digital artery flaps. Hand Clin 36(1):47–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Karacalar A, Ŝen C, Özcan M (2000) A modified reversed digital island flap incorporating the proper digital nerve. Ann Plast Surg 45(1):67–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Yazar M, Aydin A, Yazar SK, Başaran K, Güven E (2010) Sensory recovery of the reverse homodigital island flap in fingertip reconstruction: a review of 66 cases. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 44(5):345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samarth Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This is a retrospective study. The institutional ethics committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Patient consent

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (508 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gupta, S., Goil, P., Mohammad, A. et al. Workhorse flaps for distal digital reconstruction: an algorithmic approach to surgical decision-making. Eur J Plast Surg 45, 139–148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01840-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01840-2

Keywords [MeSH]

Navigation