Abstract
Background
Large penoscrotal defects with exposed testis are a challenge to reconstruct. Muscle flaps provide an excellent option to reconstruct such defects. The aim of the article is to present the authors’ experience in using gracilis muscle flap in the reconstruction of penoscrotal defects following Fournier’s gangrene.
Methods
All patients with Fournier’s gangrene who underwent a soft tissue reconstruction using unilateral gracilis muscle flap from January 2013 to November 2018 were prospectively included in the study. Patients with exposed testis, penoscrotal defects and dead spaces to fill were included, and exclusion criteria were persistent infection, large defects requiring bilateral gracilis or expected shortfall of coverage using unilateral gracilis muscle. Postop aesthetic assessment was done using modified Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS) after 6 months by an independent reviewer.
Results
Fourteen cases of post Fournier’s gangrene defects were reconstructed by using gracilis muscle flap with split skin graft in a tertiary care hospital. All were male patients. Age ranged from 20 to 72 years with mean age 35.5 years. After debridement and regular dressings, operation was done under general or spinal anaesthesia. All flaps survived well and there were no major complications encountered. All the patients had acceptable aesthetic outcomes on mean follow-up of 13.2 months.
Conclusions
The pedicled gracilis muscle flap with split skin graft is a good option for large defects involving penis, scrotum and perineum, especially in Fournier gangrene. This flap offers minimal donor site morbidity and minimal major complications with acceptable cosmetic outcomes.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee SH, Rah DK, Lee WJ (2012) Penoscrotal reconstruction with gracilis muscle flap and internal pudendal artery perforator flap transposition. Urology 79(6):1390–1394
Katusabe LJ, Balumuka D, Hodges A (2013) Scrotal reconstruction with a pedicled gracilis muscle flap after debridement of fournier’s gangrene: a case report. East Afr Med J 90:395–478
Karki D, Patel PK, Narayan RP (2016) Penoscrotal defect: a functional, esthetic and psychological challenge. Plast Aesthet Res 3:64–67
Arafa A (2016) Scrotal and perineal reconstruction by gracilis myocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Surg 40(1):81–87
Kyung H, Kwon H, Song SH, Oh S (2018) Reconstruction using local flaps for penoscrotal defects after ablation of skin lesions. J Wound Manag Res 14(1):37–43
Hejase MJ, Simonin JE, Bihrle R, Coogan CL (1996) Genital Fournier’s gangrene: experience with 38 patients. Urology 47:734
Corman JM, Moody JA, Aronson WJ (1999) Fournier’s gangrene in a modern surgical setting: improved survival with aggressive management. BJU Int 84:85
Ferreira PC, Reis JC, Amarante JM et al (2007) Fourniers gangrene: a review of 43 reconstructive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(1):175–184
Ellabban MG (2004) Single stage muscle flap reconstruction of major scrotal defects. Burns 30:505
Islam MT, Dey PK, Karnal AHM et al (2017) Evaluation of scrotal reconstruction with thigh flap. Bang Med J Khulna 50:13–17
Daigeler A, Behr B, Mikhail B, Lehnhardt M, Wallner C (2016) Bilateral pedicled gracilis flap for scrotal reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69(9):e195–e196
Can B (2019) Reconstruction after Fournier gangrene: our approaches and outcomes. Turk J Plast Surg 27:132–136
Tran N (2011) Scrotal and perineal reconstruction. Semin Plast Surg 25(03):213–220
KayikçioğLu A (2003) A new technique in scrotal reconstruction: short gracilis flap. Urology 61(6):1254–1256
Hsu H, Lin CM, Cheng LF, Chien SH (2007) Unilateral gracilis myofasciocutaneous advancement flap for single stage reconstruction of scrotal and perineal defects. JPRAS 60(9):1055–1059
Kim KS, Noh BK, Kim DY et al (2001) Thin paraumbilical perforator-based cutaneous island flap for scrotal resurfacing. Plast Reconstr Surg 108(2):447–451
Hallock GG (1990) Scrotal reconstruction following Fournier’s gangrene using the medial thigh fasciocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 24:86–90
Koshima I, Soeda S, Yamasaki M, Kyou J (1988) The free and pedicled anteromedial thigh flap. Ann Plast Surg 21:480
Hirshowitz B, Peretz BA (1982) Bilateral superomedial thigh flaps for primary reconstruction of scrotum and vulva. Ann Plast Surg 8:390–396
Maharaj D, Naraynsingh V, Perry A, Ramdass M (2002) The scrotal reconstruction using the “Singapore sling.” Plast Reconstr Surg 110:203–205
El-Khatib HA (2002) V-Y fasciocutaneous pudendal thigh flap for repair of perineum and genital region after necrotizing fasciitis: modification and new indication. Ann Plast Surg 48(4):370–375
Sharzer LA, McCarthy JG (1990) Free flap transfer in the upper extremity plastic surgery. WB Saunders, New York, p 446
McGregor IA, Soutar D (1990) The groin skin flap. In: Strauch B, Vasconez LO, Hall-Findlay EJ (eds) Grabb’s encylopedia of flaps, vol 2. Little, Brown, Boston, pp 1094–100
Banks DW, O’Brien DP, Amerson JR, Hester TR (1986) Gracilis musculocutaneous flap scrotal reconstruction after Fournier Gangrene. Urology 28:275–276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
DK was the operating surgeon. DK and JJ conceptualised the manuscript. JJ and VM wrote the manuscript and compiled the data and results. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by Institutional Review Board vide S. No. IEC/VM MC/SJ H/Project/November/2018–1099.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. The participant has consented to the submission of the data to the journal.
Patient consent
Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs.
Conflict of interests
Durga Karki, Joyce Jesudas, and Vamseedharan Muthukumar declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karki, D., Jesudas, J. & Muthukumar, V. A surgical challenge: reconstruction of post Fournier’s gangrene large penoscrotal defects with pedicled Gracilis muscle flap. Eur J Plast Surg 44, 807–812 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01825-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-021-01825-1