Skip to main content

Microskin grafting: clinical study of its feasibility and results

European Journal of Plastic Surgery volume 44, pages 255–262 (2021)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Split-thickness autografts offer the best form of wound coverage, but limited donor sites and donor site related morbidity have resulted in the search for alternatives in the form of microskin graft.

Methods

Twenty-five consecutive patients with post burn, post traumatic, and post cellulitis raw area were included in this study. After appropriate preparation of recipient bed, microskin graft was applied under general/regional anaesthesia. The assessment of microskin graft was done clinically on 5th, 7th, 10th, and 14th days and until the wound healed. Percentage of microskin graft take/loss, presence of infection, and duration of wound healing were noted. Complete wound healing was considered the endpoint of the study. Late assessment was done at 3 and 6 months postoperative to assess the scar.

Results

There were 19 male and 6 female patients with mean age of 27.52 years (range 18–54 years). Mean size of wound was 337.48 cm2 (range 120–770 cm2). All wounds healed in ~ 17.28 days without the need of secondary skin grafting. There was no clinically evident infection in the grafted wounds. Overall graft survival rate was ~ 94.76%. After 2 months, homogenous scar was present but there was hypo-pigmentation in 4 cases. There was no hypertrophy or scar contracture at 6 months.

Conclusions

Micrografting is a feasible alternative for wound coverage and a useful tool for surgeons when donor sites are limited.

Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Chick LR (1988) Brief history and biology of skin grafting. Ann Plast Surg 21:358–365

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh M, Nuutila K, Kruse C, Robson MC, Caterson E, Eriksson E (2015) Challenging the conventional therapy: emerging skin graft techniques for wound healing. Plast Reconstr Surg 136:524e–530e

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. (2009) What is a microskin graft? In: Microskin grafting for vitiligo. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-605-2_9

  4. Sabella N (19I3) Medical record, 83, 478 (quoted by Gruss, J S, and Jirsch, D W (1978). Canadian Medical Association Journal 118:I237)

  5. Gabarro P (1943) A new method of grafting. Br Med J 1:723–724

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nystrom G (1959) Sowing of small skin graft particles as a method for epithelialization especially of extensive wound surfaces. Plast Reconstr Surg 23:226–239

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meek CP (1958) Successful microdermagrafting using the Meek-Wall microdermatome. Am J Surg 96:557–558

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tanner JC Jr, Vandeput J, Olley JF (1964) The mesh skin graft. Plast Reconstr Surg 34:287–292

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Falabella R (1971) Epidermal grafting. An original technique and its application in achromic and granulating areas. Arch Dermatol 104:592–600

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rheinwald JG, Green H (1975) Serial cultivation of strains of human epidermal keratinocytes: the formation of keratinizing colonies from single cells. Cell. 6:331–343

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang ML, Wang CY, Chang ZD, Cao DX, Han X (1986) Microskin grafting. II. Clinical report. Burns Incl Therm Inj 12:544–548

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Blair SD, Nanchahal J, Backhouse CM, Harper R, McCollum CN (1987) Microscopic split-skin grafts: a new technique for 30-fold expansion. Lancet. 2:483–484

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kreis RW, Vloemans AF, Hoekstra MJ, Mackie DP, Hermans RP (1989) The use of non-viable glycerol-preserved cadaver skin combined with widely expanded autografts in the treatment of extensive third-degree burns. J Trauma 29:51–54

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin TW, Horng SY (1994) A new method of microskin mincing. Burns 20:526

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xie W, Wang L, Tan H, Wang D, Liu J, Hu B, Huang W, Ren S, Sun K (2002) Microskin grafting by spraying in burn management. Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi 18:26–28

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee SS, Lin TM, Chen YH, Lin SD, Lai CS (2005) “Flypaper technique” a modified expansion method for preparation of postage stamp autografts. Burns. 31:753–757

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Serena TE (2015) Use of epidermal grafts in wounds: a review of an automated epidermal harvesting system. J Wound Care 24(4 Suppl):30–34

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh M, Nuutila K, Kruse C, Dermietzel A, Caterson EJ, Eriksson E (2016) Pixel grafting: an evolution of mincing for transplantation of full-thickness wounds. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:92e–99e

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stenn KS, Link R, Moellmann G, Madri J, Kuklinska E (1989) Dispase, a neutral protease from Bacillus polymyxa, is a powerful fibronectinase and type IV collagenase. J Invest Dermatol 93:287–290

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Svensjö T, Yao F, Pomahac B, Eriksson E (2001) Autologous keratinocyte suspensions accelerate epidermal wound healing in pigs. J Surg Res 99:211

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cui J, Shen LY, Wang GC (1991) Role of hair follicles in the repigmentation of vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol 97:410–416

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gou D, Currimbhoy S, Pandya AG (2015) Suction blister grafting for vitiligo: efficacy and clinical predictive factors. Dermatol Surg 41:633–639

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nanchahal J, Ward CM (1992) New grafts for old? A review of alternatives to autologous skin. Br J Plast Surg 45:354–363

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Biswas A, Bharara M, Hurst C, Armstrong DG, Rilo H (2010) The micrograft concept for wound healing: strategies and applications. J Diabetes Sci Technol 4:808–819

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kadam D (2016) Novel expansion techniques for skin grafts. Indian J Plast Surg 49:5–15

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamolz LP, Schintler M, Parvizi D, Selig H, Lumenta DB (2013) The real expansion rate of meshers and micrografts: things we should keep in mind. Ann Burns Fire Disasters XXVI:26–29

    Google Scholar 

  27. Peeters R, Hubens A (1988) The mesh skin graft—true expansion rate. Burns 14:239–240

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kreis RW, Mackie DP, Vloemans AW, Hermans RP, Hoekstra MJ (1993) Widely expanded postage stamp skin grafts using a modified meek technique in combination with an allograft overlay. Burns 19:142–145

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yojiro I, Hiroko T, Yoshiaki T (1994) A method for the preparation of microskin grafts using skin-graft meshers. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Henderson J, Arya R, Gillespie P (2012) Skin graft meshing, over-meshing and cross-meshing. Int J Surg 10:547–550

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rissin Y, Fodor L, Talmon G, Fishelson O, Ullmann Y (2009) Investigating human microskin grafting technique in a new experimental model. Burns. 35:681–686

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singh M, Nuutila K, Kruse C, Caterson EJ, Granter SR, Eriksson E (2014) Fate of the dermal component of micrografts in full-thickness wounds. Eplasty 14:e38

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Danks RR, Lairet K (2010) Innovations in caring for a large burn in the Iraq war zone. J Burn Care Res 31:665–669

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Hackl F, Kiwanuka E, Philip J, Gerner P, Aflaki P, Diaz-Siso JR, Sisk G, Caterson EJ, Junker JPE, Eriksson E (2014) Moist dressing coverage supports proliferation and migration of transplanted skin micrografts in full-thickness porcine wounds. Burns 40:274–280

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kok YO, Chong SJ, Liang WH, Keem TB, Chai TK (2015) Revolutionizing major burns management with micrografting – improved healthcare costs, time and burns resources. Plast Reconstr Surg 136(4 Suppl):64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hsieh C-S, Schuong J-Y, Huang WS, Huang T (2008) Five years experience of the modified Meek technique in the management of extensive burns. Burns 34:350–354

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lumenta B, Kamolz L, Keck M, Frey M (2011) Comparison of meshed versus MEEK micrografted skin expansion rate: claimed, achieved, and polled results. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:40–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Quintero EC, Machado JFE, Robles RAD (2018) Meek micrografting history, indications, technique, physiology and experience: a review article. J Wound Care 27(Sup2):S12–S18

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Samiadji M, Wardhana A (2012) Clinical applications of micro-skin grafting for skin defect coverage. Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi 1:98–101

    Google Scholar 

  40. Subrahmanyam M (1995) Amniotic membrane as a cover for microskin grafts. Br J Plast Surg 48:477–478

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Gao G (2017) Comparing the curative efficacy of different skin grafting methods for third-degree burn wounds. Med Sci Monit 23:2668–2673

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zuhaili B, Aflaki P, Koyama T, Fossum M, Reish R, Schmidt B, Pomahac B, Eriksson E (2010) Meshed skin grafts placed upside down can take if desiccation is prevented. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:855–865

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kiwanuka E, Hackl F, Philip J, Caterson EJ, Junker JP, Eriksson E (2011) Comparison of healing parameters in porcine full-thickness wounds transplanted with skin micrografts, split-thickness skin grafts, and cultured keratinocytes. J Am Coll Surg 213:728–735

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hackl F, Bergmann J, Granter SR, Koyama T, Kiwanuka E, Zuhaili B et al (2012) Epidermal regeneration by micrograft transplantation with immediate 100-fold expansion. Plast Reconstr Surg 129:443e–452e

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Chih-chun Y, Tsi-siang S, Wei-shia X (1982) A Chinese concept of treatment of extensive third-degree burns. Plast Reconstr Surg 70:238–254

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Lin H, Yang Y, Wang Y, Wang L, Zhou X, Liu J, Peng D (2014) Effect of mixed transplantation of autologous and allogeneic microskin grafts on wound healing in a rat model of acute skin defect. PLoS One 9:e85672

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Klapper AM, Moradian S, Pack P (2016) New technique: acute minced expansion graft of traumatic wound tissue. Adv Skin Wound Care 29:540–545

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Radharaman, Kumar P, K S A, Kumar Sharma R (2019) The role of recruited minced skin grafting in improving the quality of healing at the donor site of split-thickness skin graft-a comparative study. Burns. 45:923–928

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Williams F, Knapp D, Wallen M (1998) Comparison of the characteristics and features of pressure garments used in the management of burn scars. Burns. 24:329–335

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery NSCB Government Medical College, Jabalpur, MP, 482003, India

    Pawan Agarwal, Swati Tiwari, Rajeev Kukrele & Dhananjaya Sharma

Authors
  1. Pawan Agarwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Swati Tiwari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajeev Kukrele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dhananjaya Sharma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pawan Agarwal.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

Pawan Agarwal, Swati Tiwari, Rajeev Kukrele and Dhananjaya Sharma declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This is an observational study. Institutional ethical committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from patients and their parents or legal guardians in cases of minor.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, P., Tiwari, S., Kukrele, R. et al. Microskin grafting: clinical study of its feasibility and results. Eur J Plast Surg 44, 255–262 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01672-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-020-01672-6

Keywords

  • Micrograft
  • Skin
  • Burn
  • Post traumatic, wounds