Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: a new option for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects

Abstract

Reconstruction of lower back defects is challenging. Since primary repair is often not possible to achieve, there is a need for local or regional flap transfer. This report presents a new technique of reconstruction of lumbosacral defects by deep circumflex iliac artery perforator skin flap based on a propeller flap design. A lower back scar contracture and contour deformity in a 10-year-old female patient required excision and flap reconstruction. Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap was marked in the groin region as an elliptical skin paddle and dissected as an island flap based on a dominant musculocutaneous perforator. Following creation of the lumbosacral defect, reconstruction was accomplished by flap rotation based on a propeller flap design around the perforator. Donor site was closed primarily in layers. Complete flap survival was noted with uneventful recovery. Revision was later performed for flap debulking and contour restoration with pleasing result at 1 year. Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap can be utilized for lower back defect reconstruction by means of a propeller flap design. It is offered as a new flap option for lumbosacral reconstruction. The technique allows well-vascularized tissue transfer while accomplishing primary closure of the donor site with easily hidden scar. The disadvantages include tedious dissection as well as absence of a dominant perforator in some cases.

Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. 1.

    Mathis DW, Thornton JF, Rohrich RJ (2006) Management of posterior trunk defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:73e–83e

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dumanian GA, Ondra SL, Liu J, Schafer MF, Chao JD (2003) Muscle flap salvage of spine wounds with soft tissue defects or infection. Spine 28:1203–1211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wilhelmi BJ, Snyder N, Colquhoun T et al (2000) Bipedicle paraspinous muscle flaps for spinal wound closure. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1305–1311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nojima K, Brown SA, Acikel C, Janis J, Arbique G, Abulezz T, Gao J, Wen Q, Kurihara K, Rohrich RJ (2006) Defining vascular supply and territory of thinned perforator flaps: part II. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1338–1348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    O’Shaughnessy BA, Dumanian GA, Liu JC, Ganju A, Ondra SL (2007) Pedicled omental flaps as an adjunct in complex spine surgery. Spine 32:3074–3080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Glass BS, Disa JJ, Mehrara BJ et al (2006) Reconstruction of extensive partial or total sacractomy defects with a transabdominal vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Ann Plast Surg 56:526–530

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Duffy FJ, Weprin BE, Swift DM (2004) A new approach to closure of large lumbosacral myelomeningoceles: the superior gluteal artery perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1864–1868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Arkudas A, Horch RE, Reus S et al (2018) Retrospective cohort study of combined approach for trunk reconstruction using arteriovenous loops and free flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:394–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mathur BS, Tan SS, Bhat FA, Rozen WM (2016) The transverse lumbar perforator flap: an anatomic and clinical study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 69:770–776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Park HS, Morrison E, Lo C, Leong J (2016) An application of keystone perforator island flap for closure of lumbosacral myelomeningocele defects. Ann Plast Surg 77:332–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    de Fontaine S, Gaede F, Berthe JV (2008) The reverse turnover latissimus dorsi flap for closure of midline lumbar defects. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 61:917–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hamdi M, Craggs B, Brussaard C, Seidenstueker K, Hendrickx B, Zeltzer A (2016) Lumbar artery perforator flap: an anatomical study using multidetector computed tomographic scan and surgical pearls for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 138:343–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bissell MB, Greenspun DT, Levine J, Rahal W, al-Dhamin A, AlKhawaji A, Morris SF (2016) The lumbar artery perforator flap: 3-dimensional anatomical study and clinical applications. Ann Plast Surg 77:469–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    McGregor IA, Jackson IT (1972) The groin flap. Br J Plast Surg 25:3–16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Akyurek M, Conejero A, Dunn R (2008) Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap without iliac crest. Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1790–1795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Teo TC (2010) The propeller flap concept. Clin Plast Surg 37:615–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Taylor GI, Townsend P, Corlett R (1979) Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as the supply for groin flaps: clinical work. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:745–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Safak T, Klebuc MJ, Mavili E, Shenaq SM (1997) A new design of the iliac crest microsurgical free flap without including the obligatory muscle cuff. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1703–1709

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Taylor GI, Townsend P, Corlett R (1979) Superiority of the deep circumflex iliac vessels as the supply for groin flaps: experimental work. Plast Reconstr Surg 64:595–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Akyurek.

Ethics declarations

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

Mustafa Akyurek and Mark Albert declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This research involved a human participant and accepted principles of ethical and professional conduct was followed.

Informed consent

A written informed consent was obtained from the patient and filed.

Electronic supplementary material

DCIA perforator skin flap rotation to lower back defect based on propeller flap design. (MOV 6546 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akyurek, M., Albert, M. Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap: a new option for reconstruction of lumbosacral defects. Eur J Plast Surg 42, 201–204 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-018-1461-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Lumbosacral
  • Back
  • Reconstruction
  • Flap
  • Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator