Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 41, Issue 2, pp 137–146 | Cite as

Three-dimensional printing modeling: application in maxillofacial and hand fractures and resident training

  • Oscar Mario Jacobo
  • Virginia E. Giachero
  • Denisse K. Hartwig
  • Gustavo A. Mantrana
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Imaging techniques in reconstructive surgery are of great assistance not only in diagnosis but also in preoperative planning; however, they are often limited to interpreting three-dimensional structures on flat surfaces. Three-dimensional (3D) printing has made it possible to overcome these limitations by allowing the creation of customized 3D anatomical models. We set out to create 3D printed models to demonstrate its application in maxillofacial and hand fractures and resident training.

Methods

Ten patients with hand and craniofacial fractures of different types were studied. Computed tomography was performed; the image files were processed digitally, and 3D models were subsequently printed. The quality and accuracy of the obtained models were rigorously evaluated, and the models were then used by plastic surgery teachers and residents in the preoperative planning.

Results

The comparative measurements confirmed that the models are at real scale with a 1:1 ratio; the pre-cast osteosynthesis plates were perfectly matched to the patient’s anatomy intraoperatively, and the lengths of the pre-selected screws were accurate. The anesthetic surgical time was reduced by 20%. Teachers and residents were satisfied with the use of models for clinical discussions of patients and for preoperative planning and the advantages of manipulating physical models were highlighted.

Conclusions

We have created low-cost, good quality, reliable, and accurate 3D printed models for the preoperative planning of reconstructive surgeries of maxillofacial and hand fractures, reducing the operative times and providing a new academic teaching tool in the training of residents of plastic surgery.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Keywords

Three-dimensional printing Computer-assisted surgery Plastic surgery Maxillofacial injuries Fracture fixation Hand injuries 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

Jacobo Oscar, Giachero Virginia, Hartwig Denisse, and Mantrana Gustavo declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in studies involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of retrospective study formal consent from a local ethics committee is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Kim M, Hansgen A, Wink O et al (2008) Rapid prototyping: a new tool in understanding and treating structural heart disease. Circulation 117:2388–2394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Suzuki M, Ogawa Y, Kawano A et al (2004) Rapid prototyping of temporal bone for surgical training and medical education. Acta Otolaryngol 124:400–402CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jarrahy R, Vo V, Goenjian H, Tabit C et al (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of maxillofacial trauma two-dimensional and three-dimensional computed tomographic scans: comparison of oral surgeons, head and neck surgeons, plastic surgeons, and neuroradiologists. Plast Reconst Surg 127(6):2432–2440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gutierrez-Ventura F, Robles-Apac R (2013) Estereolitografía en Cirugía Maxilofacial. Rev Estomatol Herediana 23(4):216–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hull C (1986) Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US Patent 4:575,330Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies: rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Media, Springer Science BusinessCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crump S (1992) Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. U.S. Patent 5,121,329Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerstle T, Ibrahim A, Kim P, Lee B, Lim S (2014) A plastic surgery application in evolution: three-dimensional printing. Plast Reconstr Surg 133:446–451CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ventola C (2014) Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. Pharm Ther 39(10):704–711Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bizzotto N, Sandri A, Regis D, Romani D, Tami I, Magnan B (2015) Three-dimensional printing of bone fractures: a new tangible realistic way for preoperative planning and education. Surg Innov 22(5):548–551CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mehra P, Miner J, D’Innocenzo R, Nadershah M (2011) Use of 3-d stereolithographic models in oral and maxillofacial surgery. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 10(1):6–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hidalgo H, Romo G, Estolano R (2009) Stereolithography: a method for planning the surgical correction of the hypertelorism. J Craniofac Surg 20(5):1473CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sailer H, Haers P, Zollikofer C, Warnke T, Carls F, Stuck P (1998) The value of stereolithographic models for preoperative diagnosis of craniofacial deformities and planning of surgical corrections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 27:327–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartlett S (2013) Printing organs on demand. Lancet Respir Med 1:684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cui X, Boland T, D'Lima D et al (2012) Thermal inkjet printing in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine. Recent Pat Drug Deliv Formul 6:149–155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Murphy S, Atala A (2014) 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs. Nat Biotechnol 32:773–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ozbolat I, Yu Y (2013) Bioprinting toward organ fabrication: challenges and future trends. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 60:691–699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zopf D, Hollister S, Nelson M et al (2013) Bioresorbable airway splint created with a three-dimensional printer. N Engl J Med 368:2043–2045CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang J, Cai H, Lv J et al (2014) In vivo study of a self-stabilizing artificial vertebral body fabricated by electron beam melting. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 39(8):e486–e492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim B, Hong K, Park K et al (2012) Customized cranioplasty implants using three-dimensional printers and polymethyl-methacrylate casting. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52:541–546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jirman R, Horák Z, Mazánek J, Reznícek J (2009) Individual replacement of the frontal bone defect: case report. Prague Med Rep 110:79–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Martens K et al (1998) An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 17(5):842–852CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tetsworth K, Block S, Glatt V (2017) Putting 3D modelling and 3D printing into practice: virtual surgery and preoperative planning to reconstruct complex post-traumatic skeletal deformities and defects. SICOT-J 3:16CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dai K, Yan M, Zhu Z, Sun Y (2007) Computer-aided custom-made hemipelvic prosthesis used in extensive pelvic lesions. J Arthroplast 22(7):981–986CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Harrysson O, Hosni Y, Nayfeh J (2007) Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:91CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    He J, Li D, Lu B et al (2006) Custom fabrication of composite tibial hemi-knee joint combining CAD/CAE/CAM techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 220(8):823–830CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    ParisaKamali DD, Skoracki R et al (2016) The current role of three-dimensional printing in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pfaff MJ, Steinbacher DM (2016) Plastic surgery applications using three-dimensional planning and computer-assisted design and manufacturing. Plast Reconstr Surg 137:603eCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R et al (2014) Utility of multimaterial 3D printers in creating models with pathological entities to enhance the training experience of neurosurgeons. J Neurosurg 120:489–492CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kimura T, Morita A, Nishimura K et al (2009) Simulation of and training for cerebral aneurysm clipping with 3-dimensional models. Neurosurgery 65:719–725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Chueh J, Wakhloo A, Gounis M (2009) Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. Am J Neuroradiol 30:1159–1164Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hakansson A, Rantatalo M, Hansen T et al (2011) Patient specific biomodel of the whole aorta—the importance of calcified plaque removal. Vasa 40(6):453–459CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Costello J, Olivieri L, Su L et al (2015) Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. Congenit Heart Dis 10(2):185–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cheung C, Looi T, Lendvay T, Drake J, Farhat W (2014) Use of 3-dimensional printing technology and silicone modeling in surgical simulation: development and face validation in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Surg Educ 71:762–767CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bruyere F, Leroux C, Brunereau L, Lermusiaux P (2008) Rapid prototyping model for percutaneous nephrolithotomy training. J Endourol 22:91–96CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watson R (2014) A low-cost surgical application of additive fabrication. J Surg Educ 71:14–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Leong N, Buijze G, Fu E, Stockmans F et al (2010) Computer-assisted versus non-computer-assisted preoperative planning of corrective osteotomy for extra-articular distal radius malunions: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Stockmans F, Dezillie M, Vanhaecke J (2013) Accuracy of 3D virtual planning of corrective osteotomies of the distal radius. J Wrist Surg 2:306–314CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Miyake J, Murase T, Moritomo H, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H (2011) Distal radius osteotomy with volar locking plates based on computer simulation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(6):1766–1773CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oka K, Moritomo H, Goto A et al (2008) Corrective osteotomy for malunited intra-articular fracture of the distal radius using a custom-made surgical guide based on three-dimensional computer simulation: case report. J Hand Surg Am 33(6):835–840CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Byrne A, Impelmans B, Bertrand V et al (2017) Corrective osteotomy for malunited diaphyseal forearm fractures using preoperative 3-dimensional planning and patient-specific surgical guides and implants. J Hand Surg Am.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.003
  42. 42.
    Bilic R, Zdravkovic V, Boljevic Z (1994) Osteotomy for deformity of the radius. Computer-assisted three-dimensional modelling. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76-B:150–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vlachopoulos L, Schweizer A, Graf M et al (2015) Three-dimensional postoperative accuracy of extra-articular forearm osteotomies using CT-scan based patient-specific surgical guides. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 16:336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Schweizer A, Fürnstahl P, Nagy L (2013) Three-dimensional correction of distal radius intra-articular malunions using patient-specific drill guides. J Hand Surg Am 38(12):2339–2347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kataoka T, Oka K, Miyake J et al (2013) 3-dimensional prebent plate fixation in corrective osteotomy of malunited upper extremity fractures using a real-sized plastic bone model prepared by preoperative computer simulation. J Hand Surg Am 38(5):909–919CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vlachopoulos L, Schweizer A, Meyer D et al (2016) Three-dimensional corrective osteotomies of complex malunited humeral fractures using patient-specific guides. J Shoulder Elb Surg 25(12):2040–2047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Mankovich N, Cheeseman A, Stoker N (1990) The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. J Digit Imaging 3:200–203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Ishibashi-Kanno N et al (2014) Mandibular reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates contour deformity. Head Face Med 10:45CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Danelson K, Gordon E, David L, Stitzel J (2009) Using a three dimensional model of the pediatric skull for pre-operative planning in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Biomed Sci Instrum 45:358–363Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Louvrier A, Marty P, Barrabé A (2017) How useful is 3D printing in maxillofacial surgery? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg 118(4):206–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jacobs C, Lin A (2017) A new classification of three-dimensional printing technologies: systematic review of three-dimensional printing for patient-specific craniomaxillofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 139(5):1211–1220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Alvarez C, Carrillo J, Fernández J et al (2006) Avances en equipamiento y sus materiales, un paso hacia el futuro. Cient Dent 3(2):151–156Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zerr J, Chatzinoff Y, Chopra R, Estrera K, Chhabra A (2016) Three-dimensional printing for preoperative planning of total hip arthroplasty revision: case report. Skelet Radiol 45(10):1431–1435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chan H, Siewerdsen J, Vescan A, Daly M et al (2015) 3D rapid prototyping for otolaryngology-head and neck surgery: applications in image-guidance, surgical simulation and patient-specific modeling. PLoS One 10(9):e0136370CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lim C, Campbell D, Clucas D (2014) Rapid prototyping technology in orbital floor. Reconstruction: application in three patients. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstruct 7:143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Williams J, Revington P (2010) Novel use of an aerospace selective laser sintering machine for rapid prototyping of an orbital blowout fracture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39(2):182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Bagaria V, Deshpande S, Rasalkar D, Kuthe A, Paunipagar B (2011) Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures. Eur J Radiol 80(3):814CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Tang W, Guo L, Long J (2010) Individual design and rapid prototyping in reconstruction of orbital wall defects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68(3):562CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Roy A, Efanov J, Mercier-Couture G et al (2017) Zygomatico-maxillary reconstruction with computer-aided manufacturing of a free DCIA osseous flap and intraoral anastomoses. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 5(2):e1226CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Suomalainen A, Stoor P, Mesimaki K, Kontio R (2015) Rapid prototyping modelling in oral and maxilofacial surgery: a two year retrospective study. J Clin Exp Dent 7(5):605–612Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Starosolski Z, Kan J, Rosenfeld S, Krishnamurthy R, Annapragada A (2014) Application of 3-D printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders. Pediatr Radiol 44:216–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lethaus B, Poort L, Böckmann R, Smeets R, Tolba R, Kessler P (2012) Additive manufacturing for microvascular reconstruction of the mandible in 20 patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 40(1):43–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Hanasono M, Skoracki R (2010) Improving the speed and accuracy of mandibular reconstruction using preoperative virtual planning and rapid prototype modeling. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Liu Y, Xu L, Zhu H, Liu S (2014) Technical procedures for template-guided surgery for mandibular reconstruction based on digital design and manufacturing. Biomed Eng Online 13:63CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Mario Jacobo
    • 1
  • Virginia E. Giachero
    • 1
  • Denisse K. Hartwig
    • 1
  • Gustavo A. Mantrana
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Clinical Hospital “Dr. Manuel Quintela”, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of The Oriental Republic of Uruguay (UDELAR)MontevideoUruguay

Personalised recommendations