Abstract
Background
Day surgery units (DSUs) have streamlined the treatment of hand trauma. This study describes how the establishment of the Birmingham Hand DSU has improved the service over a 10-year period.
Methods
Data was collected on patients requiring surgery for acute hand trauma for a period of 1 month at four separate time points: (1) prior to establishment of DSU, (2) 1 month following DSU opening, (3) 1 year following DSU opening and (4) 8 years following DSU opening. The number and types of operation performed, day case rates, and bed occupancy rates were analysed. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
The volume of hand trauma has increased over time (77 cases/month-2002; 109-2003; 90-2004; av. 150-2011). Sharp lacerations and crush injuries remain the most common. The percentage of patients admitted has fallen (84.4% 2002; 64.2% 2003; 46.7% 2004; 33.6% 2011 p = 0.0003) whilst the day case rate has increased (13.0% 2002; 33.9% 2003; 51.1% 2004; 67.5% 2011 p = 0.004). Bed occupancy rate per patient has fallen (2.64 days-2002; 2.08-2003; 1.34-2004; 1.21-2011).
Conclusions
Despite an increased caseload, increased utilisation of the DSU has led to reduced patient waiting times and bed occupancy rates whilst increasing patient satisfaction and reducing costs.
Level of Evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Day surgery: operational guide. D.o. Health, Editor 2002, Department of Health. p. 1–40.
Burke FD, Dias JJ, Heras Palou C (2004) Providing care for hand disorders a re-appraisal of need. J Hand Surg Br 29(6):575–9
Dillon CK, Chester DL, Nightingale P (2009) The evolution of a hand day-surgery unit. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 91(7):559–64
Hill C, Riaz M, Mozzam A (1998) A regional audit of hand and wrist injuries. A study of 4873 injuries. J Hand Surg Br 23(2):196–200
Sorock GS, Lombardi DA, Hauser RB (2002) Acute traumatic occupational hand injuries: type, location, and severity. J Occup Environ Med 44(4):345–51
Horton T, Dias J, Burke F (2007) Social deprivation and hand injury. J Hand Surg 32(3):256–261
Rhodes L, Miles G, Pearson A (2006) Patient subjective experience and satisfaction during the perioperative period in the day surgery setting: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Pract 12(4):178–92
Chan VW, Peng PW, Kaszas Z, Middleton WJ, Muni R, Anastakis DG, Graham BA (2001) A comparative study of general anesthesia, intravenous regional anesthesia, and axillary block for outpatient hand surgery: clinical outcome and cost analysis. Anesth Analg 93(5):1181–4
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank our dedicated team of hand coordinators and all the hand surgeons at Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham who make this service possible.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
None received.
Conflict of interests
Arvind Mohan, Richard M. Thomson, Garth Titley and Darren L. Chester declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical standards
For this kind of retrospective study, formal consent from a local ethics committee is not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohan, A., Thomson, R.M., Titley, G. et al. Ten years of acute hand trauma: is day case surgery still working? A review of 726 patients. Eur J Plast Surg 39, 287–292 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1203-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-016-1203-9