Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Autologous breast reconstruction with the transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap: aesthetic improvements with tissue expansion before free flap transfer

  • Ideas and Innovations
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The transverse myocutaneous gracilis (TMG) flap provides an alternative to commonly used free flaps from the lower abdomen and buttocks for breast reconstruction. Excellent aesthetic results can be achieved in primary breast reconstruction after subcutaneous and skin-sparing mastectomy. However, in delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy, an obvious skin island and conspicuous scars often compromise the final appearance. A two-stage approach with tissue expansion of the skin followed by free deepithelialised TMG flap reconstruction avoids these disadvantages and leads to improved aesthetic results. We treated two patients who asked for an autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy due to primary breast cancer. Reconstruction with lower abdominal tissue was not feasible in one patient because of a previous abdominoplasty and in the other because of insufficient lower abdominal tissue. Both patients declined an implant-based breast reconstruction as well as a procedure using a flap from the buttock, favouring reconstruction with autologous tissue from the superior inner thigh. In the first stage, a tissue expander was inserted endoscopically assisted via a transaxillary approach. The expander was gradually filled over a 3-month period and finally replaced by a free deepithelialised TMG flap. The postoperative period was uneventful in both patients. We achieved satisfying results in both patients with good breast symmetry and uniform colour of the breast skin. Disadvantages and limitations of traditional one-stage breast reconstructions by free TMG flaps can be avoided by this two-stage approach. This reconstructive procedure leads to inconspicuous scars and a matching skin colour of both breasts.

Level of Evidence: Level V, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clough KB, O'Donoghue JM, Fitoussi AD, Vlastos G, Falcou MC (2001) Prospective evaluation of late cosmetic results following breast reconstruction: II. Tram flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107(7):1710–1716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yu SC, Kleiber GM, Song DH (2013) An algorithmic approach to total breast reconstruction with free tissue transfer. Arch Plast Surg 40(3):173–180

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buntic RF, Horton KM, Brooks D, Althubaiti GA (2011) Transverse upper gracilis flap as an alternative to abdominal tissue breast reconstruction: technique and modifications. Plast Reconstr Surg 128(6):607e–613e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnez ZM, Pogorelec D, Planinsek F, Ahcan U (2004) Breast reconstruction by the free transverse gracilis (TUG) flap. Br J Plast Surg 57(1):20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tadiparthi S, Alrawi M, Collis N (2011) Two-stage delayed breast reconstruction with an expander and free abdominal tissue transfer: outcomes of 65 consecutive cases by a single surgeon. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 64(12):1608–1612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurunluoglu R, Spanio S, Rainer C, Ninkovic M (2003) Skin expansion before breast reconstruction with the superior gluteal artery perforator flap improves aesthetic outcome. Ann Plast Surg 50(5):475–479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Momeni A, Padron NT, Bannasch H, Borges J, Bjorn Stark G (2006) Endoscopic transaxillary subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty: a safe and predictable procedure. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(10):1076–1081

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wechselberger G, Schoeller T (2004) The transverse myocutaneous gracilis free flap: a valuable tissue source in autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(1):69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fernando B, Young VL, Logan SE (1988) Miniature implantable laser Doppler probe monitoring of free tissue transfer. Ann Plast Surg 20(5):434–442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Levine SM, Snider C, Gerald G, Tanna N, Broer PN, Stolier A et al (2013) Buried flap reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy: advancing toward single-stage breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 132(4):489e–497e

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schwarz K, Tahiri Y (2011) Subcutaneous pre-expansion of mastectomy flaps before breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: eliminating the patch-like appearance and improving aesthetic outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 66(2):124–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iblher N, Eisenhardt SU, Penna V, Stark GB, Bannasch H (2010) A new evaluation tool for monitoring devices and its application to evaluate the implantable Doppler probe. J Reconstr Microsurg 26(4):265–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None.

Ethical Standards

All patients gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study were omitted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Braig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torio-Padron, N., Eisenhardt, S.U., Bannasch, H. et al. Autologous breast reconstruction with the transverse myocutaneous gracilis flap: aesthetic improvements with tissue expansion before free flap transfer. Eur J Plast Surg 37, 443–448 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-0978-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-014-0978-9

Keywords

Navigation