Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

DIEAP flap selection for unilateral breast reconstruction: a comparison of flap side harvest

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

For breast reconstruction, the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEAP) flap can be harvested at the same side as that in mastectomy (ipsilateral) or from the contralateral hemi-abdomen. This paper seeks to establish the benefits of either side of DIEAP flap harvest, on the basis of our experience and a literature review.

Methods

We analysed our experience with the DIEAP flap and compared the two different technical approaches to flap harvesting. Using the internal mammary vessels as the standard recipient, with comparable vessels on either side, we compared the differences between harvesting on the contralateral and ipsilateral hemi-abdomen and analysed any references to it in the literature.

Results

Seventy-three DIEAP flaps were harvested for breast reconstruction, over a 2-year period, by the two senior authors. Of the 44 cases where the ipsilateral hemi-abdomen was used, this was the routine primary choice of the operating surgeon in 42 cases. The contralateral hemi-abdomen was the preferred choice in 29 cases. We accessed 302 papers related to the topic of breast reconstruction using a DIEAP flap, of which 63 papers were reviewed, based on the abstracts. Only six of these papers mentioned their routine or preferred choice of the hemi-abdomen.

Conclusions

There appears to be no consensus in the literature as to the preferred side of DIEAP flap harvest, if the perforators are of similar calibre and ease of dissection. Modern DIEAP flap harvest is based on the preoperative selection of the most reliable perforator. In relation to mastectomy defect, this may be on the ipsilateral or contralateral.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, prognostic/risk study

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koshima I, Soeda S (1989) Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 42:645–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen RJ, Treece P (1994) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 32:32–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Weiler-Mithoff E, Hodgson ELB, Malata CM (2002) Perforator flap breast reconstruction. Breast Dis 16:93–106

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rozen WM, Garcia-Tutor E, Alonso-Burgos A, Acosta R, Stillaert F, Zubieta JL et al (2010) Planning and optimising DIEP flaps with virtual surgery: the Navarra experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63:289–297

    Google Scholar 

  5. Taylor GI, Doyle M, McCarten G (1990) The Doppler probe for planning flap: anatomical study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 43:1–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rozen WM, Philips TJ, Ashton MW et al (2008) Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blondeel P, Morrison C (2012) The deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. In: Neligan P, Gurtner G, Warren R, Rodriguez E, Song D, Grotting J, Chang J, Losee J, Van Beek A (eds) Plastic surgery, 3rd edn, Breast volume. New York, Elsevier

  8. Hamdi M, Weiler-Mithoff E, Webster MHC (1999) Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(1):86–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hamdi M, Khuthaila DK, Landuyt KV, Roche N, Monstrey S (2007) Double-pedicle abdominal perforator free flaps for unilateral breast reconstruction: new horizons in microsurgical tissue transfer to the breast. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 60:904–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blondeel PN, Hijjawi J, Depypere H, Roche N, Landuyt KV (2009) Shaping the breast in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery: an easy three step principle. Part II—Breast reconstruction after total mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 123(3):794–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dupin CL, Allen RJ, Glass CA, Bunch R (1996) The internal mammary artery and vein as a recipient site for free-flap breast reconstruction: a report of 110 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:685–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ (2006) Breast reconstruction using perforator flaps. J Surg Oncol 94(6):441–454

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ (2006) Breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap: history and an update on current technique. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 59(6):571–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeevan R, Cromwell D, Browne J, Meulen J, Pereira J, Caddy C et al (2011) National mastectomy and breast reconstruction audit 2011. The NHS Information Centre; Document reference: IC20010111. www.rcseng.ac.uk/surgeons/research/surgical-research/docs/nationalmastectomy-and-breast-reconstruction-audit-fourth-report-2011. Accessed 14 May 2013

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannah Eliza John.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

John, H.E., Morrison, C. & Irwin, M. DIEAP flap selection for unilateral breast reconstruction: a comparison of flap side harvest. Eur J Plast Surg 36, 685–688 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0852-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0852-1

Keywords

Navigation