Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 36, Issue 11, pp 707–714 | Cite as

The impact of surgical duration on plastic surgery outcomes

  • Aksharananda Rambachan
  • Lauren M. Mioton
  • Sujata Saha
  • Neil Fine
  • John Y. S. KimEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

Background

Historically, prolonged operative time has been associated with increased risk for morbidity and mortality. However, there is a paucity of clear data regarding the effect of longer operative times on outcomes in the field of plastic surgery. We endeavored to investigate the impact of operative time on postoperative morbidity and mortality in plastic surgery.

Methods

Utilizing a multi-institutional surgical outcomes database spanning from 2006 to 2010, we identified 15,289 plastic surgery procedures. Operative time was tracked in 30-min increments. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to investigate the relationship between operative time and primary outcomes of interest (medical complications, surgical complications, overall complications, and mortality). Subgroup analysis explored the relationship between operative time and outcomes in a homogenous high-risk cohort.

Results

When progressing from the shortest surgical duration cohort to the longest, we see an incremental increase in overall complications (6.22 to 24.86 %), surgical complications (2.73 to 13.08 %), and medical complications (3.68 to 15.89 %). Furthermore, for every 30-min increase in operative time, there was a corresponding increased risk for 30-day overall complications (odds ratio (OR) 1.13, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.18), medical complications (OR 1.14, 95 % CI 1.06–1.23), and surgical complications (OR 1.14, 95 % CI 1.09–1.20). There was no significant association with 30-day mortality. Findings were substantiated through subgroup analysis.

Conclusions

Drawing from data on over 15,000 plastic surgery procedures, we determined that increased operative time was associated with a higher risk of medical, surgical, and overall complications. As outcome measures take a more prominent role in the care of plastic surgery patients, these findings will advance patient education and practice management.

Level of Evidence: Level III, pronostic/risk study

Keywords

Plastic surgery Operative time Outcomes Complications 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, private, or not-for-profit sectors. Lauren M. Mioton is supported by a research scholarship funded through Vanderbilt University School of Medicine by NIH CTSA grant UL1RR024975.

Conflict of interest

None

References

  1. 1.
    Bainbridge D, Martin J, Arango M, Cheng D (2012) Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 9847(380):1075–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Li G, Warner M, Lang BH, Huang L, Sun LS (2009) Epidemiology of anesthesia-related mortality in the US, 1955–2005. Anesthesiology 110(4):759–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morello DC, Colon GA, Fredricks S, Iverson RE, Singer R (1997) Patient safety in accredited office surgical facilities. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(6):1496–1500PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Institute for Healthcare Improvement (2007) Status quon’t—why heath care will never be the same. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. http://www.ihi.org/about/Documents/2007_IHIProgressReport.pdf. Accessed March 1 2013
  5. 5.
    Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine. http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2001/Crossing-the-Quality-Chasm-A-New-Health-System-for-the-21st-Century.aspx. Accessed March 1 2013
  6. 6.
    Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (1999) To err is human; building a safer health system. Institute of Medicine. http://www.iom.edu/~/media/Files/Report%20Files/1999/To-Err-is-Human/To%20Err%20is%20Human%201999%20%20report%20brief.pdf. Accessed March 1 2013
  7. 7.
    The Joint Commission (2012) Improving America’s hospitals: a report on quality and safety. The Joint Commission. http://www.jointcommission.org/improving_americas_hospitals_joint_commission_annual_report_quality_safety_2012/. Accessed March 1 2013
  8. 8.
    Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR et al (2009) A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360(5):491–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Iverson RE (2002) ASPS Task Force on Patient Safety in Office-Based Surgery Facilities. Patient safety in office-based surgery: facilities, I: procedures in the office based surgery setting. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1337–1342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allen F (1931) Respiratory complications in relation to the administration of anesthetics. N Engl J Med 204:1288–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson AS, Lombard HL (1941) The estimation of operative risk in patients with cancer. N Engl J Med 224:759–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smythe CM, Osborne MP, Zamcheck N, Richards WA, Madison WM Jr (1957) Bleeding from the upper gastrointestinal tract—an analysis of 111 cases. N Engl J Med 256:441–447PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Welch CE (1966) Abdominal surgery. N Engl J Med 275:1291–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nahmias AJ, Eickhoff TC (1961) Staphyloccocal infections in hospitals—recent developments in epidemiologic and laboratory investigation. N Engl J Med 265:177–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waldvogel FA, Medoff G, Swartz MN (1970) Osteomyelitis: a review of clinical features, therapeutic considerations and unusual aspects. N Engl J Med 282:260–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thompson JE, Garrett WV (1980) Peripheral-arterial surgery. N Engl J Med 302:491–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nichols R (1982) Postoperative wound infection. N Engl J Med 307:1701–1702PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hackmann T, Gascoyne RD, Naiman SC et al (1989) A trial of desmopressin (1-desamino-8-D arginine vasopressin) to reduce blood loss in uncomplicated cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med 321:1437–1443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wenzel RP (1992) Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. N Engl J Med 326:337–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kurz A, Sessler DI, Lenhardt R (1996) Perioperative normothermia to reduce the incidence of surgical-wound infection and shorten hopsitalization. N Engl J Med 334:1209–1216PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Selim M (2007) Perioperative stroke. N Engl J Med 356:706–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Van de Beek D, Drake JM, Tunkel AR (2010) Nosocomial bacterial meningitis. N Engl J Med 362:146–154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Myers SR, McGuirl J, Wang J (2013) Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic gastric bypass: comparison of short-term outcomes. Obes Surg 23:467–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanoniv N, von Felten S, Schar G (2012) Robotic compared with conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 120(3):604–611PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN (2012) Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy—a comparative study. Int J Surg 10(9):475–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fourman MM, Saber AA (2012) Robotic bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Surg Obes Relat Dis 8(4):483–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Aloia TA, Fahy BN, Fischer CP et al (2009) Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database. HPB (Oxford) 11(6):510–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Matthews RD, Matthews RD, Anthony T et al (2007) Factors associated with postoperative complications and hernia recurrence for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair: a report from the VA Cooperative Hernia Study Group. Am J Surg 194(5):611–617PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dexter SP, Martin IG, Marton J, McMahon MJ (1997) Long operation and the risk of complications from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 84(4):464–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sousa AD, Salles JM, Soares JM, Moraes GM, Carvalho JR, Savassi-Rocha PR (2012) Predictors factors for post-thryroidectomy hypocalcaemia. Rev Col Bras Cir 39(6):476–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Liverani A, Chiarot M, Bezzi M, Angelini L (1994) Is surgery duration really a complication factor? Minerva Chir 49(9):747–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scheer A, Martel G, Moloo H et al (2009) Laparoscopic colon surgery: does operative time matter? Dis Colon Rectum 52(10):1746–1752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ball CG, Pitt HA, Kilbane ME, Dixon E, Sutherland FR, Lillemoe KD (2010) Peri-operative blood transfusion and operative time are quality indicators for pancreatoduodenectomy. HPB(Oxford) 12(7):465–471Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Procter LD, Davenport DL, Bernard AC, Zwischenberger JB (2010) General surgical operative duration is associated with increased risk-adjusted infectious complication rates and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Surg 210(1):60–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Pessaux P, Msika S, Atalla D, Hay JM, Flamant Y (2003) Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in noncolorectal abdominal surgery: a multivariate analysis based on a prospective multicenter study of 4718 patients. Arch Surg 138(3):314–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Giger UF, Michel JM, Opitz I, Th Inderbitzin D, Kocher T, Krähenbühl L (2006) Risk factors for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: analysis of 22,953 consecutive cases from the Swiss Association of Laparoscopic and Thoracoscopic Surgery database. J Am Coll Surg 203(5):723–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morino M, Toppino M, Forestieri P, Angrisani L, Allaix ME, Scopinaro N (2007) Mortality after bariatric surgery: analysis of 13,871 morbidly obese patients from a national registry. Ann Surg 246(6):1002–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS (2006) Surgical risk factors, morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 203(6):865–877PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Evans C, Lim J, Gatzen C, Huang A (2012) Factors influencing laparoscopic colorectal operative duration and its effect on clinical outcome. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 22(5):437–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tan TW, Kalish JA, Hamburg NM et al (2012) Shorter duration of femoral-popliteal bypass is associated with decreased surgical site infection and shorter hospital length of stay. J Am Coll Surg 215(4):512–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lin Y, Chen J, Wang Z (2012) Meta-analysis of factors which influence delirium following cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 27(4):481–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Noordzjj PG, Poldermans D, Schouten O, Bax JJ, Schreiner F, Boersma E (2010) Postoperative mortality in the Netherlands: a population-based analysis of surgery-specific risk in adults. Anesthesiology 112(5):1105–1115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB (2009) Variation in hospital mortality associated with inpatient surgery. N Engl J Med 361:1368–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cruse PJE, Foord R (1973) A five-year prospective study of 23,649 surgical wounds. Arch Surg 107:206–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shapiro M, Muñoz A, Tager IB, Schoenbaum SC, Polk BF (1982) Risk factors for infection at the operative site after abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy. N Engl J Med 307:1661–1666PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Galandiuk S, Polk HC, Jagelman DG, Fazio VW (1989) Re-emphasis of priorities in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Gyencol Obstet 169:219–222Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Saleh K, Olson M, Resig S et al (2002) Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance program. J Orthop Res 20:506–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Mangram AJ, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR (1999) Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 27:97–132PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ad Hoc Committee on Trauma, National Research Council, Division of Medical Sciences (1964) Organization, methods, and physical factors. Chapter III organization, methods, and physical factors of the study. Ann Surg 160(Suppl 2):19–31Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cruse PJ, Foord R (1980) The epidemiology of wound infection: a 10-year prospective study of 62939 wounds. Surg Clin North Am 60:27–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Service PHL (1960) Incidence of surgical wound infection in England and Wales: a report of the Public Health Laboratory Service. Lancet 2:658Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fogarty BJ, Khan K, Ashall G, Leonard AG (1999) Complications of long operations: a prospective study of morbidity associated with prolonged operative time. Br J Plast Surg 52:33–36PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Fortier J, Chung F, Su J (1997) Unanticipated admission after ambulatory surgery: a prospective study. Can J Anaesth 45:612Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Haeck PC, Swanson JA, Iverson RE et al (2009) Evidence-based patient safety advisory: patient selection and procedures in ambulatory surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(suppl 4):6S–27SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Mandal A, Imran D, McKinnell T et al (2005) Unplanned admissions following ambulatory plastic surgery—a retrospective study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 87:466–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ellsworth WA, Basi CB, Iverson RE (2009) Perioperative considerations for patient safety during cosmetic surgery—preventing complications. Can J Plast Surg 17:9–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fleisher LA, Pasternak LR, Lyles A (2007) A novel index of elevated risk of inpatient hospital admission immediately following outpatient surgery. Arch Surg 142:262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mattila K, Toivonen J, Janhunen L, Rosenberg PH, Hynynen M (2005) Postdischarge symptoms after ambulatory surgery: first week incidence, intensity and risk factors. Anesth Analg 101:1643–1650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W et al (1998) The Department of Veteran Affairs NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. Ann Surg 228:491–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Khuri SF, Henderson WF, Daley J et al (2008) Successful implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the private sector: the Patient Safety in Surgery study. Ann Surg 248:329–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Khuri SF (2005) The NSQIP: a new frontier in surgery. Surgery 138:837–843PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Stuckler D, Feigl AB, Basu S, McKee M (2010) The political economy of universal health coverage. Background paper for the First Global Symposium on Health Systems Research, 16–19 November 2010, Montreaux, Switzerland. Pacific Health Summit. Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research. Available at http://www.pacifichealthsummit.org/downloads/UHC/the%20political%20economy%20of%20uhc.PDF. Accessed April 4 2013
  64. 64.
    Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2010) Patient protection and affordable care act Pub. L. no, 111–148 § 3025(a), 124 Stat. 119,408Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Cabie A, Feiiting C, Farkas JC et al (1992) Influence of surgery on in-vitro cytokine production by human monocytes. Cytokine 4:576–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Lundy J, Cm F (1983) Surgery, trauma and immune suppression. Evolving the mechanism. Ann Surg 197:434–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Baxevanis CN, Papilas K, Dedoussis GV, Pavlis T, Papamichail M (1994) Abnormal cytokine serum levels correlate with impaired cellular immune responses are surgery. Clin Immunol Immunopathol 71:82–88PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chalhoub V, Pottecher J, Asehnoune K, Mazoit JX, Duranteau J, Benhamou D (2001) Cytokine response and reactive oxygen species production after low- and intermediate-risk surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55:549–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Adembri C, Kastamoniti E, Bertolozzi L et al (2004) Pulmonary injury follows systemic inflammatory reaction in infrarenal aortic surgery. Crit Care Med 32:1170–1177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Cohn DM, Hermanides J, DeVries JH et al (2012) Stress-induced hyperglycaemia and venous thromboembolism following total hip or total knee arthroplasty: analysis from the RECORD trials. Thromb Haemost 107(2):225–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kopelman TR, O’Neill PJ, Kanneganti SR et al (2008) The relationship of plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin A1C levels among nondiabetic trauma patients. J Trauma 64:30–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Karunakar MA, Staples KS (2010) Does stress-induced hyperglycemia increase the risk of perioperative infectious complications in orthopaedic trauma patients? J Orthop Trauma 24(12):752–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aksharananda Rambachan
    • 1
  • Lauren M. Mioton
    • 2
  • Sujata Saha
    • 1
  • Neil Fine
    • 1
  • John Y. S. Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Feinberg School of MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoUSA
  2. 2.Vanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations