Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gynecomastia treatment using radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Male gynecomastia is a commonly occurring aesthetic concern. Traditional liposuction, laser and ultrasound-assisted liposuction have many limitations, and excisional gynecomastia procedures can leave undesirable scars in the treatment of the enlarged male breast.

Methods

In this study, the authors report the use of radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL) in the treatment of male gynecomastia. A total of 59 males had their gynecomastia treated by RFAL technology, 47/59 by closed RFAL alone, and an additional 12 patients with RFAL combined with our personal technique of trans-mammillary glandular reduction. The RFAL device afforded strong RF current and thermal energy for glandular and adipose coagulation and liquefaction, together with strong soft tissue contraction forces.

Results

All patients were followed for more than 12 months, and all reported good to excellent breast contour results. There was one seroma and over 90 % of patients report being very happy with their contour, and no secondary surgical procedures were necessary. The authors report RFAL as new and potentially powerful option in the treatment of male gynecomastia, having the advantages of strong coagulation, liquefaction and aspiration of glandular tissue, simultaneous coagulation and aspiration with constant thermal monitoring, and very strong soft tissue contraction, eliminating the need for skin resection in the majority of cases. In minority of cases where there may be remnant glandular structures following RFAL, a simple, minimally intrusive trans-mammillary glandular extraction technique can be deployed that leaves minimal scarring.

Conclusions

The mixed technique presented in this study appears to be safe and effective. The RFAL mixed technique has proven to be superior to ultrasonic and power-assisted liposuction due to the skin contraction, having no limitation dependent on the quality of the patient’s skin.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mladick RA (2004) Continuing medical education article—body contouring, gynecomastia. Aesthetic Surg J 24(5):471–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ersek RA, Schaeferele M III, Beckham PH, Salisbury MA (2000) Gynecomastia: a clinical review. Aesthetic Surg J 20(5):381–386

    Google Scholar 

  3. Filho DH, Arruda RG, Alonso N (2006) Treatment of severe gynecomastia (Grade III) by resection of periareolar skin. Aesthetic Surg J 26(6):669–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mentz HA, Ruiz-Razura A, Newall G, Patronella CK, Miniel LA (2007) Pectoral etching: a method for augmentation, delineation, and contouring the thoracic musculature in men. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7):2051–2055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamas RS, Williams CW (1998) A sharp cutting liposuction cannula for gynecomastia. Aesthetic Surg J 1(4):261–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lista F, Ahmad J (2008) Power-assisted liposuction and the pull-through technique for the treatment of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 121(3):741–747

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ratnam BV (2009) A new classification and treatment protocol for gynecomastia. Aesthetic Surg J 29(1):26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Apfelberg DB, Rosenthal S, Hunstad JP, Achauer B, Fodor PB (1994) Progress report on multicenter study of laser-assisted liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 18(3):259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Blugerman G, Schavelzon D (2003) Mixed gynecomastia, reduction by laserlipolisis and transmammilar adenectomy. Am J Cosmet Surg 20(4): 233–238

    Google Scholar 

  10. Simon BB, Hoffman S, Kahn S (1973) Classification and surgical correction of gynecomastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 51:48–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Waldman A (2009) Scientific report: comparison of treatment uniformity of laser assisted liposuction (LAL) and radiofrequency assisted liposuction (RFAL). MedEsthetics 2(3):39–41

    Google Scholar 

  12. Paul M, Mulholland RS (2009) A new approach for adipose tissue treatment and body contouring using radiofrequency-assisted liposuction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33(5):687–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Blugerman G, Schalvezon D, Malcolm D, Paul MD (2010) A safety and feasibility study of a novel radiofrequency-assisted liposuction technique. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(3):998–1006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mulholland RS (2009) An in-depth examination of radiofrequency assisted liposuction (RFAL). J Cosmet Surg Med 4(3):14–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Dr. Blugerman and Dr. Schavelzon received the device at no charge to conduct some studies. Dr. Mulholland is a paid consultant of Invasix and received the device at no charge to conduct some studies. Dr. Soto and Dr. Siguen have no conflict of interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guillermo Blugerman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blugerman, G., Schalvezon, D., Mulholland, R.S. et al. Gynecomastia treatment using radiofrequency-assisted liposuction (RFAL). Eur J Plast Surg 36, 231–236 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0772-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0772-5

Keywords

Navigation