Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative assessment of sural nerve donor site sensitivity: one week and one year after surgery

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The use of autologous nerve material has become the gold standard for reconstructing peripheral nerve defects. For various applications, nerve grafting is required to restore nerve continuity, and the sural nerve may be considered the best option for such purposes. The aim of this study was to quantitatively assess the recovery of donor site sensory deficit following sural nerve harvest.

Methods

This descriptive study was performed on 30 patients in the first week after surgery and 23 patients 1 year after sural nerve harvest. Mapping of the affected area was performed using Semmes–Weinstein monofilaments. Then, the areas of diminished or loss of sensation were evaluated with monofilament test, static and dynamic two-point discrimination, and temperature sensitivity. Also, the complaints of paresthesia, numbness, and pain were measured. The results were compared in the two groups.

Results

The area of diminished or loss of sensation 1 week after surgery was significantly reduced after 1 year (p = 0.000). A reduction was observed in the patients' complaints, especially in numbness and paresthesia, and better results were obtained in clinical findings, significantly in dynamic two-point discrimination and temperature sensation.

Conclusion

In this study, donor site adverse effects of sural nerve harvest decreased over time, and improvements in sensory tests were observed; however, more studies should be performed on this topic.

Level of Evidence: Level III, diagnostic study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ray WZ, Mackinnon SE (2010) Management of nerve gaps: autografts, allografts, nerve transfers, and end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Exp Neurol 223(1):77–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fatemi MJ, Foroutan KS, Ashtiani AK, Mansoori MJ, Vaghardoost R, Pedram S, Hosseinpolli A, Rajabi F, Mousavi SJ (2010) Comparison of divided sciatic nerve growth within dermis, venous and nerve graft conduit in rat. J Res Med Sci 15(4):208–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yavuzer R, Yavuzer G, Ergin S, Latifoğlu O (2002) Gait analysis: a new perspective on sural nerve graft donor site morbidity assessment. Ann Plast Surg 48(4):449–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Park HD, Kwak HH, Hu KS, Han SH, Fontaine C, Kim HJ (2007) Topographic and histologic characteristics of the sural nerve for use in nerve grafting. J Craniofac Surg 18(6):1434–1438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. van Ouwerkerk WJ (1999) Endoscopy-assisted sural nerve harvest in infants. Childs Nerv Syst 15(4):192–195, Discussion, 196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lapid O, Ho ES, Goia C, Clarke HM (2007) Evaluation of the sensory deficit after sural nerve harvesting in pediatric patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(2):670–674

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schubert HM, Wechselberger G, Hussl H, Schoeller T (2005) Peroneal nerve lesion after sural nerve graft harvest: an unusual complication–case report. Microsurgery 25(1):54–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lin CH, Mardini S, Levin SL, Lin YT, Yeh JT (2007) Endoscopically assisted sural nerve harvest for upper extremity posttraumatic nerve defects: an evaluation of functional outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 119(2):616–626

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miloro M, Stoner JA (2005) Subjective outcomes following sural nerve harvest. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63(8):1150–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martins RS, Barbosa RA, Siqueira MG, Soares MS, Heise CO, Foroni L, Teixeira (2012) Morbidity following sural nerve harvesting: a prospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. doi:10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.02.045

  11. Ehretsman RL, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE (1999) Subjective recovery of nerve graft donor site. Ann Plast Surg 43(6):606–612

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dros J, Wewerinke A, Bindels PJ, van Weert HC (2009) Accuracy of monofilament testingto diagnose peripheral neuropathy: a systemic review. Ann Fam Med 7(6):555–558

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Booth J, Young MJ (2000) Differences in the performance of commercially available 10-g monofilaments. Diabetes Care 23(7):984–988

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Collins S, Visscher P, De Vet HC, Zuurmond WW, Perez RS (2010) Reliability of the Semmes Weinstein monofilaments to measure coetaneous sensibility in the feet of healthy subjects. Disabil Rehabil 32(24):2019–2027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Birke JA, Brandsma JW, Schreuders TA, Piefer A (2000) Sensory testing with monofilaments in Hansen's disease and normal control subjects. Int J Lepr Other Mycobact Dis 68(3):291–298

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Aszmann OC, Muse V, Dellon AL (1996) Evidence in support of collateral sprouting after sensory nerve resection. Ann Plast Surg 37(5):520–525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital and Burn Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohammad Javad Fatemi & Hossein Akbari

  2. Burn Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Shahrzad Taghavi

  3. Community Medicine, Burn Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Mohsen Saberi

  4. Burn Research Center and Hazrat Fatemeh Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Sahar Amini & Mitra Niazi

Authors
  1. Mohammad Javad Fatemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hossein Akbari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shahrzad Taghavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mohsen Saberi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sahar Amini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mitra Niazi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Javad Fatemi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fatemi, M.J., Akbari, H., Taghavi, S. et al. Quantitative assessment of sural nerve donor site sensitivity: one week and one year after surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 36, 31–35 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0741-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-012-0741-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation