Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Capsular contracture in subfascial breast augmentation: recommendations and treatment

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Capsular contracture is the most common long-term complication of breast augmentation. In subfascial breast augmentation, there had been reports of 0% to 2% of capsular contracture (Serra-Renom et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 116:640–645; Ventura and Marcello, Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:379–383; Tijerina et al., Aesthetic Plast Surg 34:16–22; Graf et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 111(2):904–908). Graf et al. mentioned a 2.3% of capsular contracture grade II in 263 patients that underwent subfascial breast augmentation (Graf et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 111(2):904–908). There are several theories that can explain the presence of a capsular contracture, and the most described are: the microbiology theory and the contamination of the pocket due to a foreign body (Araco et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6): 1808–1819; Schaub et al., Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6): 2140–2149). In 5 years, 35 patients with breast augmentation were considered for surgical treatment for capsular contracture. From 35 patients, only 4 patients were operated by us initially, the remaining 31 came to us as new patients with a capsular contracture. Each patient had different characteristics and was classified with the Baker scale. Depending on the grade (I–IV) and clinical characteristics of the patient, the surgical treatment was selected between a subcapsular pocket, total capsulectomy with or without implant, or radiation of the capsule. Thirty-five patients were considered for surgical treatment for a capsular contracture. All of our patients had great outcome at short and long term without any signs of complications. Twenty-seven patients were followed for 2 years postop, and 8 patients treated with a subcapsular pocket have less than 2 years of follow-up. In patients with less mammary gland tissue, a subcapsular pocket had reduced the risk of complications of a total capsulectomy due to close relationship between the skin and the capsule. There are several complications that could be present with a total capsulectomy, which are: tissue necrosis, breast irregularities, and/or damage to the skin. This technique had produced great results in patients with lo mammary tissue and a capsular contracture. Capsular contracture is the most common long-term complication in breast augmentation. There are several techniques that can be reproduced to have better outcomes and reduce the risk of complications. We recommend the use of these strategies to help in the treatment of capsular contracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Serra-Renom J, Garrido MF, Yoon T (2005) Augmentation mammoplasty with anatomical soft, cohesive silicone implant using the transaxillary approach at a subfascial level with endoscopic assistance. Plast Reconstr Surg 116:640–645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ventura OD, Marcello GA (2005) Anatomic and physiologic advantages of totally subfascial breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg 29:379–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tijerina VN, Saenz RA, Garcia-Guerrero J (2010) Experience of 1,000 cases in subfascial breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 34(1):16–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Araco A, Caruso R, Araco F, Overton J, Gravante G (2009) Capsular contractures: a systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(6):1808–1819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schaub TA, Ahmad J, Rohdrich RJ (2010) Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: saline versus silicone—a systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(6):2140–2149

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Teitelbaum S (2009) The inframammary approach to breast augmentation. Clin Plast Surg 36(1):33–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fanous N, Tawilé C, Brousseau VJ (2008) Minimal inframammary incision for breast augmentation. Can J Plast Surg 16(1):14–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Graf RM, Bernardes A, Rippel R (2003) Subfascial breast implant: a new procedure. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(2):904–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gherardini G, Zaccheddu R, Milner SM, El-Shazlyl M, Liapakis I (2006) Breast augmentation with silicone implants: the role of surgical drainage—report on 502 consecutive patients. Eur J Plast Surg 29(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest within the creation of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Victor Elizondo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elizondo, V., Elizondo, R.A. Capsular contracture in subfascial breast augmentation: recommendations and treatment. Eur J Plast Surg 35, 527–532 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0682-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0682-y

Keywords

Navigation