Abstract
This study was conducted to review the results of the open sky approach to frontalis suspension surgery for upper eyelid ptosis and reduced levator function. A retrospective, non-comparative audit in which all patients undergoing open sky approach frontalis suspension surgery with full-thickness skin crease incision and tarsal fixation of suspension material (SM). Outcomes reported include: upper eyelid height, pretarsal show, skin crease depth and contour based on postoperative standardised photographs. We reviewed 616 consecutive ptosis procedures over a 5-year period, of which 31 involved frontalis suspension (18 patients: seven female, 11 male). Mean age was 45.7 ± 26.7 years. SMs used included: silicon rod (n = 21), autogenous fascia lata (n = 8) and polytetrafluoroethylene (n = 2). Upper eyelid height significantly improved from 1.12 ± 1.2 to 3.2 ± 1.3 mm post-surgery (P ≤ 0.0001). Pretarsal show was significantly higher preoperatively (7.4 ± 2.3 mm) compared to postoperative measurements (5.6 ± 2.4 mm) (P = 0.005). Of the total cases, 84% had an improvement in skin crease depth, with 40.6% having postoperative symmetry with the contralateral eyelid. A sectoral droop, flattened and normal contour were seen in 12.9%, 22.9% and 58.1% post-surgery compared with 22.9%, 61.3% and 12.9% pre-surgery. The surgical revision rate was 16.1%, indications included: undercorrection (n = 3), stitch granuloma (n = 1) and wound dehiscence (n = 1). All cases requiring revision surgery had undergone unilateral surgery with silicon rod. The open sky approach significantly improves upper eyelid height and pretarsal show. In addition, the depth and height of the skin crease are improved and in cases of both unilateral and bilateral surgery this technique produces good symmetry.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dransart HN (1880) Un cas de blépharoptose opéré par un procédé spécial à l’auteur. Ann Oculist 84:88
Hashemi H, KhabazKhoob M, Yazdani K, Mehravaran S, Mohammad K, Fotouhi A (2010) White-to-white corneal diameter in the Tehran Eye Study. Cornea 29(1):9–12
www.xlstat.com accessed online, Accessed 06/11/2010.
Payr E (1909) Plastik Mittels freier Faszien transplantation bei Ptosis med Verein Freifswald. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 35:822
Crawford J (1977) Repair of ptosis using frontalis muscle and fascia lata: a 20-year review. Ophthalmic Surg 8:31–40
Beard C (1978) Advancements in ptosis surgery. Clin Plast Surg 5(4):537–545
Kemp EG, James CR, Collin JR (1986) Brow suspension in the management of ptosis: an analysis of over 100 cases. Trans Ophthalmol Soc 105(Pt 1):84–87
Lam D, Ng JSK, Cheng GPM, Li RTH (1998) Autogenous Palmaris longus tendon as frontalis suspension material for ptosis correction in children. Am J Ophthalmol 126:109–115
Wasserman B, Sprunger DT, Helveston EM (2001) Comparison of materials used in frontalis suspension. Arch Ophthalmol 119:687–691
Can I, Can B, Yarangümeli A, Inan Y, Kural G (1996) Ptosis surgery using Mersilene mesh suspensory material. Eur J Ophthalmol 6(2):150–154
Downes RN, Collin JR (1990) The Mersilene mesh ptosis sling. Eye (Lond) 4(3):456–463
Hintschich CR, Zürcher M, Collin JR (1995) Mersilene mesh brow suspension: efficiency and complications. Mersilene mesh brow suspension: efficiency and complications. Br J Ophthalmol 79(4):358–361
Detorakis ET, Tsilimbaris MK (2009) Successful conservative management of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene band exposure in frontalis suspension. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 25(5):416–417
Wei YH, Liao SL (2009) Frontalis suspension using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: results of different surgical designs. J Formos Med Assoc 108(12):943–949
Zweep H, Spauwen PH (1992) Evaluation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) and autogenous fascia lata in frontalis suspension: a comparative clinical study. Acta Chir Plast 34:129–137
Garrott H, Aristodemou P, Sinclair N, Lane C, Harrad R (2010) Long-term efficacy of 2–0 Prolene brow suspensions for congenital ptosis. Eye (Lond) 24(1):175–177
Carter S, Meecham WJ, Steiff SR (1996) Silicone frontalis slings for the correction of blepharoptosis: indications and efficacy. Ophthalmology 103:623–630
Goldberger S, Conn H, Lemor M (1991) Double rhomboid silicone rod frontalis suspension. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 7:48–53
Lamont M, Tyers AG (2010) Silicone sling allows adjustable ptosis correction in children and in adults at risk of corneal exposure. Orbit 29(2):102–105
O’Reilly J, Lanigan B, Bowell R, O’Keefe M (1998) Congenital ptosis: long-term results using stored fascia lata. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 76(3):346–348
Patrinely J, Anderson RL (1986) The septal pulley in frontalis suspension. Arch Ophthalmol 104:1707–1710
Mauriello JJ, Abdelsalam A (1998) Effectiveness of homologous cadaveric fascia lata and role of suture fixation to tarsus in frontalis suspension. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14:99–104
Fox SA (1968) A new frontalis skin sling for ptosis. Am J Ophthalmol 65(3):359–362
Lelli GJ Jr, Musch DC, Frueh BR, Nelson CC (2009) Outcomes in silicone rod frontalis suspension surgery for high-risk noncongenital blepharoptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 25(5):361–365
Ben Simon GJ, Macedo AA, Schwarcz RM, Wang DY, McCann JD, Goldberg RA (2005) Frontalis suspension for upper eyelid ptosis: evaluation of different surgical designs and suture material. Am J Ophthalmol 140(5):877–885
Dailey R, Wilson DJ, Wobig JL (1991) Transconjunctival frontalis suspension (TCFS). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 7:289–297
Loff H, Wobig JL, Dailey RA (1999) Transconjunctival frontalis suspension: a clinical evaluation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 15:349–354
DeMartelaere SL, Blaydon SM, Cruz AA, Amato MM, Shore JW (2007) Broad fascia fixation enhances frontalis suspension. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 23(4):279–284
El-Toukhy E, Salaem M, El-Shewy T, Abou-Steit M, Levine M (2001) Mersilene mesh sling as an alternative to autogenous fascia lata in the management of ptosis. Eye (Lond) 15(2):178–182
Leone CJ, Shore JW, Van-Gemert JV (1981) Silicone rod frontalis sling for the correction of blepharoptosis. Ophthalmic Surg 12:881–887
Leibovitch I, Leibovitch L, Dray JP (2003) Long-term results of frontalis suspension using autogenous fascia lata for congenital ptosis in children under 3 years of age. Am J Ophthalmol 136:866–871
Yagci A, Egrilmez S (2003) Comparison of cosmetic results in frontalis sling operations: the eyelid crease incision versus the supralash stab incision. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 40(4):213–216
Bagheri A, Aletaha M, Saloor H, Yazdani S (2007) A randomized clinical trial of two methods of fascia lata suspension in congenital ptosis. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 23(3):217–221
Katowitz JA (1979) Frontalis suspension in congenital ptosis using a polyfilament, cable-type suture. Arch Ophthalmol 97(9):1659–1663
Metha P, Patel P, Olver JM (2004) Functional results and complications of Polyester mesh use for frontalis suspension ptosis surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 88:361–364
Wagner R, Mauriello JA Jr, Nelson LB et al (1984) Treatment of congenital ptosis with frontalis suspension: a comparison of suspensory materials. Ophthalmology 91:245–248
Morris CL, Buckley EG, Enyedi LB, Stinnett S, Freedman SE (2008) Safety and efficacy of silicone rod frontalis suspension surgery for childhood ptosis repair. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 45(5):280–288
Conflicts of interest
The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interests nor do the authors have any financial declarations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Norris, J.H., Malhotra, R. The open sky approach to brow suspension surgery. Eur J Plast Surg 35, 433–440 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0629-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-011-0629-3