Abstract
Random flaps have been supplanted by more immediate and reliable reconstructive methods because the former require two or more procedures and a period of delay. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a random flap can be elevated, delayed, and safely divided within 4 days. Ninety-two Sprague–Dawley rats were operated by elevating an 8 cm × 4 cm cranially based dorsal flap with its underlying panniculus carnosus muscle. The rats were divided into four groups, one control and three experimental, with 23 rats in each. In the control group, the flap was elevated and its caudal end divided at the same time without delay. In the experimental groups, we tested three delay procedures and all flaps had their caudal end divided 4 days after elevation. The number of flaps showing total viability compared to the flaps showing any amount of necrosis was as follows: control group 1:22, mini delay group 18:5, progressive craniocaudal elevation group 19:4, and the accelerated delay group 22:1. The extent of necrosis, expressed as mean percentage area of necrosis in each group, was as follows: control group 45.9%, in the mini delay group 2.3%, progressive craniocaudal elevation group 2.5%, and the accelerated delay group 0.1%. Delay of this random flap can be accomplished safely in 4 days. In terms of total flap survival and mean percentage necrosis, all three experimental delay procedures were effective in improving total viability and reducing the extent of necrosis significantly. We believe the observed difference in total viability and mean percentage necrosis in the accelerated delay group to be clinically significant.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
McFarlane RM, DeYoung G, Henry RA (1965) The design of a pedicle flap in the rat to study necrosis and its prevention. Plast Reconstr Surg 35(1):177–182
Callegari PR, Taylor GI, Minabe T (1992) An anatomic review of the delay phenomenon: I. Experimental studies. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:397
German W, Finesilver EM, Davis JS (1933) Establishment of circulation in tubed skin grafts. Arch Surg 26:27
McFarlane EM, Heagy FC, Radin S, Aust JC, Weemuth EB (1965) A study of the delay phenomenon in experimental pedicle flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 35(3):245–262
Pang CY, Forrest CR, Neligan PC, Lindsay WK (1986) Augmentation of blood flow in delayed random skin flaps in the pig: effect of length of delay period and angiogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 78(1):68–74
Myers BM, Cherry G (1967) Augmentation of tissue survival by delay: an experimental study in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 39:397
Myers BM, Cherry G (1969) Mechanism of the delay phenomenon. Plast Reconstr Surg 44:52
Myers BM, Cherry G (1971) Differences in the delay phenomenon in the rabbit, rat and pig. Plast Reconstr Surg 47:73
Taylor GI, Corlett RJ, Caddy CM, Zelt RG (1992) An anatomic review of the delay phenomenon: II. Clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 89:408
Morris SF, Taylor GI (1995) The time sequence of the delay phenomenon: when is a surgical delay effective? An experimental study. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:526
Dahr SC, Taylor GI (1999) The delay phenomenon: the story unfolds. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:2079
Hurn IL, Fisher JC, Arganese T, Rudolph R (1983) Standardization of the dorsal rat flap model. Ann Plast Surg 11:210
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shehadi, I.E., Shehadi, S.I., Shehadi, R.R. et al. Accelerated delay of random flaps in a rat model. Eur J Plast Surg 33, 361–367 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0518-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0518-1