Skip to main content

Ultrasound diagnosis of breast implant rupture: beware the atypical presentation and interpret with care

Abstract

Rupture of silicone breast implants is a recognised complication. We report a 36-year-old lady that 16 years post-augmentation presented with a unilateral gradually swollen breast with no associated lymphadenopathy. Ultrasound examination reported implant rupture, and exchange of implants was subsequently performed, only to reveal serous fluid (negative to culture, cytology and microscopy) and a macroscopically intact implant. A review of the literature has revealed that other imaging modalities are, either in isolation or in combination, more sensitive and specific for implant rupture. We therefore aim to raise awareness of this in the hope that we can potentially prevent further unnecessary operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Roman S, Perkins D (2005) Progressive spontaneous unilateral enlargement of the breast twenty-two years after prosthetic breast augmentation. Br J Plas Surg 58:88–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA (1997) Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae and diagnosis. Lancet 350(9090):1531–1537

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ahn CY, DeBruhl ND, Gorzcyca DP, Shaw WW, Bassett LW (1994) Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging: experience with 59 implants. Plast Reconst Surg 94(5):620–627

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikeda DM, Borofsky HB, Herfkens RJ, Sawyer-Glover AM, Birdwell RL, Glover GH (1999) Silicone breast implant rupture: Pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging and relative efficacies of magnetic resonance, mammography and ultrasound. PRS 104(7):2054–2062

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Scaranelo AM, Marques AF, Smialowski EB, Lederman HM (2004) Evaluating the rupture of silicone breast implants by mammography, ultrasonography and MRI in asymptomatic patients: correlation with surgical findings. São Paulo Med J 122(2):41–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bantick GL, Taggart I (1995) Mammography and breast implants. Br J Plast Surg 48:49–52

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Hamper UM, Sheth S, Chang BW, Anderson ND (1999) Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of ultrasound, MR imaging, mammographic and histopathologic findings. Radiographics 19:S39–S51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Samuels JB, Rohrich RJ, Weatherall PT, Ho AM, Goldberg KL (1995) Radiographic diagnosis of breast implant rupture: current status and comparison of techniques. Plast Reconst Surg 96(4):865–877

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Royal College of Radiologists (2007) Making the best use of clinical radiology services; referral guidelines, 6th edn, B15; 40–41. The Royal College of Radiologists, London. Assessment of integrity of silicone breast implants

Download references

Conflict of interests

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus J. Davis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis, M.J., Gore, S.M. & Papanastasiou, S. Ultrasound diagnosis of breast implant rupture: beware the atypical presentation and interpret with care. Eur J Plast Surg 34, 297–298 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0457-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-010-0457-x

Keywords

  • Breast
  • Implant
  • Rupture
  • Imaging
  • Swelling