Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

One-stage prefabrication for composite tissue defects including two different tissue layers using high-density porous polyethylene and acellular dermal matrix

  • Experimental Study
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Functional and three-dimensional reconstruction of lost or deformed body parts is the main aim of plastic surgery. Many techniques can and have been used for this purpose. Prefabrication can be used to reduce donor site morbidity. Although prefabrication reduces donor site morbidity, it usually requires multistage operations especially for composite defects. We report the prefabrication of two different implants in one stage using high-density porous polyethylene and acellular dermal matrix in rats, since these materials do not require an immediate blood supply. Before surgery, a high-density porous polyethylene layer and a 2 × 1cm acellular dermal matrix were prepared and sutured to each other. The femoral artery, vein, and nerve were used as a pedicle. The pedicle was placed and anchored underneath the implants; in order to prevent neovascularization from another source, this complex was wrapped in a silicone sheet. A total of ten implants were prefabricated. Six weeks after the surgery, the implants were evaluated macroscopically and histologically. Macroscopic and histological examinations showed that two different implants could be prefabricated in one stage for composite defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozdemir R, Kocer U, Tiftikçioğlu YO et al (2005) Axial pattern composite prefabrication of high-density porous polyethylene: experimental and clinical research. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(1):183–196

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Can Z, Erçöçen AR, Apaydın I et al (2000) Tissue engineering of high-density porous polyethylene implant for three-dimensional reconstruction: an experimental study. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 34:9–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nathan DS (2002) Implants, soft tissue, alloderm. http://www.emedicine.com/ent/topic733.htm.June 20

  4. Gore DC (2005) Utility of acellular dermis in the care of elderly burn patients. J Surg Res 125(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Agag RL, Granick MS, Omidi M et al (2004) Neurosurgical reconstruction with acellular cadaveric dermal matrix. Ann Plast Surg 52(6):571–577

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butler CE, Prieto VG (2004) Reduction of adhesions with composite alloderm/polypropylene mesh implants for abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 114(2):464–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kostakoğlu N, Manek S, Green CJ (1997) The development of neovascularization in flap prefabrication with vascular implantation: an experimental study. Br J Plast Surg 50:428–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tezel E, Numanoğlu A, Bayramiçli M et al (2000) Fat prefabrication using a fascial flap in the rat model. Br J Plast Surg 53:155–160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tark KC, Chung S, Shin KS et al (2000) Skin flap prefabrication using acellular dermal matrix an cultured keratinocytes in a porcine model. Ann Plast Surg 44(4):392–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ozdemir OM, Serel S, Gokrem S et al (2004) Three-dimensional orthotopic reconstruction with a free, prefabricated high-density porous polyethylene implant flap. Turk J Trauma Emerg Surg 10(2):75–82

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yaremchuk MJ (2003) Facial Skeletal reconstruction using porous polyethylene implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 111(6):1818–1827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Niechajev I (1999) Porous polyethylene implants for nasal reconstruction: clinical and histologic studies. Aesthet Plast Surg 23:395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Castor SA, To WC, Papay FA (1999) Lip augmentation with Alloderm acellular allogenic dermatofat autograft: a comparison with autologous fat injection alone. Aesthet Plast Surg 23(3):218–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones FR, Schwartz BM, Silverstien P (1996) Use of a non-immunogenic acellular dermal graft for soft tissue augmentation: a preliminary report. Aesthet Surg J 16:196–201

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kridel RW, Foda H, Lunde KC (1998) Septal perforation repair with acellular human dermal allograft. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(1):73–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Papel ID, Mabrie DC (1999) Deprojecting the nasal profile. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 32(1):65–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Romo T 3rd, Sclafani AP, Falk AN et al (1999) A graduated approach to the repair of nasal septal perforations. Plast Reconstr Surg 103(1):66–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sheridan R, Choucair R, Donelan M et al (1998) Acellular allodermis in burns surgery: 1-year results of a pilot trial. J Burn Care Rehabil 19(6):528–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Silverstein P (1997) Depressed scar revision: lifecell clinical case summary. LifeCell, Houston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Savaş Serel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serel, S., Uluç, A., Kaya, B. et al. One-stage prefabrication for composite tissue defects including two different tissue layers using high-density porous polyethylene and acellular dermal matrix. Eur J Plast Surg 31, 315–319 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-008-0275-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-008-0275-6

Keywords

Navigation