Skip to main content
Log in

Breast augmentation with silicone implants: the role of surgical drainage—report on 502 consecutive patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast augmentation is one of the most frequently performed cosmetic surgery procedures worldwide. We report on a series of 502 consecutive cosmetic breast augmentations by a single surgeon, using both the submuscular and submammary approaches. A vacuum drain was placed in the surgical pocket at the end of the procedure. The drain fluid collection was recorded immediately after the surgery and the following day before removal. A tenfold increase in the amount of fluid collection was noted in the drain’s reservoir. Thirteen patients presented with minor wound healing problems at the second postoperative follow-up, which were treated conservatively; two of them had the implant removed and replaced after 2 months. There were only two capsular contractions at 1-year follow-up. We focus our discussion on the drainage in the early postoperative period and conclude that the routine use of a surgical drainage reduces the risk for complications. Based on our findings, we advocate that short-term routine use of a surgical drain is advisable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnard JJ, Todd EL, Wilson WG, Mielcarek R, Rohrich RJ (1997) Distribution of organosilicon polymers in augmentation mammoplasties at autopsy. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Biggs T, Yarish RS (1990) Augmentation mammaplasty: a comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 85(3):368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brickman M, Parsa NN, Parsa FD (2004) Late hematoma after breast implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 28:80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown SL, Parmentier CM, Woo EK, Vishnuvajjala RL, Headrick ML (1998) Silicone gel breast implant adverse events reports to the Food and Drug Administration, 1984–1995. Public Health Rep 113:535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Burkhardt BR, Dempsey PD, Schnur PL, Tofield JJ (1986) Capsular Contracture: a prospective study of the effect of local antibacterial agents. Plast Reconstr Surg 77(6):919

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen SB, Rohrich RJ (1994) Evaluation of the patient with silicone gel breast implants and rheumatic complaints. Plast Reconstr Surg 94:120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fanous N, Salem I, Tawilé C, Bassas AE (2004) Absence of capsular contracture in 319 consecutive augmentation mammaplasties: dependent drains as a possible factor. Can J Plast Surg 12(4):193

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fiala TGS, Lee WPA, May JW (1993) Augmentation mammoplasty: results of a patient survey. Ann Plast Surg 30(6):503

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gutowski KA, Mesna GT, Cunningham BL (1997) Saline-filled breast implants: a plastic surgery educational foundation multicenter outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg 100(4):1019

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gylbert L, Asplund O, Jurell J (1990) Capsular contracture after breast reconstruction with silicone gel and saline filled implants. A 6-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 85:373

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Handel N, Jensen JA, Black Q, Waisman JR, Silverstain MJ (1995) The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hedén P, Jernbeck J, Hober M (2001) Breast augmentation with anatomical cohesive gel implants. The world’s largest current experience. Clin Plast Surg 28(3):531

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hipps CJ, Raju DR, Straith RE (1978) Influence of some operative and postoperative factors on capsular contracture around breast prostheses. Plast Reconstr Surg 61(3):384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matarasso A, Hutchinson O (2000) Augmentation mammaplasty: subpectoral augmentation using the periareolar or inframammary approach. In: Spear S (ed) Operative techniques in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia, PA 7(3):93

  15. Netscher DT, Weizer G, Wigoda P, Walker LE, Thomby J, Bowen D (1995) Clinical relevance of positive breast periprosthetic cultures without overt infection. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1125

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nyren O, Yin L, Josefsson S, McLaughlin JK, Blot WJ, Engqvist M, Hakelius L, Boice JD Jr, Adami HO (1998) Risk of connective tissue disease and related disorders among women with breast implants: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Sweden. Br Med J 316:417

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Puckett CL, Croll GH, Reichel CA, Concannon MJ (1987) A critical look at capsule contracture in subglandular versus subpectoral mammary augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11:23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rohrich RJ, Clark CP III (1993) Controversy over the silicone gel breast implant: current status and clinical implications. Tex Med 89:52

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rohrich RJ, Kenkel JM, Adams WP (1999) Preventing capsular contracture in breast augmentation: in search of the Holy Grail. Plast Reconstr Surg 103:1759

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rohrich R, Kenkel JM, Adams WP, Beran S, Conner WCH (2000) A prospective analysis of patients undergoing silicone breast implant explantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(7):2529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tebbetts JB (2002) Achieving a predictable 24-hour recovery following breast augmentation: Part I. Refining practices using motion and time study principles. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(1):273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tebbetts JB (2002) Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(1):293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vasquez B, Given KS, Houston C (1987) Breast augmentation: a review of subglandular and submuscular implantation. Aesthetic Plast Surg 11:101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Williams C, Aston S, Rees TD (1975) The effect of hematoma on the thickness of pseudosheets around silicone implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 56:194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We wish to thank Dr. Alan Matarasso, New York, NY, for the valuable criticism and improvement of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Gherardini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gherardini, G., Zaccheddu, R., Milner, S.M. et al. Breast augmentation with silicone implants: the role of surgical drainage—report on 502 consecutive patients. Eur J Plast Surg 29, 9–12 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-006-0064-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-006-0064-z

Keywords

Navigation