Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 178–181 | Cite as

Effects of low-power laser irradiation on survival of random skin flap in rats

  • M. BayatEmail author
  • M. R. Tabatabai
  • H. Shemshadi
Original Paper

Abstract

This research was designed to study the effects of low-power helium–neon (He–Ne) laser irradiation on random skin flap survival in rat. Fifty 50 male rats were randomly divided into five groups. On the dorsum of each rat, one full thickness random skin flap which contained no specific vessel was elevated. Groups 1 to 4 were exposed to different models of a low-power He–Ne laser. Group 5 rats received no laser treatment and were considered as the control group. The energy density of the He–Ne laser used was 0.2 J/cm2. Immediately after surgery and at day 7, the surface area of all flaps was determined. Histological and tensiometrical studies on the surviving part of the flaps were also performed. The data obtained were analyzed by ANOVA. The results showed a significant difference in the surface area of survival parts of flaps and density of blood vessels on day 7 between group 3 rats and the other groups (P=0.0188, P=0.0455). Low-power He–Ne laser irradiation of flaps without recognized blood vessels in rats, reduced vasospasm, produced vasodilation, and caused a significant increase in the surviving surface area.

Keywords

Random skin flaps Low-power laser Survival Tensile strength Histology Rat 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to the late Mrs Jamileh Rezaie for her intellectual assistance, to Dr Farouk Orej for his editorial assistance and to Jahad-e-Daneshgahi of Iran Medical Sciences University for their financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Amir A, Solomon AS, Giler S, Cordoba M, Hauben DJ (2000) The influence of helium-neon laser irradiation on the viability of skin flaps in rat. Br J Plast Surg 53:58–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cameron MH, Perez D, Otane-Lata S (1999) Electromagnetic Radiation. In: Cameron MH (ed) Physical Agents in Rehabilitation, From Research to Practice. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 316–321Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grabb WG, Oneal RM (1966) The effect of low molecular weight dextran on the survival of experimental skin flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 37:406–409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gribbe O, Lundeberg T, Samuelson UE, Wiklund NP (1997) Nitric oxide synthase activity and endothelial ultrastructure in ischemic skin-flaps. Br J Plast Surg 50:483–490CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gourgouliatos ZF, Welch AJ, Diller KR, Aggarwal SJ (1990) Laser irradiation-induced relaxation of blood vessels in vivo. Lasers Surg Med 10:524–532PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Im MJ, Kim YS, Edwards RJ, Hoopes JE, Fenselau A (1992) The effect of bovine basic fibroblast growth factor on skin flap survival in rats. Ann Plast Surg 28:242–245PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kami T, Yoshimura Y, Nakajima T, Ohshiro T, Fujino T (1985) Effects of low-power diode lasers on flap survival. Ann Plast Surg 14:278–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kana JS, Hutschen G, Haina D, Waidlich W (1981) Effect of low power density laser radiation on healing skin wound in rats. Arch Surg 116:293–296PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McGregor IA, Morgan G (1973) Axial random pattern flaps. Br J Plast Surg 26:202–213PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mes LG (1980) Improving flap survival by sustaining cell metabolism within ischemic cells: a study using rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 65:56–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mester E, Spiry T, Szende B, Tota JG (1971) Effect of laser rays on wound healing. Am J Surg 122:532–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Myers MB, Cherry G (1968) Causes of necrosis in pedicle flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 42:43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakajima T (1987) How soon do venous drainage develop at the periphery of a free flap? A study on rats. Br J Plast Surg 31:300–308Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Price MA, Pearl RM (1994) Multiagent pharmacotherapy to enhance skin flap survival: Lack of additive effect on nitroglycerine and allopurinol. Ann Plast Surg 33:52–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rochkind S, Rousso M, Nissan M, Villarreal M, Barrnea L, Rees DG (1989) Systemic effects of low power lasers irradiation on the peripheral and central nervous system, cutaneous wounds and burns. Laser Surgery Med 9:174–182Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saliba EN, Foreman H (1990) Low power lasers. In: Prenitic WE (ed) Therapeutic Modalities in Sport Medicine. Times Mirror, Mosby, St. Louis, pp 185–208Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Smith RJ, Birndorf M, Gluck G, Hammond D, Moore WD (1992) The effect of low energy laser on skin flap survival in the rat and porcine models. Plast Reconstr Surg 68:306–310Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Trelles MA, Mayayo E (1987) Bone fracture consolidates faster with low power laser. Laser Surg Med 71:36–45Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waters LM, Pearl RM, Macaulay RM (1989) A comparative analysis of the ability of five classes of pharmacological agents to augment skin flap survival in various models and species: An attempt to standardize skin flap Research. Ann Plast Surg 23:117–122PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Anatomy and Cell and Molecular Biology Research Center, Medical FacultyShaheed Beheshti University of Medical SciencesEvin, TehranIran
  2. 2.Hospital of National Iranian Company of OilAhvazIran
  3. 3.Department of Speech TherapyUniversity of Welfare and Rehabilitation SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations