Advertisement

European Journal of Plastic Surgery

, Volume 26, Issue 6, pp 306–311 | Cite as

Subperiosteal tissue expansion: an experimental study

  • Ibrahim AskarEmail author
  • Bizden Tavil Sabuncuoglu
  • Mustafa Rıza Ozbek
Original Article
  • 49 Downloads

Abstract

Periosteal flaps have been used to cover bone defects. There are no sufficient data on whether expanded periosteum can be used to repair bone defects after subperiosteal tissue expansion. In this experimental study, 14 male dogs, which were 2 years-old and weighed 14.5–16.0 kg, were used to investigate the repair of bony defects with expanded periosteum. Rectangular tissue expanders, measuring 50 mm in width, 70 mm in length, and 20 mm in height (volume: 20 ml) were used. The dogs were divided into two groups each of seven dogs: one control group and one experimental group. In each dog, a pocket, 50×70 mm in size, was prepared in parietal area, and a periosteal area, 30×40 mm in size, was marked out. A rectangular tissue expander was inserted into the pocket. In the control group, the tissue expanders were not inflated. On the seventh postoperative day, the tissue expander inflation with normal saline (5 ml per 2 days) was started in the experimental group. After 15 days, the previously marked out periosteal area was measured. A specimen was taken from this periosteal tissue for histopathological evaluation. A bone defect, 20×20 mm in size, was created beneath expanded periosteal tissue, and this defect was covered with the expanded periosteal tissue. After 15 days, a histopathological evaluation was carried out. Statistical analysis was carried out using the Mann–Whitney U-test. The area of periosteum expanded was more in the experimental group than that of the control group (p>0.05). After removal of the tissue expander, both in the control and subperiosteal tissue expansion group, osteoblastic lining of the expanded periosteum, increased vascularity, and granulation tissue was noted. Following 15 days, woven and lamellated bone tissue was formed both in the control and subperiosteal expansion group. In the subperiosteal expansion group, there was greater bone formation, the expanded periosteum was thickened, and thickened lamellated bone was covered by active osteoblasts. It is concluded that subperiosteal tissue expansion may be worthwhile to provide large periosteal flaps for the repair of large bone defects, by increasing osteogenic capacity.

Keywords

Periosteum Subperiosteal tissue expansion Tissue expander Bone defect 

References

  1. 1.
    Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA (1998) Bone replacement grafts. The bone substitutes. Dent Clin North Am 42:491–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argenta LC, Watanabe MJ, Grabb WC, et al. (1981) Soft tissue expanders in head and neck surgery: A new method of reconstruction. Plast Surg Forum 4:244–249Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Argenta LC, Watanabe MJ, Grabb WC (1983) The use of tissue expansion in head and neck reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 11:31–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Argenta LC (1984) Controlled tissue expansion in reconstructive surgery. Br J Plast Surg 37:520–529PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Argenta LC, Vander Kolk CA (1987) Tissue expansion in craniofacial surgery. Clin Plast Surg 14:143–153Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Block JE, Poser J (1995) Does xenogenic demineralized bone matrix have clinical utility as a bone graft substitute? Med Hypotheses 45:27–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dahlin C, Alberius P, Linde A (1991) Osteopromotion for cranioplasty. An experimental study in rats using a membrane technique. J Neurosurg 74:487–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Glowacki J, Mulliken JB (1985) Demineralized bone implants. Clin Plast Surg 12:223–241Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hemmer KM, Marsh JL, Picker S (1987) Calvarial erosion after scalp expansion. Ann Plast Surg 19:454–459PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kasai K, Ogawa Y, Takeuchi E (1991) A case of sideburn reconstruction using a temporoparieto-occipital island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 87:146–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan SN, Tomin E, Lane JM (2000) Clinical applications of bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin North Am 31:389–398PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lane JM, Sandhu HS (1987) Current approaches to experimental bone grafting. Orthop Clin North Am 18:213–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lew D, Amos EL, Shroyer JV (1988) The use of a subperiosteal tissue expander in rib reconstruction of an atrophic mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 48:229–232Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lew D, Fuseler JW (1991) The effect of stepwise expansion on the mitotic activity and vascularity of subdermal tissue and induced capsule in the rat. J Oral Surg 49:848–856Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moelleken BR, Mathes SJ, Cann CE, et al. (1990) Long-term effects of tissue expansion on cranial and skeletal bone development in neonatal miniature swine: Clinical findings and histomorphometric correlates. Plast Reconstr Surg 86:825–834PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI (2001) Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg 71:354–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moscona R, Ullmann Y, Bergman R, et al. (1989) Postirradiation extensive cicatricial alopecia treated by tissue expansion. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 15:337–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Neumann CG (1957) The expansion of an area of skin by progressive distention of a subcutaneous balloon. Plast Reconstr Surg 19:124–131Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nordstrom REA, Devine JW (1985) Scalp stretching with a tissue expander for closure of scalp defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 75:578–581PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oklund SA, Prolo DJ, Guiterez RV, et al. (1986) Quantitative comparisons of healing in cranial fresh autografts frozen autografts and processed autografts, and allografts in canine skull defects. Clin Orthop Rel Res 205:269–291Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Okubo Y, Bessho K, Fujimura K, Kusumoto K, Ogawa Y, Iizuka T (2001) Effect of hyperbaric oxygenation on bone induced by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:91–95CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Prolo DJ, Rodrigo JJ (1985) Contemporary bone graft physiology and surgery. Clin Orthop 200:322–342PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radovan C (1984) Tissue expansion in soft-tissue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 74:482–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosen PS, Reynolds MA, Bowers GM (2000) The treatment of intrabony defects with bone grafts. Periodontol 22:88–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shaw JL, Bassett CAL (1967) The effects of varying oxygen concentrations on osteogenesis and embryonic cartilage in vitro. J Bone Joint Surg 49A:73–80Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Skoog T (1967) The use of periosteum and Surgicel for bone restoration in congenital clefts of the maxilla. A clinical report and experimental investigation. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1:113–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takato T, Harii K, Nakatsuka T, et al (1986) Vascularized periosteal grafts: An experimental study using two different forms of tibial periosteum in rabbits. Plast Reconstr Surg 78:489–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Timmenga EJ, Andreassen TT, Houthoff HJ, et al (1991) The effect of mechanical stress on healing skin wounds: an experimental study in rabbits using tissue expansion. Br J Plast Surg 44:514–519Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tominaga K, Matsuo T, Kuga Y, et al (1993) An animal model for subperiosteal tissue expansion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:1244–1249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tominaga K, Matsuo T, Kuga Y, et al (1994) Subperiosteal tissue expansion for mandibular augmentation with hydroxyapatite particles: An experimental study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 52:945–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Van Damme PA, Heidbüchel KL, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, et al. (1992) Craniomaxillofacial tissue expansion, experimentally based or clinically empiric? A review of literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 20:61–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Van Damme PA, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, et al (1997) Two-dimensional cephalometric analysis of the effects of subperiosteal palatal soft-tissue expansion in growing cats. Plast Reconstr Surg 99:1960–1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Vlassis JM, Wetzel A, Caffesse RG (1999) Controlled subperiosteal tissue expansion to facilitate GBR for the placement of endosseous dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 19:289–297PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ibrahim Askar
    • 1
    Email author
  • Bizden Tavil Sabuncuoglu
    • 2
  • Mustafa Rıza Ozbek
    • 3
  1. 1.Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryDicle University Medical SchoolDiyarbakirTurkey
  2. 2.Histology and EmbryologyAnkara University Medical SchoolAnkaraTurkey
  3. 3.Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeryAnkara University Medical SchoolAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations