Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A body mass index related scale for reconstructive breast reduction

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Breast reduction is a highly emotional topic, involving three conflicting interests: (a) women suffering from symptomatic macromastia, (b) health insurance companies, and (c) surgeons. Many insurance companies, including those in Austria, cover (if at all) only breast reductions with a minimum resection weight of 500 g per breast, irrespective of the physical build of the woman involved. We retrospectively reviewed 136 patients' charts from both cosmetic and reconstructive breast reduction operations and compared the breast resection weight to various parameters of body proportions such as height, weight, body mass index (BMI), and body surface area to determine the parameter best correlated to the weight of breast tissue resected. From this we developed a graded scale for guiding future operations irrespective of a woman's body build. The resection weight ranged from 55 to 1530 g (mean 450±266, median 406); mean BMI was 25.1. The arbitrary 500 g breast resection rule discriminates against women of nonaverage weight or height: of 24 patients (18%) with a cosmetic indication 4 had more than 500 g breast tissue resected bilaterally, while in 62 reconstructive patients (46%) less than the arbitrary 500 g breast tissue was resected. The parameter best correlated to the mean weight of breast tissue resected (sum of both breasts) was BMI. We therefore suggest using the BMI as the basis for a graded weight resection guideline for reconstructive breast reductions. The BMI-based scale treats equally women of all types of body build. In women with a BMI greater than 30 (classified as adiposity) we recommend that breast reduction be postponed, and a general body weight reduction program be undertaken for the sake of a higher impact on general well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beer GM, Morgenthaler W, Spicher I, Meyer VE (2001) Modifications in vertical scar breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg 54:341–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boschert MT, Barone CM, Puckett CL (1996) Outcome analysis of reduction mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 98:451–454

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coakley EH, Kawachi I, Manson JE, Speizer FE, Willet WC, Colditz GA (1998) Lower levels of physical functioning are associated with higher body weight among middle-aged and older women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 122:958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dabbah A, Lehman JA, Parker MG, Tantri D, Wagner D (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: an outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg 35:337–341

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Damush TM, Stump TE, Clark DO (2002) Body-mass index and 4-year change in health-related quality of life. J Aging Health 14:195–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis GM, Ringler SL, Short K, Sherrik D, Bengtson BP (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: long term efficacy, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg 96:1106–1110

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. DeWaard F (1978) Body mass index. J Chronic Dis 31:129

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferreira MC (2000) Evaluation of results in aesthetic plastic surgery: preliminary observations on mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1630–1638

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gonzalez F, Walton RL, Shafer B, Matory WE, Borah GL (1993) Reduction mammaplasty improves symptoms of macromastia. Plast Reconstr Surg 91:1270–1275

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Striplin D, Kim HM, Wilkins E, Cunningham B, Lowery J (2001) The health burden of breast hypertrophy. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:1591–1599

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerrigan CL, Collins ED, Kim HM, Schnur PL, Wilkins E, Cunninhgam B, Lower J (2002) Reduction mammaplasty: defining medical necessity. Med Decis Making 22:208–217

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Klassen A, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C, Goodacre T (1996) Should breast reduction surgery be rationed? A comparison of the health status of patients before and after treatment: postal questionnaire survey. BMJ 313:454–457

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lettermann G, Schurter M (1980) The effects of mammary hypertrophy on the skeletal system. Ann Plast Surg 5:425–431

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller AP, Zacher JB, Berggren RB, Falcone RE, Monk J (1995) Breast reduction for symptomatic macromastia: can objective predictors for operative success be identified? Plast Reconstr Surg 95:77–83

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roucher R, Drevet JG, Auberge T (1990) Reduction mammaire et abdominoplastie: effet preventif et therapeutique sur la douleur rechidienne chez la famme. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 35:228–232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schnur PL, Hoehn JG, Ilstrup DM, Cahoy MJ, Chu C-P (1991) Reduction mammaplasty: cosmetic or reconstructive procedure? Ann Plast Surg 27:232–237

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schnur PL (1999) Reduction mammaplasty—the Schnur sliding scale revisited. Ann Plast Surg 42:107–108

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seitchik MW (1995) Reduction mammaplasty: criteria for insurance coverage. Plast Reconstr Surg 95:1029–1032

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Strombeck JO (1964) Macromastia in women and its surgical treatment. Acta Chir Scand Suppl 3431:1–16

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gertrude M. Beer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kompatscher, P., von Planta, A., Seifert, B. et al. A body mass index related scale for reconstructive breast reduction. Eur J Plast Surg 26, 202–206 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0506-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0506-9

Keywords

Navigation