Skip to main content
Log in

The selection of the most appropriate materials and the timing of procedures for dura, bone, and skin reconstruction in patients with wartime head injuries

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Journal of Plastic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the 5-year war in former Yugoslavia 294 patients were surgically treated for head injuries at the Neurosurgical Department of the Emergency Center, Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade. In addition to other problems related to direct trauma of brain tissue, some specific problems related to other tissue defects and their importance in further complications which changed the final outcome have been noted. This study analyzed methods and materials used for dura, bone, and skin reconstruction in a search for better management of this problem. We conclude that for dural reconstruction in these patients the best materials are autologous (autotransplantation of periosteum, galea aponeurotica, or fascia lata) since this results in fewer complications and better results. Local skin flaps were used for small skin defects, but more extensive skin defects required larger flaps with free skin grafting of secondary defects. Both dura and skin reconstruction should be performed as soon as possible to prevent infection and other complications, but delayed surgery is recommended for bone defects. Only bone defects with diameter over 3–4 cm were treated surgically (alloplastic material, Palacos, being used) after 6–12 months in cases with no signs of infection. This strategy yielded the best results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aarabi B (1990) Surgical outcome in 435 patients who sustained missile head wounds during Iran-Iraq war. Neurosurgery 27:692–695

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumer F, Golling M, Taruttis H (1992) Gunshot injuries-their incidence and surgical problems. Aktuelle Traumatol 22:96–101

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Benzel EC, Day WT, Kesterson L, Willis BK, Kessler CW, Modling B, Hadeu TA (1991) Civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. Neurosurgery 29:67–72

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brandvold B, Levi L, Peinsod M, George ED (1990) Penetrating craniocerebral injuries in the Israeli involvement in the Lebanese conflict 1982–1985. Analyses of the less aggressive surgical approach. J Neurosurg 72:15–21

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Carey ME, Sarna GS, Farrell JB, Happel LT (1989) Experimental missile wound to the brain. J Neurosurg 71:754–764

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chauhdri KA, Choudhury AR, al-Moutaery KR, Cybulsky GR (1994) Penetrating craniocerebral shrapnel injuries during Operation Desert Storm: early results of conservative surgical treatment. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 126–:120–123

  7. Clark WC, Mühlbauer MS, Watridge CB, Ray MW (1986) Analyses of 76 civilian craniocerebral gunshot wounds. J Neurosurg 65:9–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cushing H (1918) A study of a series of wounds involving the brain and its enveloping structures. Br J Surg 5:558–684

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grahm TW, Williams FC Jr, Harrington T, Spetzler RF (1990) Civilian gunshot wounds to the head. A prospective study. Neurosurgery 27:696–700

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hammon WM (1971) Analyses of 2187 consecutive penetrating wounds of the brain from Vietnam. J Neurosurg 34:127–131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jefferson G (1919) The physiological pathology of gunshot wounds of the head. Br J Surg 7:262–289

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaufman HH (1993) Civilian gunshot wounds to the head. Neurosurgery 32:962–964

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Khilkov VA, Usanov EI, Umerov EKH, Barchukov VG, Bolotov AA, Belozrov VV (1994) The prediction of cranioplasty outcomes after gunshot wounds of the skull and brain. Voen Med Zh 2:32–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Piorrowski WP (1992) Results of treatment of brain gunshot injuries. Unfallchirurg 95:74–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA (1994) Neurosurgical recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery 34:729–731

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shul MR, Glawe H, Siedschlag WD, Nisch G, Winkelmann H (1992) Conservative or surgical treatment for foreign body injuries of the brain. Zentralbl Neurochir 53:69–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stone JL, Lictor T, Fitzgerald LF (1995) Gunshot wounds to the head in civilian practice. Neurosurgery 37:1104–1112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. B. Vujotic.

Additional information

An invited commentary to this paper is available at: http://dx.doi.org./10.1007/s00238-003-0492-y

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vujotic, L.B., Jovanovic, M.J. & Colic, M.M. The selection of the most appropriate materials and the timing of procedures for dura, bone, and skin reconstruction in patients with wartime head injuries. Eur J Plast Surg 26, 181–184 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0491-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-003-0491-z

Keywords

Navigation