Skip to main content
Log in

Paramaxillary CT-guided fine needle aspiration of head and neck lesions: technique, diagnostic yield, and safety profile

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Computed tomography (CT)-guided percutaneous biopsy of deep-seated head and neck lesions can be a less invasive and equally effective alternative to surgical techniques. There are multiple approaches for needle biopsy that target varying spaces within the head and neck while successfully avoiding critical anatomy. In the paramaxillary approach, the needle is advanced through the infrazygomatic buccal space, in between the maxilla and mandible. In this study, we examine the safety and diagnostic yield of FNA without core needle biopsy performed via the paramaxillary approach in 19 patients yielding 20 fine needle aspirates between 2014 and 2022. Of the fine needle aspirates, 85.0% (17/20) were diagnostic. Concordant histopathologic diagnosis was obtained in 100% (17/17) diagnostic fine needle aspirates. There were no postprocedural complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pynnonen MA, Gillespie MB, Roman B et al (2017) Clinical practice guideline: evaluation of the neck mass in adults. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 157(2_suppl):S1–S30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Layfield LJ (1996) Fine-needle aspiration of the head and neck. Pathology (Phila) 4(2):409–438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sherman PM, Yousem DM, Loevner LA (2004) CT-guided aspirations in the head and neck: assessment of the first 216 cases. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1603–1607

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. DelGaudio JM, Dillard DG, Albritton FD, Hudgins P, Wallace VC, Lewis MM (2000) Computed tomography–guided needle biopsy of head and neck lesions. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126:366–370

  5. Gupta S, Henningsen JA, Wallace MJ et al (2007) Percutaneous biopsy of head and neck lesions with CT guidance: various approaches and relevant anatomic and technical considerations. Radiographics 27(2):371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Abemayor E, Ljung BM, Ward PH, Larsson S, Hanafee W (1985) CT-directed fine needle aspiration biopsies of masses in the head and neck. Laryngoscope 95:1382–1386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McKnight CD, Glastonbury CM, Ibrahim M, Rivas-Rodriguez F, Srinivasan A (2017) Techniques and approaches for safe, high-yield CT-guided suprahyoid head and neck biopsies. AJR Am J Roentgenol 208(1):76–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sack MJ, Weber RS, Weinstein GS, Chalian AA, Nisenbaum HL, Yousem DM (1998) Image-guided fine-needle aspiration of the head and neck: five years’ experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124(10):1155–1161

  9. Brennan PA, Mackenzie N, Oeppen RS, Kulamarva G, Thomas GJ, Spedding AV (2007) Prospective randomized clinical trial of the effect of needle size on pain, sample adequacy and accuracy in head and neck fine-needle aspiration cytology. Head Neck 29(10):919–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daiqi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Weill Cornell Medicine (protocol 9–08020630).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants within the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no other funding, financial relationships, or conflict of interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, D., Chazen, J.L., Kutler, D.I. et al. Paramaxillary CT-guided fine needle aspiration of head and neck lesions: technique, diagnostic yield, and safety profile. Neuroradiology 64, 2207–2211 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03037-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-03037-1

Navigation