Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT angiography for diagnosis of carotid near-occlusion: a digital subtraction angiography validation study

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Carotid near-occlusion (CNO) is a variant of severe stenosis where there is a distal luminal collapse of the internal carotid artery (ICA) beyond a tight stenosis. This study aimed to validate new visual extracranial diagnostic CT angiography (CTA) criteria, for the diagnosis of CNO. The new criteria include distal ICA diameter smaller than contralateral ICA and distal ICA diameter less than or equal to the ipsilateral external carotid artery (ECA). We also assessed the previously described CTA criteria: stenosis ≤ 1.3 mm, ipsilateral distal ICA ≤ 3.5 mm, ipsilateral distal ICA/contralateral distal ICA ratio ≤ 0.87, ipsilateral distal ICA/ipsilateral ECA ≤ 1.27.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients with ICA stenosis (including the near-occlusion variant) or occlusion on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were included. These patients had DSA and CTA studies completed within 30 days of each other. DSA was considered the reference test. Two neuroradiologists blinded to the DSA results assessed the CTA images and evaluated the new and previously published CNO diagnostic criteria.

Results

Twenty-eight CNO were identified with DSA. The “distal ICA diameter less than or equal to the ipsilateral ECA” criterion had 79% sensitivity and 83% specificity with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.80), while three or more of the previously published criteria reached 82% sensitivity and 90% specificity, with a good interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.64).

Conclusions

CT angiography may be useful for CNO diagnosis. The new visual diagnostic criteria provide acceptable results of sensitivity and specificity with an excellent interobserver agreement. However, false-negative and positive results persist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CNO:

Carotid near-occlusion

ICA:

Internal carotid artery

ECA:

External carotid artery

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

CTA:

Computed tomography angiography

References

  1. Johansson E, Fox A (2016) Carotid near-occlusion: a comprehensive review, Part 1— Definition, Terminology, and Diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:2–10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fox AJ, Eliasziw M, Rothwell PM, Schmidt MH, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM (2005) Identification, prognosis, and management of patients with carotid artery near occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2086–2094

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Johansson E, Gu T, Aviv RI, Fox AJ (2020) Carotid near-occlusion is often overlooked when CT angiography is assessed in routine practice. Eur Radiol 30(5):2543–2551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonati LH, Kakkos S, Berkefeld J, de Borst GJ, Bulbulia R, Halliday A et al (2021) European Stroke Organisation guideline on endarterectomy and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Eur Stroke J 6(2):I–XLVII

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Writing Group, Naylor AR, Ricco JB, de Borst GJ, Debus S, de Haro J et al (2018) Management of atherosclerotic carotid and vertebral artery disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 55:3–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons PSFA (2006) Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusion by using CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:632–637

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Palacios-Mendoza MA, García-Pastor A, Gil-Núñez A, Ramírez-Moreno JM, González-Nafría N, Tejada J et al (2021) Ultrasonographic and hemodynamic characteristics of patients with symptomatic carotid near-occlusion : results from a multicenter registry study. Neuroradiology 63:705–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johansson E, Vanoli D, Bråten-Johansson I, Law L, Aviv RI, Fox AJ (2021) Near-occlusion is difficult to diagnose with common carotid ultrasound methods. Neuroradiology 63(5):721–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Khangure SR, Benhabib H, Machnowska M, Fox AJ, Grönlund C, Herod W et al (2018) Carotid near-occlusion frequently has high peak systolic velocity on Doppler ultrasound. Neuroradiology 60(1):17–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gu T, Aviv RI, Fox AJ, Johansson E (2020) Symptomatic carotid near-occlusion causes a high risk of recurrent ipsilateral ischemic stroke. J Neurol 267:522–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johansson E, Aviv RI, Fox AJ (2020) Atherosclerotic ICA stenosis coinciding with ICA asymmetry associated with Circle of Willis variations can mimic near-occlusion 101–4.

  12. Chen CJ, Lee TH, Hsu HL, Tseng YC, Lin SK, Wang LJ et al (2004) Multi-slice CT angiography in diagnosing total versus near occlusions of the internal carotid artery: comparison with catheter angiography. Stroke 35(1):83–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koskinen SM, Silvennoinen H, Ijäs P, Nuotio K, Valanne L, Lindsberg PJ et al (2017) Recognizing subtle near-occlusion in carotid stenosis patients: a computed tomography angiographic study. Neuroradiology 59:353–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Johansson E, Fox A (2017) Diagnosing carotid near-occlusion with 1 mm side-to-side asymmetry: a tough task made too easy. Neuroradiology 59:319–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Johansson E, Zarrinkoob L, Wåhlin A (2021) Diagnosing carotid near-occlusion with phase-contrast MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1–3.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Pedro José Borrego Ruiz for helping with acquisition and procesing of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martiel Manrique-Zegarra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Gregorio Marañón University Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The abstract was presented as an e-poster in the ESOC meeting 2021.

All the authors were part of the multidisclipinary team of the stroke center Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 287 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manrique-Zegarra, M., García-Pastor, A., Castro-Reyes, E. et al. CT angiography for diagnosis of carotid near-occlusion: a digital subtraction angiography validation study. Neuroradiology 64, 1729–1735 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-02995-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-022-02995-w

Keywords

Navigation