Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical impact of EVT with failed reperfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke: results from the ESCAPE and ESCAPE-NA1 trials

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Endovascular treatment (EVT) is a powerful treatment for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke if reperfusion can be achieved, while in cases with failed reperfusion, EVT may cause harm, as procedure-related complications may occur. We hypothesized that EVT with failed recanalization does not result in worse outcomes compared to best medical management and compared clinical outcomes of LVO stroke patients who underwent EVT with failed reperfusion to those who were treated with best medical management.

Methods

We included patients with failed reperfusion from the control (EVT-only) arm of the ESCAPE-NA1 trial and the EVT arm of the ESCAPE trial and patients of the ESCAPE control arm who were treated with best medical management. Failed reperfusion following EVT was defined as modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score 0–2a. Proportions of good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0–2) were compared between patients who did and did not undergo EVT, and adjusted effect size estimates for EVT on outcomes were obtained.

Results

We included 260 patients (110 failed EVT and 150 non-EVT patients). Proportions of good outcome were 38/110 (34.6%) with failed EVT vs.43/147 (29.3%) without EVT (adjusted odds ratio[aOR]: 1.48 [95%CI: 0.81–2.68]). Mortality and proportions of sICH in the failed EVT group vs. patients treated with best medical management were 26/110 (23.6%) vs. 28/147 (19.1%), aOR: 1.12 (95%CI: 0.56–2.24), and 7/110 (6.4%) vs. 4/150 (2.7%), aOR: 2.34 (95%CI: 0.00–22.97).

Conclusion

Clinical outcomes of EVT patients with failed reperfusion did not differ significantly from patients treated with best medical management

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Davalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millan M, Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Roman LS, Ribo M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin TG, collaborators H, (2016) Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet 387(10029):1723–1731. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Flottmann F, Broocks G, Faizy TD, McDonough R, Watermann L, Deb-Chatterji M, Thomalla G, Herzberg M, Nolte CH, Fiehler J, Leischner H, Brekenfeld C, investigators GSR, (2020) Factors associated with failure of reperfusion in endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke : a multicenter analysis. Clin Neuroradiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-020-00880-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaesmacher J, Gralla J, Mosimann PJ, Zibold F, Heldner MR, Piechowiak E, Dobrocky T, Arnold M, Fischer U, Mordasini P (2018) Reasons for reperfusion failures in stent-retriever-based thrombectomy: registry analysis and proposal of a classification system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39(10):1848–1853. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Leischner H, Flottmann F, Hanning U, Broocks G, Faizy TD, Deb-Chatterji M, Bernhardt M, Brekenfeld C, Buhk JH, Gellissen S, Thomalla G, Gerloff C, Fiehler J (2019) Reasons for failed endovascular recanalization attempts in stroke patients. J Neurointerv Surg 11(5):439–442. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Behme D, Gondecki L, Fiethen S, Kowoll A, Mpotsaris A, Weber W (2014) Complications of mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke-a retrospective single-center study of 176 consecutive cases. Neuroradiology 56(6):467–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1352-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah VA, Martin CO, Hawkins AM, Holloway WE, Junna S, Akhtar N (2016) Groin complications in endovascular mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: a 10-year single center experience. J Neurointerv Surg 8(6):568–570. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rizvi A, Seyedsaadat SM, Murad MH, Brinjikji W, Fitzgerald ST, Kadirvel R, Rabinstein AA, Kallmes DF (2019) Redefining “success”: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between incomplete and complete revascularization. J Neurointerv Surg 11(1):9–13. https://doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, Eesa M, Rempel JL, Thornton J, Roy D, Jovin TG, Willinsky RA, Sapkota BL, Dowlatshahi D, Frei DF, Kamal NR, Montanera WJ, Poppe AY, Ryckborst KJ, Silver FL, Shuaib A, Tampieri D, Williams D, Bang OY, Baxter BW, Burns PA, Choe H, Heo JH, Holmstedt CA, Jankowitz B, Kelly M, Linares G, Mandzia JL, Shankar J, Sohn SI, Swartz RH, Barber PA, Coutts SB, Smith EE, Morrish WF, Weill A, Subramaniam S, Mitha AP, Wong JH, Lowerison MW, Sajobi TT, Hill MD, Investigators ET (2015) Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 372(11):1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414905

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hill MD, Goyal M, Menon BK, Nogueira RG, McTaggart RA, Demchuk AM, Poppe AY, Buck BH, Field TS, Dowlatshahi D, van Adel BA, Swartz RH, Shah RA, Sauvageau E, Zerna C, Ospel JM, Joshi M, Almekhlafi MA, Ryckborst KJ, Lowerison MW, Heard K, Garman D, Haussen D, Cutting SM, Coutts SB, Roy D, Rempel JL, Rohr AC, Iancu D, Sahlas DJ, Yu AYX, Devlin TG, Hanel RA, Puetz V, Silver FL, Campbell BCV, Chapot R, Teitelbaum J, Mandzia JL, Kleinig TJ, Turkel-Parrella D, Heck D, Kelly ME, Bharatha A, Bang OY, Jadhav A, Gupta R, Frei DF, Tarpley JW, McDougall CG, Holmin S, Rha JH, Puri AS, Camden MC, Thomalla G, Choe H, Phillips SJ, Schindler JL, Thornton J, Nagel S, Heo JH, Sohn SI, Psychogios MN, Budzik RF, Starkman S, Martin CO, Burns PA, Murphy S, Lopez GA, English J, Tymianski M, Investigators E-N (2020) Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 395(10227):878–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30258-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P, Tomsick TA, von Kummer R, Saver JL, Marks MP, Prabhakaran S, Kallmes DF, Fitzsimmons BF, Mocco J, Wardlaw JM, Barnwell SL, Jovin TG, Linfante I, Siddiqui AH, Alexander MJ, Hirsch JA, Wintermark M, Albers G, Woo HH, Heck DV, Lev M, Aviv R, Hacke W, Warach S, Broderick J, Derdeyn CP, Furlan A, Nogueira RG, Yavagal DR, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Bendszus M, Liebeskind DS, Cerebral angiographic revascularization grading c, group SRw, Force STiCIT, (2013) Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 44(9):2650–2663. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001972

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. von Kummer R, Broderick JP, Campbell BC, Demchuk A, Goyal M, Hill MD, Treurniet KM, Majoie CB, Marquering HA, Mazya MV, San Roman L, Saver JL, Strbian D, Whiteley W, Hacke W (2015) The Heidelberg bleeding classification: classification of bleeding events after ischemic stroke and reperfusion therapy. Stroke 46(10):2981–2986. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.010049

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the ESCAPE and ESCAPE-NA1 investigators.

Funding

ESCAPE: Grants to the University of Calgary from Covidien, Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and Alberta Health Services. ESCAPE-NA1: NoNO Inc., Alberta Innovates–Health Solutions, Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mayank Goyal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

BM: patent (stroke triage systems), stock ownership(Circle Neurovascular). MG: consultant (Medtronic, Stryker, Microvention, GE Healthcare, Mentice). MDH: grants (CIHR, Medtronic, NoNo Inc.) outside the submitted work, patent(US Patent office Number: 62/086,077), Boards: Circle Neurovascular, Canadian Neuroscience Federation, Canadian Stroke Consortium. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the local ethics board of all participating sites.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrolment.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1170 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ospel, J.M., Hill, M.D., Demchuk, A. et al. Clinical impact of EVT with failed reperfusion in patients with acute ischemic stroke: results from the ESCAPE and ESCAPE-NA1 trials. Neuroradiology 63, 1883–1889 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02723-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02723-w

Keywords

Navigation