Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Intra-aneurysmal embolization of cellulose porous beads to regenerate vessel wall: an experimental study

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although the treatment of intracranial cerebral aneurysms with detachable coils is now widely accepted, the problem of coil compaction and recanalization remains unsolved. If the vessel wall can be regenerated at the neck orifice of an aneurysm, thereby reducing the blood flow into the aneurysm, the recurrence rate of the aneurysm would decrease. Accordingly, we aimed to insert cellulose porous beads (CPBs) into rat models of external carotid artery (ECA) aneurysm and study their efficacy in promoting vessel wall regeneration.

Methods

Using a rat aneurysm model, we examined the tissue response to CPBs that were inserted into the ligated ECA sac of rats. The sacs were removed on days 14, 42, 84, and 180 after insertion and subjected to conventional and immunohistochemical examination. We evaluated the tissue response in the ECA sacs and observed the vessel wall regeneration progress.

Results

At the neck orifice of the aneurysm in which the CPB was inserted, a layer of regenerating α-smooth muscle actin-positive spindle cells was observed on day 14. The regenerative cell layer gradually thickened until day 42 and, thereafter, the thickness remained unchanged until day 180. A monolayer of factor VIII-positive cells also appeared at the neck orifice on day 14 and covered the entire orifice until day 180. The CPBs were stably localized in the sac without degradation or signs of inflammation.

Conclusion

CPBs may be promising as embolic materials that can induce stable vessel wall regeneration at the neck orifice of an aneurysm without surrounding inflammatory reactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallas S, Pasco A, Cottier JP, Gabrillargues J, Drouineau J, Cognard C, Herbreteau D (2005) A multicenter study of 705 ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1723–1731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J et al (2002) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P, International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group (2005) International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, Georganos SA, Juravsky L, Lambert A et al (2003) Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 34:1398–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sluzewski M, van Rooij WJ, Beute GN, Nijssen PC (2005) Late rebleeding of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2542–2549

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Rooij WJ, Sprengers ME, Sluzewski M, Beute GN (2007) Intracranial aneurysms that repeatedly reopen over time after coiling: imaging characteristics and treatment outcome. Neuroradiology 49:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Johnston SC, Dowd CF, Higashida RT, Lawton MT, Duckwiler GR, Gress DR (2008) Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 39:120–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwai S, Sawa Y, Taketani S, Torikai K, Hirakawa K, Matsuda H (2005) Novel tissue-engineered biodegradable material for reconstruction of vascular wall. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1821–1827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yokota T, Ichikawa H, Matsumiya G, Kuratani T, Sakaguchi T, Iwai S, Shirakawa Y, Torikai K, Saito A, Uchimura E, Kawaguchi N, Matsuura N, Sawa Y (2008) In situ tissue regeneration using a novel tissue-engineered, small-caliber vascular graft without cell seeding. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:900–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamada J, Ushio Y, Kazekawa K, Tsukahara T, Hashimoto N, Iwata H (1996) Embolization with cellulose porous beads, i: an experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1895–1899

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamada J, Kai Y, Nagahiro S, Hashimoto N, Iwata H, Ushio Y (1996) Embolization with cellulose porous beads, ii: clinical trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1901–1906

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohyama T, Nishide T, Iwata H, Sato H, Toda M, Taki W (2004) Vascular endothelial growth factor immobilized on platinum microcoils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: experimental rat model study. Neuro Med Chir (Tokyo) 44:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohyama T, Nishide T, Iwata H, Sato H, Toda M, Toma N, Taki W (2005) Immobilization of basic fibroblast growth factor on a platinum microcoil to enhance tissue organization in intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 102:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sano H, Toda M, Sugihara T, Uchiyama N, Hamada J, Iwata H (2010) Coils coated with the cyclic peptide SEK-1005 accelerate intra-aneurysmal organization. Neurosurgery 67:984–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kodama T, Iwata H (2013) Comparison of bare metal and statin-coated coils on rates of intra-aneurysmal tissue organization in a rat model of aneurysm. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:656–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tamatani S, Ozawa T, Minakawa T, Takeuchi S, Koike T, Tanaka R (1997) Histological interaction of cultured endothelial cells and endovascular embolic materials coated with extracellular matrix. J Neurosurg 86:109–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dawson RC 3rd, Shengelaia GG, Krisht AF, Bonner GD (1996) Histologic effects of collagen-filled interlocking detachable coils in the ablation of experimental aneurysms in swine. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:853–858

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Szikora I, Wakhloo AK, Guterman LR, Chavis TD, Dawson RC 3rd, Hergenrother RW et al (1997) Initial experience with collagen-filled Guglielmi detachable coils for endovascular treatment of experimental aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:667–672

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murayama Y, Tateshima S, Gonzalez NR, Vinuela F (2003) Matrix and bioabsorbable polymeric coils accelerate healing of intracranial aneurysms: long-term experimental study. Stroke 34:2031–2037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Anderson RL, Owens JW, Timms CW (1992) The toxicity of purified cellulose in studies with laboratory animals. Cancer Lett 63:83–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cullen RT, Searl A, Miller BG, Davis JM, Jones AD (2000) Pulmonary and intraperitoneal inflammation induced by cellulose fibres. J Appl Toxicol 20:49–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Asahara T (1997) Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science 275:964–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwami Y, Masuda H, Asahara T (2004) Endothelial progenitor cells: past, state of the art, and future. J Cell Mol Med 8:488–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hristov M, Weber C (2004) Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization, pathophysiology, and possible clinical relevance. J Cell Mol Med 8:498–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Akiko Imamura for aiding with immunohistochemistry. We thank Jun-ichi Shirokaze, Asahi Chemical Industry, for the invaluable help in performing the experiments.

Funding

This study was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (Multi-year Fund) Grant Number 15K10295 to N.U.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naoyuki Uchiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the policies set by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute for Frontier Medical Sciences of Kanazawa University.

Informed consent

NA

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hasegawa, T., Uchiyama, N., Sano, H. et al. Intra-aneurysmal embolization of cellulose porous beads to regenerate vessel wall: an experimental study. Neuroradiology 62, 1169–1175 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02440-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02440-w

Keywords

Navigation