Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety of CT-guided cervical nerve root infiltrations using a dorsal approach

  • Short Report
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cervical nerve root infiltrations are frequently performed in patients with radiculopathy, and computed tomography (CT) is commonly used for image guidance. With the traditional anterolateral approach, catastrophic side events due to spinal ischemia have been reported. To minimize risk, a dorsal approach has been advised, but the safety of this dorsal approach has not been studied systematically. In a 5-year period, 137 cervical nerve root infiltrations using a dorsal approach were performed on 109 patients and retrospectively reviewed. In our series, no major complications like spinal ischemia, spondylodiscitis, large hematomas with the need for surgery or severe allergic reactions occurred. In conclusion, using a dorsal approach, CT-guided cervical nerve root infiltrations with an extraforaminal needle position seem to be a safe intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brunner P, Amoretti SF et al (2012) Approaches in injections for radicular pain: the transforaminal, epidural and transfacet approaches. Diagn Interv Imaging 93:711–722

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Windsor RE, Storm S, Sugar R, Nagula D (2003) Cervical transforaminal injection: review of the literature, complications, and a suggested technique. Pain Physician 6:457–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Contreras R, Ortega-Romero A (2013) Ultrasound- guided interventional procedures for cervical pain. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag 17:64–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hodler J, Boos N, Schubert M (2013) Must we discontinue selective cervical nerve root block? Report of two cases and review of the literature. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl):466–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolter T, Knoeller S, Berlis A, Hader C (2010) CT-guided cervical selective nerve root block with a dorsal approach. AJNR 31:1831–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sutter R, Pfirrmann CWA, Zanetti M et al (2011) CT-guided cervical nerve root injections: comparing the immediate post-injection anesthetic-related effects of the transforaminal injection with a new indirect technique. Skelet Radiol 40:1603–1608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bensler S, Sutter R, Pfirrmann CW, Peterson CK (2015) Long term outcomes from CT-guided indirect cervical nerve root blocks and their relationship to the MRI- findings- a prospective study. Eur Radiol 25:3405–3413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Moon J, Kwon H (2017) Spinal cord infarction after cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection: case report and literature review. Case Rep Neurol 9:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okubadejo GO, Talcott MR, Schmidt RE, Sharma A, Patel AA, Mackey RB, Guarino AH, Moran CJ, Riew KD (2008) Perils of intravascular methylprednisolone injection into the vertebral artery: an animal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1932–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Derby R, Lee SH, Date ES, Lee JH, Lee CH (2008) Size and aggregation of corticosteroids used for epidural injections. Pain Med 9:227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Gossner.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee (affiliated University of Göttingen) and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gossner, J. Safety of CT-guided cervical nerve root infiltrations using a dorsal approach. Neuroradiology 62, 1185–1187 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02426-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-020-02426-8

Keywords

Navigation