Skip to main content

Rescue stenting versus medical care alone in refractory large vessel occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) failure is associated with very poor prognosis. Permanent intracranial stenting (PIS) may be useful in such refractory occlusions. However, this strategy requires an aggressive antithrombotic regimen that may be harmful in extended strokes. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients with refractory acute large vessel occlusions (LVOs) treated by PIS versus patients for whom the procedure was stopped without recanalization.


We conducted a systematic review by searching for articles in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and from January 2015 to September 2019. Two reviewers independently selected studies comparing PIS after failed MT in addition to usual care versus usual care only. A comparative meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models to estimate odds ratios of favorable clinical outcome at 90 days, defined as a modified Rankin scale 0–2, mortality and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH).


Four comparative studies were included for a total of 352 patients: 149 in the PIS group versus 203 in the control group. PIS was associated with significantly higher rates of 90-day favorable clinical outcome (odds ratio [OR], 2.87 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.77–4.66]; p < 0.001; I2, 0%) and lower mortality (OR, 0.39 [0.16–0.93]; p = 0.03; I2, 43%), whereas SICH rates did not significantly differ (OR, 0.68 [0.37–1.27]; p = 0.23; I2, 0%).


From observational study results, attempting PIS after failed MT seems to improve clinical outcomes without increasing the risk of intracranial bleeding. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH et al (2016) Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet Lond Engl 387:1723–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Powers WJ, Rabinstein AA, Ackerson T, Adeoye OM, Bambakidis NC, Becker K, Biller J, Brown M, Demaerschalk BM, Hoh B, Jauch EC, Kidwell CS, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Ovbiagele B, Scott PA, Sheth KN, Southerland AM, Summers DV, Tirschwell DL, American Heart Association Stroke Council (2018) 2018 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 49:e46–e110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albers GW, Marks MP, Kemp S, Christensen S, Tsai JP, Ortega-Gutierrez S, McTaggart R, Torbey MT, Kim-Tenser M, Leslie-Mazwi T, Sarraj A, Kasner SE, Ansari SA, Yeatts SD, Hamilton S, Mlynash M, Heit JJ, Zaharchuk G, Kim S, Carrozzella J, Palesch YY, Demchuk AM, Bammer R, Lavori PW, Broderick JP, Lansberg MG, DEFUSE 3 Investigators (2018) Thrombectomy for stroke at 6 to 16 hours with selection by perfusion imaging. N Engl J Med 378:708–718.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, Bonafe A, Budzik RF, Bhuva P, Yavagal DR, Ribo M, Cognard C, Hanel RA, Sila CA, Hassan AE, Millan M, Levy EI, Mitchell P, Chen M, English JD, Shah QA, Silver FL, Pereira VM, Mehta BP, Baxter BW, Abraham MG, Cardona P, Veznedaroglu E, Hellinger FR, Feng L, Kirmani JF, Lopes DK, Jankowitz BT, Frankel MR, Costalat V, Vora NA, Yoo AJ, Malik AM, Furlan AJ, Rubiera M, Aghaebrahim A, Olivot JM, Tekle WG, Shields R, Graves T, Lewis RJ, Smith WS, Liebeskind DS, Saver JL, Jovin TG, DAWN Trial Investigators (2018) Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med 378:11–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Marnat G, Saleme S, Costalat V, Bracard S, Desal H, Mazighi M, Consoli A, Piotin M, ASTER Trial Investigators (2017) Effect of endovascular contact aspiration vs stent retriever on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion: the ASTER randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318:443–452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaidat OO, Yoo AJ, Khatri P, Tomsick TA, von Kummer R, Saver JL, Marks MP, Prabhakaran S, Kallmes DF, Fitzsimmons BF, Mocco J, Wardlaw JM, Barnwell SL, Jovin TG, Linfante I, Siddiqui AH, Alexander MJ, Hirsch JA, Wintermark M, Albers G, Woo HH, Heck DV, Lev M, Aviv R, Hacke W, Warach S, Broderick J, Derdeyn CP, Furlan A, Nogueira RG, Yavagal DR, Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Bendszus M, Liebeskind DS, Cerebral Angiographic Revascularization Grading (CARG) Collaborators, STIR Revascularization working group, STIR Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) Task Force (2013) Recommendations on angiographic revascularization grading standards for acute ischemic stroke: a consensus statement. Stroke 44:2650–2663.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim GE, Yoon W, Kim SK et al (2016) Incidence and clinical significance of acute Reocclusion after emergent angioplasty or stenting for underlying intracranial stenosis in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 37:1690–1695.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaesmacher J, Gralla J, Mosimann PJ, Zibold F, Heldner MR, Piechowiak E, Dobrocky T, Arnold M, Fischer U, Mordasini P (2018) Reasons for reperfusion failures in stent-retriever-based thrombectomy: registry analysis and proposal of a classification system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:1848–1853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hashimoto T, Hayakawa M, Funatsu N, Yamagami H, Satow T, Takahashi JC, Nagatsuka K, Ishibashi-Ueda H, Kira JI, Toyoda K (2016) Histopathologic analysis of retrieved thrombi associated with successful reperfusion after acute stroke thrombectomy. Stroke 47:3035–3037.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang Y-H, Kim Y-W, Kang D-H, Kim YS, Liebeskind DS (2016) Impact of target arterial residual stenosis on outcome after endovascular revascularization. Stroke 47:1850–1857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tsang ACO, Orru E, Klostranec JM, Yang IH, Lau KK, Tsang FCP, Lui WM, Pereira VM, Krings T (2019) Thrombectomy outcomes of intracranial atherosclerosis-related occlusions. Stroke 50:1460–1466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, Soo YO, Pu Y, Pan Y, Wang Y, Zou X, Leung TW, Cai Y, Bai Q, Wu Y, Wang C, Pan X, Luo B, Wong KS, CICAS Study Group (2014) Prevalence and outcomes of symptomatic intracranial large artery stenoses and occlusions in China: the Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) study. Stroke 45:663–669.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li H, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Li Z, Xing P, Zhang Y, Hong B, Yang P, Liu J (2019) Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke due to intracranial atherosclerotic large vessel occlusion. Clin Neuroradiol:1–11.

  14. Mosimann PJ, Kaesmacher J, Gautschi D, Bellwald S, Panos L, Piechowiak E, Dobrocky T, Zibold F, Mordasini P, el-Koussy M, Wiest R, Bervini D, Wagner F, Arnold M, Jung S, Galimanis A, Gralla J, Fischer U (2018) Predictors of unexpected early reocclusion after successful mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke patients. Stroke 49:2643–2651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Watanabe H, Shiomi H, Nakatsuma K, Morimoto T, Taniguchi T, Furukawa Y, Nakagawa Y, Horie M, Kimura T, CREDO‐Kyoto AMI investigators, Kimura T, Sakata R, Marui A, Matsuda M, Mitsuoka H, Onoe M, Nakagawa Y, Yamanaka K, Fujiwara H, Takatsu Y, Ohno N, Nohara R, Murakami T, Takeda T, Nobuyoshi M, Iwabuchi M, Hanyu M, Tatami R, Matsushita T, Shirotani M, Nishiwaki N, Kita T, Furukawa Y, Okada Y, Kato H, Eizawa H, Is K, Tanaka M, Nakayama S, Lee JD, Nakano A, Koshiji T, Morioka K, Takizawa A, Shimamoto M, Yamazaki F, Takahashi M, Nishizawa J, Horie M, Takashima H, Tamura T, Aota M, Takahashi M, Tabata T, Tei C, Hamasaki S, Imoto Y, Yamamoto H, Kambara H, Doi O, Matsuda K, Nara M, Mitsudo K, Kadota K, Komiya T, Miki S, Mizoguchi T, Nakajima H, Ogawa H, Sugiyama S, Kawasuji M, Moriyama S, Hattori R, Aoyama T, Araki M, Suwa S, Tanbara K, Kitagawa K, Yamauchi M, Okamoto N, Fujino Y, Tezuka S, Saeki A, Hanazawa M, Sato Y, Hibi C, Sasae H, Takinami E, Uchida Y, Yamamoto Y, Nishida S, Yoshimoto M, Maeda S, Miki I, Minematsu S, Abe M, Shiomi H, Tada T, Tazaki J, Kato Y, Hayano M, Tokushige A, Natsuaki M, Nakajima T (2015) Clinical efficacy of thrombus aspiration on 5-year clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Heart Assoc 4:e001962.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdennour L, Sourour N, Drir M, Premat K, Shotar E, Taylor G, Godier A, Mathout J, Lenck S, Bernard R, Carpentier A, Degos V, Clarençon F (2019) Preliminary experience with Cangrelor for endovascular treatment of challenging intracranial aneurysms. Clin Neuroradiol:1–9.

  17. Wareham J, Flood R, Phan K et al (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational evidence for the use of bailout self-expandable stents following failed anterior circulation stroke thrombectomy. J Neurointerventl Surg 11:675–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baek J-H, Kim BM, Kim DJ, Heo JH, Nam HS, Yoo J (2016) Stenting as a rescue treatment after failure of mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large artery occlusion. Stroke 47:2360–2363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Baracchini C, Farina F, Soso M et al (2017) Stentriever Thrombectomy failure: a challenge in stroke management. World Neurosurg 103:57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chang Y, Kim BM, Bang OY, Baek JH, Heo JH, Nam HS, Kim YD, Yoo J, Kim DJ, Jeon P, Baik SK, Suh SH, Lee KY, Kwak HS, Roh HG, Lee YJ, Kim SH, Ryu CW, Ihn YK, Kim B, Jeon HJ, Kim JW, Byun JS, Suh S, Park JJ, Lee WJ, Roh J, Shin BS, Kim JM (2018) Rescue stenting for failed mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischemic stroke: a multicenter experience. Stroke 49:958–964.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornelissen SA, Andersson T, Holmberg A, Brouwer PA, Söderman M, Bhogal P, Yeo LLL (2019) Intracranial stenting after failure of thrombectomy with the emboTrap® device. Clin Neuroradiol 29:677–683.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Woo HG, Sunwoo L, Jung C, Kim BJ, Han MK, Bae HJ, Bae YJ, Choi BS, Kim JH (2018) Feasibility of permanent stenting with solitaire FR as a rescue treatment for the reperfusion of acute intracranial artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 39:331–336.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoon W, Kim SK, Park MS, Kim BC, Kang HK (2015) Endovascular treatment and the outcomes of atherosclerotic intracranial stenosis in patients with hyperacute stroke. Neurosurgery 76:680–686; discussion 686.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou T, Li T, Zhu L et al (2018) Intracranial stenting as a rescue therapy for acute ischemic stroke after stentriever thrombectomy failure. World Neurosurg 120:e181–e187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maingard J, Phan K, Lamanna A et al (2019) Rescue intracranial stenting following failed mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg.

  26. Peng F, Wan J, Liu W, et al (2019) Efficacy and safety of rescue stenting following failed mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: propensity score analysis. J NeuroInterventional Surg neurintsurg-2019-015154.

  27. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bluhmki E, Brozman M, Dávalos A, Guidetti D, Larrue V, Lees KR, Medeghri Z, Machnig T, Schneider D, von Kummer R, Wahlgren N, Toni D, ECASS Investigators (2008) Thrombolysis with alteplase 3 to 4.5 hours after acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 359:1317–1329.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of non-randomized studies in meta-analysis | Request PDF. In: ResearchGate. Accessed 9 Feb 2019

  30. Baek J-H, Kim BM, Heo JH et al (2018) Number of stent retriever passes associated with futile recanalization in acute stroke. Stroke 49:2088–2095.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hao Y, Yang D, Wang H et al (2017) Predictors for symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 48:1203–1209.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references



Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kévin Premat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

NS reports a conflict of interest with Medtronic, Balt Extrusion, Microvention (consultant) and Stock/Stock Options: Medina. FC reports a conflict of interest with Medtronic, Guerbet, Balt Extrusion (payment for readings), and Codman Neurovascular (core lab).

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 139 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Premat, K., Dechartres, A., Lenck, S. et al. Rescue stenting versus medical care alone in refractory large vessel occlusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroradiology 62, 629–637 (2020).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:


  • Stroke
  • Thrombectomy
  • Endovascular recanalization
  • Reperfusion