Skip to main content
Log in

Brain regional volume estimations with NeuroQuant and FIRST: a study in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Brain volume estimates from magnetic resonance images (MRIs) are of great interest in multiple sclerosis, and several automated tools have been developed for this purpose. The goal of this study was to assess the agreement between two tools, NeuroQuant® (NQ) and FMRIB’s Integrated Registration Segmentation Tool (FIRST), for estimating overall and regional brain volume in a cohort of patients with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS). In addition, white matter lesion volume was estimated with NQ and the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox (LST).

Methods

One hundred fifteen CIS patients were analysed. Structural images were acquired on a 3.0-T system. The volume agreement between methods (by estimation of the intraclass correlation coefficient) was calculated for the right and left thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, hippocampus, and amygdala, as well as for the total intracranial volume and white matter lesion volume.

Results

In general, the estimated volumes were larger by NQ than FIRST, except for the pallidum. Agreement was low (ICC < 0.40) for the smaller structures (amygdala and pallidum) and fair to good (ICC > 0.40) for the remaining ones. Agreement was fair for lesion volume (ICC = 0.61), with NQ estimates lower than LST.

Conclusions

Agreement between NQ and FIRST brain volume estimates depends on the size of the structure of interest, with larger volumes achieving better agreement. In addition, concordance between the two tools does seem to be dependent on the presence of brain lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tintore M, Rovira À, Río J, Otero-Romero S, Arrambide G, Tur C, Comabella M, Nos C, Arévalo MJ, Negrotto L, Galán I, Vidal-Jordana A, Castilló J, Palavra F, Simon E, Mitjana R, Auger C, Sastre-Garriga J, Montalban X. Defining high, medium and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis. Brain 2015;138(Pt 7):1863–1874

  2. Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR (2006) The neurobiology of multiple sclerosis: genes, inflammation, and neurodegeneration. Neuron 52(1):61–76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sastre-Garriga J, Pareto D, Rovira À (2017) Brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: clinical relevance and technical aspects. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 27(2):289–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ashburner J, Friston KJ (2000) Voxel-based morphometry—the methods. Neuroimage. 11(6 Pt 1):805–821

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith SM, Zhang Y, Jenkinson M, Chen J, Matthews PM, Federico A, De Stefano N (2002) Accurate, robust, and automated longitudinal and cross-sectional brain change analysis. Neuroimage 17(1):479–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patenaude B, Smith SM, Kennedy D, Jenkinson MA (2011) Bayesian model of shape and appearance for subcortical brain. NeuroImage 56(3):907–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schmidt P, Gaser C, Arsic M, Buck D, Förschler A, Berthele A, Hoshi M, Ilg R, Schmid VJ, Zimmer C, Hemmer B, Mühlau M (2012) An automated tool for detection of FLAIR-hyperintense white-matter lesions in multiple sclerosis. NeuroImage 59:3774–3783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelletier D, Garrison K, Henry R (2004) Measurement of whole-brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 14(3 Suppl):11S–19S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bermel RA, Bakshi R (2006) The measurement and clinical relevance of brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 5(2):158–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rocca MA, Battaglini M, Benedict RH, De Stefano N, Geurts JJ, Henry RG, Horsfield MA, Jenkinson M, Pagani E, Filippi M (2017) Brain MRI atrophy quantification in MS: From methods to clinical application. Neurology 88(4):403–413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ochs AL, Ross DE, Zannoni MD, Abildskov TJ, Bigler ED (2015) Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative. Comparison of automated brain volume measures obtained with NeuroQuant and FreeSurfer. J Neuroimaging 25(5):721–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang C, Beadnall HN, Hatton SN, Bader G, Tomic D, Silva DG, Barnett MH (2016) Automated brain volumetrics in multiple sclerosis: a step closer to clinical application. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 87(7):754–757

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swanton JK, Rovira A, Tintore M, Altmann DR, Barkhof F, Filippi M, Huerga E, Miszkiel KA, Plant GT, Polman C, Rovaris M, Thompson AJ, Montalban X, Miller DH (2007) MRI criteria for multiple sclerosis in patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes: a multicentre retrospective study. Lancet Neurol 6(8):677–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pareto D, Sastre-Garriga J, Aymerich FX, Auger C, Tintoré M, Montalban X, Rovira A (2016) Lesion filling effect in regional brain volume estimations. A study in multiple sclerosis patients with low lesion load. Neuroradiology 58(5):467–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gatidis S, Heber SD, Storz C, Bamberg F (2017) Population-based imaging biobanks as source of big data. Radiol Med 122(6):430–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Statistics and Bioinformatics Unit at the Vall d’Hebron Research Institute for their statistical assessment and C. Cavallo for English writing support.

Funding

This study was partially supported by Novartis Farmacéutica S.A., Barcelona (Spain), the “Red Española de Esclerosis Múltiple (REEM)” (RD07/0060; RD12/0032), which is sponsored by the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (FIS), the Instituto de Salud Carlos III, the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness in Spain and the “Ajuts per donar Suport als Grups de Recerca de Catalunya (2009 SGR 0793)”, which is sponsored by the “Agència de Gestió d’Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca” (AGAUR) of the Generalitat de Catalunya in Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Pareto.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

DP has received speaking honoraria from Sanofi-Genzyme. JS-G has received travel and accommodation grants from Merck, Novartis, TEVA, Celgene, Roche, Sanofi and Excemed. MA has been sponsored by Novartis Farmacéutica S.A., Barcelona (Spain). CA has received speaking honoraria from Novartis, Stendhal and Biogen. MT has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses from Amirall, Bayer, Biogen Idec, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche and Teva. XM has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses, and has been a steering committee member of clinical trials or participated in advisory boards of clinical trials for Actelion, Almirall, Bayer, Biogen, Celgene, Hoffmann-La Roche, Merck, Novartis, Oryzon Genomics, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva Pharmaceutical. AR has served/s on scientific advisory boards for Novartis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Icometrix, and OLEA Medical, and has received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Bracco, Merck-Serono, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Novartis, Roche and Biogen Idec.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pareto, D., Sastre-Garriga, J., Alberich, M. et al. Brain regional volume estimations with NeuroQuant and FIRST: a study in patients with a clinically isolated syndrome. Neuroradiology 61, 667–674 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02191-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02191-3

Keywords

Navigation