Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 60, Issue 10, pp 1097–1101 | Cite as

Carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection via the transbrachial approach: sheathless navigation of a 9-F balloon-guiding catheter

  • Junpei Koge
  • Tomonori Iwata
  • Tetsuya Hashimoto
  • Shigehisa Mizuta
  • Yukihiko Nakamura
  • Eri Tanaka
  • Masakazu Kawajiri
  • Shun-ichi Matsumoto
  • Takeshi Yamada
Short Report
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Transbrachial carotid artery stenting (TB-CAS) is performed as an alternative procedure for patients with hostile vascular anatomy of the aortic arch and aortic or peripheral artery disease. Proximal protection during TB-CAS is not generally feasible because a small size of the brachial artery may preclude using a large-diameter sheath introducer. We, herein present a novel method that enables proximal protection during TB-CAS by sheathless navigation of a 9-F balloon-guiding catheter equivalent to a 7-F sheath.

Methods

We analyzed eight consecutive patients who underwent TB-CAS with proximal protection using the sheathless method from April 2016 to June 2017. Relevant demographic, radiographic, and procedural features were retrospectively reviewed.

Results

We performed TB-CAS using our method for five patients with a bovine or type 3 aortic arch, for one patient with combined peripheral artery disease, and for two patients with a type 1 or 2 aortic arch. We successfully navigated the balloon-guiding catheter via the brachial artery and performed CAS under proximal flow control in all patients. However, we experienced kinking and exchange of the balloon-guiding catheter in one patient and a periprocedural thromboembolic event occurred. A pseudoaneurysm at the access site developed in one patient.

Conclusion

TB-CAS with proximal embolic protection using the sheathless method is feasible and may provide an alternative approach in carefully selected patients who have difficult anatomy in the transfemoral approach and plaques with a high risk of distal embolization.

Keywords

Carotid artery disease Carotid artery stenting Transbrachial approach Embolic protection 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures in studies involving human participants were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel GJ, Bajwa TK, Whitlow P, Strickman NE, Jaff MR, Popma JJ, Snead DB, Cutlip DE, Firth BG, Ouriel K (2004) Stenting and angioplasty with protection in patients at high risk for endarterectomy investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinter L, Cagiannos C, Ruzsa Z, Bakoyiannis C, Kolvenbach R (2007) Report on initial experience with transradial access for carotid artery stenting. J Vasc Surg 45:1136–1141CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Lualdi A, Ballerini G, Andreini D, Pontone G, Caputi L, Bartorelli AL (2014) Carotid artery stenting in patients with left ICA stenosis and bovine aortic arch: a single-center experience in 60 consecutive patients treated via the right radial or brachial approach. J Endovasc Ther 21:127–136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani P, Ghulam Ali S, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Lualdi A, Ballerini G, Andreini D, Pontone G, Annoni A, Bartorelli AL (2009) Carotid stenting through the right brachial approach for left internal carotid artery stenosis and bovine aortic arch configuration. Eur Radiol 19:2009–2015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trani C, Burzotta F, Coroleu SF (2009) Transradial carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:267–272PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bijuklic K, Wandler A, Hazizi F, Schofer J (2012) The PROFI study (prevention of cerebral embolization by proximal balloon occlusion compared to filter protection during carotid artery stenting): a prospective randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 59:1383–1389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Montorsi P, Caputi L, Galli S, Ciceri E, Ballerini G, Agrifoglio M, Ravagnani P, Trabattoni D, Pontone G, Fabbiocchi F, Loaldi A, Parati E, Andreini D, Veglia F, Bartorelli AL (2011) Microembolization during carotid artery stenting in patients with high-risk, lipid-rich plaque. A randomized trial of proximal versus distal cerebral protection. J Am Coll Cardiol 58:1656–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Montorsi P, Galli S, Ravagnani PM, Tresoldi S, Teruzzi G, Caputi L, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Calligaris G, Grancini L, Lualdi A, de Martini S, Bartorelli AL (2016) Carotid artery stenting with proximal embolic protection via a transradial or transbrachial approach: pushing the boundaries of the technique while maintaining safety and efficacy. J Endovasc Ther 23:549–560CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harada K, Kakumoto K, Oshikata S, Fukuyama K (2018) Predictors of antegrade flow at internal carotid artery during carotid artery stenting with proximal protection. Acta Neurochir 160:1121–1127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stavroulakis K, Usai MV, Torsello G, Schwindt A, Stachmann A, Beropoulis E, Bisdas T (2016) Efficacy and safety of transbrachial access for iliac endovascular interventions. J Endovasc Ther 23:454–460CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Treitl KM, König C, Reiser MF, Treitl M (2015) Complications of transbrachial arterial access for peripheral endovascular interventions. J Endovasc Ther 22:63–70CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurologySaiseikai Fukuoka General HospitalFukuoka CityJapan
  2. 2.Department of Vascular NeurologySaiseikai Fukuoka General HospitalFukuoka CityJapan
  3. 3.Department of NeurosurgerySaiseikai Fukuoka General HospitalFukuoka CityJapan
  4. 4.Department of RadiologySaiseikai Fukuoka General HospitalFukuoka CityJapan

Personalised recommendations