Skip to main content
Log in

Brain computed tomography using iterative reconstruction to diagnose acute middle cerebral artery stroke: usefulness in combination of narrow window setting and thin slice reconstruction

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine whether iterative model reconstruction (IMR) optimized for brain CT could improve the detection of acute stroke in the setting of thin image slices and narrow window settings.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 27 patients who presented acute middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Images were reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP; 1- and 5-mm slice thickness) and IMR (1 mm thickness), and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of infarcted and non-infarcted areas were compared. To analyze the performance of acute MCA stroke detection, we used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve techniques and compared 5-mm FBP with standard and narrow window settings, and 1-mm FBP and IMR with narrow window settings.

Results

The CNR in 1-mm IMR (1.1 ± 1.0) was significantly higher than in 5- (0.8 ± 0.7) and 1-mm FBP (0.4 ± 0.4) (p < 0.001). Furthermore, the average area under the ROC curve was significantly higher with 1-mm IMR with narrow window settings (0.90, 95% CI: 0.86, 0.94) than it was with 5-mm FBP (0.78, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.83).

Conclusion

The combination of thin image slices and narrow window settings under IMR reconstruction provide better diagnostic performance for acute MCA stroke than conventional reconstruction methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bernick C, Kuller L, Dulberg C, Longstreth WT Jr, Manolio T, Beauchamp N, Price T, Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Reseach G (2001) Silent MRI infarcts and the risk of future stroke: the cardiovascular health study. Neurology 57(7):1222–1229. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.57.7.1222

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM (2000) Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS Study Group. Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score. Lancet 355(9216):1670–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02237-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hill MD, Demchuk AM, Tomsick TA, Palesch YY, Broderick JP (2006) Using the baseline CT scan to select acute stroke patients for IV-IA therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(8):1612–1616

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tamm EP, Rong XJ, Cody DD, Ernst RD, Fitzgerald NE, Kundra V (2011) Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. Radiographics 31(7):1823–1832. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.317115027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lev MH, Farkas J, Gemmete JJ, Hossain ST, Hunter GJ, Koroshetz WJ, Gonzalez RG (1999) Acute stroke: improved nonenhanced CT detection—benefits of soft-copy interpretation by using variable window width and center level settings. Radiology 213(1):150–155. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.213.1.r99oc10150

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ogawa A, Mori E, Minematsu K, Taki W, Takahashi A, Nemoto S, Miyamoto S, Sasaki M, Inoue T, Group MJS (2007) Randomized trial of intraarterial infusion of urokinase within 6 hours of middle cerebral artery stroke: the middle cerebral artery embolism local fibrinolytic intervention trial (MELT) Japan. Stroke 38(10):2633–2639. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.488551

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang W, Lee JM, Lee K, Yoon JH, Yu MH, Han JK, Choi BI (2013) Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography. Investig Radiol 48(8):598–606. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182899104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Deak Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Korner M, Reiser MF, Wirth S (2013) Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 266(1):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12112707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Tang J, Ruma JA, del Rio AM, Chen GH (2012) Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 199(6):1266–1274. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.12.9382

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, Sato J, Akai H, Yasaka K, Kunimatsu A, Ohtomo K (2012) Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 22(8):1613–1623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2452-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakaura T, Iyama Y, Kidoh M, Yokoyama K, Oda S, Tokuyasu S, Harada K, Yamashita Y (2016) Comparison of iterative model, hybrid iterative, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques in low-dose brain CT: impact of thin-slice imaging. Neuroradiology 58(3):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1631-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koc G, Courtier JL, Phelps A, Marcovici PA, MacKenzie JD (2014) Computed tomography depiction of small pediatric vessels with model-based iterative reconstruction. Pediatr Radiol 44(7):787–794. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-2899-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayo-Smith WW, Gupta H, Ridlen MS, Brody JM, Clements NC, Cronan JJ (1999) Detecting hepatic lesions: the added utility of CT liver window settings. Radiology 210(3):601–604. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99mr07601

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bach AM, Panicek DM, Schwartz LH, Herman SK, Ho MN, Castellino RA (1995) CT bone window photography in patients with cancer. Radiology 197(3):849–852. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480767

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Hudon ME, Pexman JH, Hill MD, Buchan AM (2001) Hyperdense sylvian fissure MCA “dot” sign: a CT marker of acute ischemia. Stroke 32(1):84–88. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.1.84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Qureshi AI, Ezzeddine MA, Nasar A, Suri MF, Kirmani JF, Janjua N, Divani AA (2006) Is IV tissue plasminogen activator beneficial in patients with hyperdense artery sign? Neurology 66(8):1171–1174. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000208407.69544.5a

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mainali S, Wahba M, Elijovich L (2014) Detection of early ischemic changes in noncontrast CT head improved with “stroke windows”. ISRN Neurosci 2014(654980):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/654980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Park HJ, Lee JM, Park SB, Lee JB, Jeong YK, Yoon JH (2016) Comparison of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction and hybrid reconstruction techniques for liver CT evaluation of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 40(6):863–871. https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000455

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Aurumskjold ML, Ydstrom K, Tingberg A, Soderberg M (2016) Model-based iterative reconstruction enables the evaluation of thin-slice computed tomography images without degrading image quality or increasing radiation dose. Radiat Prot Dosim 169(1-4):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncv474

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taihei Inoue.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inoue, T., Nakaura, T., Yoshida, M. et al. Brain computed tomography using iterative reconstruction to diagnose acute middle cerebral artery stroke: usefulness in combination of narrow window setting and thin slice reconstruction. Neuroradiology 60, 373–379 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1982-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1982-8

Keywords

Navigation