Advertisement

Neuroradiology

, Volume 59, Issue 5, pp 477–484 | Cite as

Radiological imaging features of the basal ganglia that may predict progression to hemicraniectomy in large territory middle cerebral artery infarct

  • Asim Z. Mian
  • David Edasery
  • Osamu Sakai
  • M. Mustafa Qureshi
  • James Holsapple
  • Thanh Nguyen
Diagnostic Neuroradiology

Abstract

Purpose

Predicting which patients are at risk for hemicraniectomy can be helpful for triage and can help preserve neurologic function if detected early. We evaluated basal ganglia imaging predictors for early hemicraniectomy in patients with large territory anterior circulation infarct.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated patients with ischemic infarct admitted from January 2005 to July 2011. Patients with malignant cerebral edema refractory to medical therapy or with herniating signs such as depressed level of consciousness, anisocoria, and contralateral leg weakness were triaged to hemicraniectomy. Admission images were reviewed for presence of caudate, lentiform nucleus (putamen and globus pallidus), or basal ganglia (caudate + lentiform nucleus) infarction.

Results

Thirty-one patients with large territory MCA infarct, 10 (32%), underwent hemicraniectomy. Infarction of the caudate nucleus (9/10 vs 6/21, p = 0.002) or basal ganglia (5/10 vs 2/21, p = 0.02) predicted progression to hemicraniectomy. Infarction of the lentiform nucleus only did not predict progression to hemicraniectomy. Sensitivity for patients who did and did not have hemicraniectomy were 50% (5/10) and 90.5% (19/21). For caudate nucleus and caudate plus lentiform nucleus infarcts, the crude- and age-adjusted odds of progression to hemicraniectomy were 9.5 (1.4–64.3) and 6.6 (0.78–55.4), respectively.

Conclusion

Infarction of the caudate nucleus or basal ganglia correlated with patients progressing to hemicraniectomy. Infarction of the lentiform nucleus alone did not.

Keywords

Stroke Basal ganglia Hemicraniectomy CT MRI 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Statement of informed consent was not applicable since the manuscript does not contain any patient data.

References

  1. 1.
    Hacke W, Schwab S, Horn M, Spranger M, De Georgia M, von Kummer R (1996) ’Malignant’ middle cerebral artery territory infarction: clinical course and prognostic signs. Arch Neurol 53(4):309–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hofmeijer J, Kappelle LJ, Algra A et al (2009) Surgical decompression for space-occupying cerebral infarction (the hemicraniectomy after middle cerebral artery infarction with life-threatening edema trial [HAMLET]): a multicentre, open, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 8(4):326–333CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Juttler E, Schwab S, Schmiedek P et al (2007) Decompressive surgery for the treatment of malignant infarction of the middle cerebral artery (DESTINY): a randomized, controlled trial. Stroke 38(9):2518–2525CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vahedi K, Vicaut E, Mateo J et al (2007) Sequential-design, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of early decompressive craniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction (DECIMAL trial). Stroke 38(9):2506–2517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arnaout OM, Aoun SG, Batjer HH, Bendok BR (2011) Decompressive hemicraniectomy after malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: rationale and controversies. Neurosurg Focus 30(6):E18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rahme R, Curry R, Kleindorfer D, Khoury JC et al (2012) How often are patients with ischemic stroke eligible for decompressive hemicraniectomy? Stroke 43(2):550–552CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Staykov D, Gupta R (2011) Hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarction. Stroke 42(2):513–516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barber PA, Demchuk AM, Zhang J, Buchan AM (2000) Validity and reliability of a quantitative computed tomography score in predicting outcome of hyperacute stroke before thrombolytic therapy. ASPECTS study group. alberta stroke programme early CT score. Lancet 355(9216):1670–1674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Puetz V, Dzialowski I, Hill MD, Demchuk AM (2009) The Alberta stroke program early CT score in clinical practice: what have we learned? Int J Stroke 4(5):354–364CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barber PA, Hill MD, Eliasziw M et al (2005) Imaging of the brain in acute ischaemic stroke: comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76(11):1528–1533CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mitomi M, Kimura K, Aoki J et al (2014) Comparison of CT and DWI findings in ischemic stroke patients within 3 hours of onset. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 23(1):37–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delashaw JB, Broaddus WC, Kassell NF et al (1990) Treatment of right hemispheric cerebral infarction by hemicraniectomy. Stroke 21(6):874–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Back L, Nagaraja V, Kapur A et al (2015) Role of decompressive hemicraniectomy in extensive middle cerebral artery strokes: a meta analysis of randomised trials. Intern Med J 45(7):711–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rieke K, Schwab S, Krieger D et al (1995) Decompressive surgery in space-occupying hemispheric infarction: results of an open, prospective trial. Crit Care Med 23(9):1576–1587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rengachary SS, Batnitzky S, Morantz RA, Arjunan K, Jeffries B (1981) Hemicraniectomy for acute massive cerebral infarction. Neurosurgery 8(3):321–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang MH, Lin HY, Fu J et al (2015) Decompressive hemicraniectomy in patients with malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgeon 13(4):230–240CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhao J, Su YY, Zhang Y et al (2012) Decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant middle cerebral artery infarct: a randomized controlled trial enrolling patients up to 80 years old. Neurocrit Care 17(2):161–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Staykov D, Schwab S (2012) Should age be considered when proposing decompressive hemicraniectomy in malignant stroke, and if so where is the limit? Neurocrit Care 17(2):159–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Juttler E, Bosel J, Amiri H et al (2011) DESTINY II: DEcompressive surgery for the treatment of malignant INfarction of the middle cerebral arterY II. Int J Stroke 6(1):79–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Juttler E, Unterberg A, Woitzik J et al (2014) Hemicraniectomy in older patients with extensive middle-cerebral-artery stroke. N Engl J Med 370(12):1091–1100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Holtkamp M, Buchheim K, Unterberg A et al (2001) Hemicraniectomy in elderly patients with space occupying media infarction: improved survival but poor functional outcome. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70(2):226–228CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uhl E, Kreth FW, Elias B et al (2004) Outcome and prognostic factors of hemicraniectomy for space occupying cerebral infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75(2):270–274PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hao Z, Chang X, Zhou H, Lin S, Liu M (2015) A cohort study of decompressive craniectomy for malignant middle cerebral artery infarction: a real-world experience in clinical practice. Bix. G, ed. Medicine 94(25):e1039CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    van Swieten JC, Koudstaal PJ, Visser MC, Schouten HJ, van Gijn J (1988) Interobserver agreement for the assessment of handicap in stroke patients. Stroke 19(5):604–607CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asim Z. Mian
    • 1
  • David Edasery
    • 1
  • Osamu Sakai
    • 1
  • M. Mustafa Qureshi
    • 1
  • James Holsapple
    • 2
  • Thanh Nguyen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Radiology, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA
  3. 3.Department of Neurology, Boston Medical CenterBoston University School of MedicineBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations