Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Outcomes of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting with Wingspan at a high-volume center

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study was to investigate the periprocedural stroke rates, safety, and long-term effect of Wingspan stenting for symptomatic severe stenosis of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) at a high-volume center.

Methods

Between July 2007 and April 2013, 196 consecutive patients with severe MCA atherosclerotic stenosis (≥70 %) who were treated with Wingspan stenting were retrospectively studied. All patients had arterial stenosis-related temporary ischemic attack or strokes. The demographic data, cerebral angiography, technical success rate, periprocedural complications, and clinical and imaging follow-up were analyzed.

Results

The successful stenting rate was 98.0 %, and the stenosis rate was improved from pre-stenting (80.6 ± 8.3 %) to post-stenting (15.5 ± 6.8 %). The 30-day periprocedural stroke or death rate was 7.1 %, with a disabling or fatal rate of 2.6 %. The perioprocedural stroke rate was significantly (P < 0.01) greater in the early learning stage (16.0 %) than in the later technical maturation stage (4.1 %). The total periprocedural ischemic and perforator stroke rates were greater in patients with the most stenosis in the distal MCA 1/3 segment (6.8 and 5.7 %, respectively) than in the proximal and middle 2/3 segments (0.9 and 0 %, respectively). The ipsilateral stroke or death rate beyond 30 days (6–69 months, mean 30 ± 16) was 4.8 %, with the 1- and 2-year cumulative stroke rates of 9.6 and 12.1 %, respectively. Imaging follow-up 6–69 months (mean 10.9 ± 8.5) revealed restenosis in 21 cases (20.4 %).

Conclusion

Intracranial stenting of MCA stenoses may have the potential of better clinical outcomes if patients are properly selected and treated by an experienced operator at a high-volume center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Hasan M, Murugan R (2012) Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis: more harm than good. Crit Care 16:310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sacco RL, Kargman DE, Gu Q, Zamanillo MC (1995) Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study. Stroke 26:14–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zaidat OO, Klucznik R, Alexander MJ et al (2008) The NIH registry on use of the Wingspan stent for symptomatic 70-99% intracranial arterial stenosis. Neurology 70:1518–1524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wong KS, Huang YN, Gao S, Lam WW, Chan YL, Kay R (1998) Intracranial stenosis in Chinese patients with acute stroke. Neurology 50:812–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H et al (2005) Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 352:1305–1316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Derdeyn CP et al (2011) Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med 365:993–1003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang WJ, Xu XT, Du B et al (2007) Comparison of elective stenting of severe vs moderate intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 68:420–426

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jiang WJ, Yu W, Du B, Gao F, Cui LY (2011) Outcome of patients with >/=70% symptomatic intracranial stenosis after Wingspan stenting. Stroke 42:1971–1975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park S, Kim JH, Kwak JK et al (2013) Intracranial stenting for severe symptomatic stenosis: self-expandable versus balloon-expandable stents. Interv Neuroradiol 19:276–282

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Turk AS, Levy EI, Albuquerque FC et al (2008) Influence of patient age and stenosis location on wingspan in-stent restenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:23–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu SC, Leung TW, Lee KT, Hui JW, Wong LK (2011) Angioplasty and stenting of atherosclerotic middle cerebral arteries with Wingspan: evaluation of clinical outcome, restenosis, and procedure outcome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:753–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu SC, Leung TW, Lee KT, Wong LK (2014) Angioplasty and stenting of intracranial atherosclerosis with the Wingspan system: 1-year clinical and radiological outcome in a single Asian center. J Neurointerv Surg 6:96–102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Derdeyn CP, Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ et al (2014) Aggressive medical treatment with or without stenting in high-risk patients with intracranial artery stenosis (SAMMPRIS): the final results of a randomised trial. Lancet 383:333–341

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo XB, Ma N, Hu XB, Guan S, Fan YM (2011) Wingspan stent for symptomatic M1 stenosis of middle cerebral artery. Eur J Radiol 80:e356–e360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wolfe TJ, Fitzsimmons BF, Hussain SI, Lynch JR, Zaidat OO (2009) Long term clinical and angiographic outcomes with the Wingspan stent for treatment of symptomatic 50-99% intracranial atherosclerosis: single center experience in 51 cases. J Neurointerv Surg 1:40–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu SC, Leung TW, Lee KT, Wong LK (2014) Learning curve of Wingspan stenting for intracranial atherosclerosis: single-center experience of 95 consecutive patients. J Neurointerv Surg 6:212–218

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang L, Huang Q, Zhang Y et al (2013) A single-center study of Wingspan stents for symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis of the middle cerebral artery. J Clin Neurosci 20:362–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang L, Huang Q, Zhang Y et al (2012) Wingspan stents for the treatment of symptomatic atherosclerotic stenosis in small intracranial vessels: safety and efficacy evaluation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33:343–347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Turan TN et al (2011) Design of the stenting and aggressive medical management for preventing recurrent stroke in intracranial stenosis trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 20:357–368

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein LB, Bushnell CD, Adams RJ et al (2011) Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 42:517–584

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van Mook WN, Rennenberg RJ, Schurink GW et al (2005) Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome. Lancet Neurol 4:877–888

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang WJ, Srivastava T, Gao F, Du B, Dong KH, Xu XT (2006) Perforator stroke after elective stenting of symptomatic intracranial stenosis. Neurology 66:1868–1872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P et al (2007) The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 70:1025–1033

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Derdeyn CP, Fiorella D, Lynn MJ et al (2013) Impact of operator and site experience on outcomes after angioplasty and stenting in the SAMMPRIS trial. J Neurointerv Surg 5:528–533

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang WJ, Du B, Leung TW, Xu XT, Jin M, Dong KH (2007) Symptomatic intracranial stenosis: cerebrovascular complications from elective stent placement. Radiology 243:188–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miao ZR, Feng L, Li S et al (2009) Treatment of symptomatic middle cerebral artery stenosis with balloon-mounted stents: long-term follow-up at a single center. Neurosurgery 64:79–84, discussion 84-75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Caplan LR, Gorelick PB, Hier DB (1986) Race, sex and occlusive cerebrovascular disease: a review. Stroke 17:648–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wong LK (2006) Global burden of intracranial atherosclerosis. Int J Stroke 1:158–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian-Xiao Li.

Ethics declarations

We declare that all human studies have been approved by the Ethics Committee of Henan Provincial People’s Hospital and have therefore performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Z-LW and B-LG contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, ZL., Gao, BL., Li, TX. et al. Outcomes of middle cerebral artery angioplasty and stenting with Wingspan at a high-volume center. Neuroradiology 58, 161–169 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1611-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-015-1611-8

Keywords

Navigation