Skip to main content
Log in

Isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo Cube magnetic resonance dacryocystography: comparison with the three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo technique

  • Diagnostic Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Three-dimensional fast spin-echo Cube (3D-FSE-Cube) uses modulated refocusing flip angles and autocalibrates two dimensional (2D)-accelerated parallel and nonlinear view ordering to produce high-quality volumetric image sets with high-spatial resolution. Furthermore, 3D-FSE-Cube with topical instillation of fluid can also be used for magnetic resonance dacryocystography (MRD) with good soft tissue contrast. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical quality and visualization of the lacrimal drainage system (LDS) when using the 3D-FSE-Cube sequence and the 3D fast-recovery fast spin-echo (FRFSE) sequence.

Methods

In total, 75 patients with primary LDS outflow impairment or postsurgical recurrent epiphora underwent 3D-FSE-Cube MRD and 3D-FRFSE MRD at 3.0 T after topical administration of compound sodium chloride eye drops. Two radiologists graded the images from either of the two sequences in a blinded fashion, and appropriate statistical tests were used to assess differences in technical quality, visibility of ductal segments, and number of segments visualized per LDS.

Results

Obstructions were confirmed in 90 of the 150 LDSs assessed. The technical quality of 3D-FSE-Cube MRD and 3D-FRFSE MRD was statistically equivalent (P = 0.871). However, compared with 3D-FRFSE MRD, 3D-FSE-Cube MRD improved the overall visibility and the visibility of the upper drainage segments in normal and obstructed LDSs (P < 0.001). There was a corresponding increase in the number of segments visualized per LDS in both groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Compared with 3D-FRFSE MRD, 3D-FSE-Cube MRD potentially improves the visibility of the LDS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffmann KT, Hosten N, Anders N et al (1999) High-resolution conjunctival contrast-enhanced MRI dacryocystography. Neuroradiology 41:208–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jing Z, Lang C, Qiu-Xia W et al (2013) High-spatial-resolution isotropic three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo magnetic resonance dacryocystography combined with topical administration of sterile saline solution. Eur J Radiol 82:1546–1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Caldemeyer KS, Stockberger SM Jr, Broderick LS (1998) Topical contrast-enhanced CT and MR dacryocystography: imaging the lacrimal drainage apparatus of healthy volunteers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1501–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshikawa T, Hirota S, Sugimura K (2000) Topical contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance dacryocystography. Radiat Med 18:355–362

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Busse RF, Hariharan H, Vu A et al (2006) Fast spin echo sequences with very long echo trains: design of variable refocusing flip angle schedules and generation of clinical T2 contrast. Magn Reson Med 55:1030–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gold GE, Busse RF, Beehler C et al (2007) Isotropic MRI of the knee with 3D fast spin-echo extended echo-train acquisition (XETA): initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1287–1293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens KJ, Busse RF, Han E et al (2008) Ankle: isotropic MR imaging with 3D-FSE-cube—initial experience in healthy volunteers. Radiology 249:1026–1033

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moraal B, Roosendaal SD, Pouwels PJ et al (2008) Multi-contrast, isotropic, single-slab 3D MR imaging in multiple sclerosis. Eur Radiol 18:2311–2320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Agrawal G, Riherd JM, Busse RF et al (2009) Evaluation of uterine anomalies: 3D FRFSE cube versus standard 2D FRFSE. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:W558–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shahid KR, Spinner RJ, Skinner JA et al (2010) Evaluation of intraneural ganglion cysts using three-dimensional fast spin echo-cube. J Magn Reson Imaging 32:714–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirchhof K, Hahnel S, Jansen O et al (2000) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance dacryocystography in patients with epiphora. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:327–331

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cubuk R, Tasali N, Aydin S et al (2010) Dynamic MR dacryocystography in patients with epiphora. Eur J Radiol 73:230–233

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Busse RF, Brau AC, Vu A et al (2008) Effects of refocusing flip angle modulation and view ordering in 3D fast spin echo. Magn Reson Med 60:640–649

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Alsop DC (1997) The sensitivity of low flip angle RARE imaging. Magn Reson Med 37:176–184

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hennig J, Weigel M, Scheffler K (2003) Multiecho sequences with variable refocusing flip angles: optimization of signal behavior using smooth transitions between pseudo steady states (TRAPS). Magn Reson Med 49:527–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrick RC, Hayman LA, Taber KH et al (1997) Artifacts and pitfalls in MR imaging of the orbit: a clinical review. Radiographics 17:707–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mugler JP III, Bao S, Mulkern RV et al (2000) Optimized single-slab three-dimensional spin-echo MR imaging of the brain. Radiology 216:891–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mitsouras D, Mulkern RV, Rybicki FJ (2006) Strategies for inner volume 3D fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging using nonselective refocusing radio frequency pulses. Med Phys 33:173–186

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Busse RF, Riederer SJ, Fletcher JG et al (2000) Interactive fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 44:339–348

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81301192) and the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province, China (No. 2012FFB02608, 2012FKB02439).

Ethical standards and patient consent

We declare that all human studies have been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College, Huazhong Universitity of Science and Technology, and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. We declare that all patients gave informed consent prior to inclusion in this study.

Conflict of interest

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lang Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Chen, L., Wang, QX. et al. Isotropic three-dimensional fast spin-echo Cube magnetic resonance dacryocystography: comparison with the three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo technique. Neuroradiology 57, 357–365 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1484-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-014-1484-2

Keywords

Navigation