Skip to main content

Volume changes of extremely large and giant intracranial aneurysms after treatment with flow diverter stents



This study assessed volume changes of unruptured large and giant aneurysms (greatest diameter >20 mm) after treatment with flow diverter (FD) stents.


Clinical audit of the cases treated in a single institution, over a 5-year period. Demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected from the hospital records. Aneurysm volumes were measured by manual outlining at sequential slices using computerised tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR) angiography data.


The audit included eight patients (seven females) with eight aneurysms. Four aneurysms involved the cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA), three the supraclinoid ICA and one the basilar artery. Seven patients presented with signs and symptoms of mass effect and one with seizures. All but one aneurysm was treated with a single FD stent; six aneurysms were also coiled (either before or simultaneously with FD placement). Minimum follow-up time was 6 months (mean 20 months). At follow-up, three aneurysms decreased in size, three were unchanged and two increased. Both aneurysms that increased in size showed persistent endosaccular flow at follow-up MR; in one case, failure was attributed to suboptimal position of the stent; in the other case, it was attributed to persistence of a side branch originating from the aneurysm (similar to the endoleak phenomenon of aortic aneurysms). At follow-up, five aneurysms were completely occluded; none of these increased in volume.


Complete occlusion of the aneurysms leads, in most cases, to its shrinkage. In cases of late aneurysm growth or regrowth, consideration should be given to possible endoleak as the cause.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4


  1. Augsburger L, Farhat M, Reymond P et al (2009) Effect of flow diverter porosity on intraaneurysmal blood flow. Klin Neuroradiol 19(3):204–214

    Google Scholar 

  2. Byrne JV, Szikora I (2012) Flow diverters in the management of intracranial aneurysms: a review. EJMINT 2012:1225000057

  3. Szikora I, Nelson PK, Berentei Z et al (2008) The potential of flow modification in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Interv Neuroradiol 14(Suppl 1):77–80

    Google Scholar 

  4. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z et al (2010) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(6):1139–1147

    Google Scholar 

  5. Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA et al (2010) Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 5(9)

  6. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G et al (2010) Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 41(10):2247–2253

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wagner A, Cortsen M, Hauberberg J et al (2012) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent. Neuroradiology 54(7):709–718

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nelson PK, Lylyk P, Szikora I et al (2011) The pipeline embolization device for the intracranial treatment of aneurysms trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(1):34–40

    Google Scholar 

  9. Berge J, Biondi A, Machi P et al (2012) Flow-diverter silk stent for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: 1-year follow-up in a multicenter study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(6):1150–1155

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R et al (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64(4):632–642, discussion 642-3; quiz N6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I et al (2013) Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology 267(3):858–868

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klisch J, Turk A, Turner R et al (2011) Very late thrombosis of flow-diverting constructs after the treatment of large fusiform posterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(4):627–632

    Google Scholar 

  13. Briganti F, Napoli M, Tortora F et al (2012) Italian multicenter experience with flow-diverter devices for intracranial unruptured aneurysm treatment with periprocedural complications—a retrospective data analysis. Neuroradiology 54(10):1145–1152

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larrabide I, Aguilar ML, Morales HG et al (2013) Intra-aneurysmal pressure and flow changes induced by flow diverters: relation to aneurysm size and shape. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(4):816–822

    Google Scholar 

  15. Saatci I, Yavuz K, Ozer C et al (2012) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using the pipeline flow-diverter embolization device: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(8):1436–1446

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leonardi M, Cirillo L, Toni F et al (2011) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms using flow-diverting silk stents (BALT): a single centre experience. Interv Neuroradiol 17(3):306–315

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pierot L (2011) Flow diverter stents in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: where are we? J Neuroradiol 38(1):40–46

    Google Scholar 

  18. Maimon S, Gonen L, Nossek E et al (2012) Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years’ experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(6):979–987

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fischer S, Vajda Z, Perez MA et al (2012) Pipeline embolization device (PED) for neurovascular reconstruction: initial experience in the treatment of 101 intracranial aneurysms and dissections. Neuroradiology 54(4):369–382

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu SC, Kwok CK, Cheng PW et al (2012) Intracranial aneurysms: midterm outcome of pipeline embolization device—a prospective study in 143 patients with 178 aneurysms. Radiology 265(3):893–901

    Google Scholar 

  21. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsar Z et al (2011) Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 53(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kulcsar Z, Houdalt E, Bonafe A et al (2011) Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(1):20–25

    Google Scholar 

  23. Szikora I, Marosfői M, Salomváry B et al (2013) Resolution of mass effect and compression symptoms following endoluminal flow diversion for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34(5):935–939

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cebral JR, Mut F, Raschi M et al (2011) Aneurysm rupture following treatment with flow-diverting stents: computational hemodynamics analysis of treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32(1):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kulcsar Z, Augsburger L, Reymond P et al (2012) Flow diversion treatment: intra-aneurismal blood flow velocity and WSS reduction are parameters to predict aneurysm thrombosis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 154(10):1827–1834

    Google Scholar 

  26. White GH, Yu W, May J et al (1997) Endoleak as a complication of endoluminal grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysm: classification, incidence, diagnosis, and management. J Endovasc Surg 4:152–168

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

JVB’s Department provides independent image reading services to Balt International under an institutional contract.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to James V. Byrne.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carneiro, A., Rane, N., Küker, W. et al. Volume changes of extremely large and giant intracranial aneurysms after treatment with flow diverter stents. Neuroradiology 56, 51–58 (2014).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: