Treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Reconstruction of the parent artery with flow-diverting (Silk) stent
- 531 Downloads
Since the flow diverters (FDs) have been introduced it is possible to treat aneurysms that are considered difficult or impossible to treat with usual endovascular or surgical methods. It is still uncertain which aneurysms are suitable for this new treatment. We present the periprocedural complications, immediate result, late complications, imaging follow-up at 6 and 12 months and clinical follow-up at 2–23 months.
Twenty-two patients with 26 wide-necked or blister-like aneurysms had 23 treatments with implantation of a Silk stent. Eleven patients had re-canalizations, and 11 patients were either untreated or had been treated for another aneurysm.
Periprocedural complications were seen in four treatments (17%). However, none of these had clinical consequences. Mortality and morbidity rates were 1 of 22 (5%) and 1 of 22 (5%), respectively. Clinical outcome was unchanged in 16 patients (72%), 3 patients improved (14%) and 3 patients worsened (14%). The end-of-procedure angiography did not show complete occlusion of any of the aneurysms, but at 6 months follow-up angiography, 17 of 25 aneurysms (68%) were completely occluded, and at 12 months, 18 of 21 aneurysms (86%) were occluded.
The effect of the Silk FD in terms of occlusion of the aneurysms seems to occur mainly during the first 6 months after placement but continues during the following time. Most delayed complications occur immediately after discontinuing the anticoagulation medication. Considering the complexity of the aneurysms treated, the rate of complications is acceptable.
KeywordsWide neck aneurysms Silk embolization device Flow diversion Cerebral aneurysm Stent
Conflict of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, Birks J, Kamran M (2010) Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLoS One 5(9)Google Scholar
- 5.Cirillo L, Dall'olio M, Princiotta C, Simonetti A, Stafa A, Toni F, Leonardi M (2010) The use of flow-diverting stents in the treatment of giant cerebral aneurysms: preliminary results. J Neuroradiol 23:220–224Google Scholar
- 6.Kulcsár Z, Ernemann U, Wetzel SG, Bock A, Goericke S, Panagiotopoulos V, Forsting M, Ruefenacht DA, Wanke I (2010) High-profile flow diverter (Silk) implantation in the basilar artery: efficacy in the treatment of aneurysms and the role of the perforators. Stroke 41:1690–1696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsár Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, Berez A, Nelson PK (2010) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31:1139–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Pumar JM, Garcia-Dorrego R, Nieto A, Vazquez-Herrero F, Blanco-Ulla M, Vazquez-Martin A (2010) Vascular reconstruction of a fusiform basilar aneurysm with the Silk embolization device. J NeuroIntervent Surg. doi: 10.1136/jnis.2010.002725
- 16.Kulcsár Z, Houdart E, Bonafe A, Parker G, Millar J, Goddard AJ, Renowden S, Gal G, Turowski B, Mitchell K, Gray F, Rodriguez M, van den Berg R, Gruber A, Desal H, Wanke I, Rufenacht DA (2011) Intra-aneurysmal thrombosis as a possible cause of delayed aneurysm rupture after flow-diversion treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 32:20–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar