Abstract
Introduction
To obtain measurements of the normal fetal brain before 24 weeks of gestation (GW), a deadline for medical decisions on fetal viability in a large number of countries.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 70 normal MR examinations of fetuses aged GW 17 to 23. The fronto-occipital diameter, the cerebral bi-parietal diameter, the transverse cerebellar diameter, the vermian height, and antero-posterior diameter were measured.
Results
The median, maximum, and minimum values for each parameter were displayed for each individual GW.
Conclusion
The recorded data might contribute to a better assessment of fetal health by providing normal boundaries for the brain growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Levine D, Barnes PD, Robertson RR, Wong G, Mehta TS (2003) Fast MR imaging of fetal central nervous system abnormalities. Radiology 229(1):51–61. doi:10.1148/radiol.2291020770
Whitby EH, Paley MN, Sprigg A et al (2004) Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG 111(8):784–792. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00149.x
Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A, Cohen HL (2001) Ultrasonography of the prenatal and neonatal brain. McGraw-Hill, Health Professions Division, New York
Pilu G, Nicolaides KH (1999) Diagnosis of fetal abnormalities: the 18–23-week scan. Parthenon, New York
Guihard-Costa AM, Larroche JC (1992) Growth velocity of some fetal parameters. I. Brain weight and brain dimensions. Biol Neonate 62(5):309–316
Guihard-Costa AM, Larroche JC, Droulle P, Narcy F (1995) Fetal biometry. Growth charts for practical use in fetopathology and antenatal ultrasonography. Introduction. Fetal Diagn Ther 10(4):211–278
Tilea B, Alberti C, Adamsbaum C et al (2009) Cerebral biometry in fetal magnetic resonance imaging: new reference data. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 33(2):173–181. doi:10.1002/uog.6276
Reichel TF, Ramus RM, Caire JT, Hynan LS, Magee KP, Twickler DM (2003) Fetal central nervous system biometry on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180(4):1155–1158
Garel C (2004) The role of MRI in the evaluation of the fetal brain with an emphasis on biometry, gyration and parenchyma. Pediatr Radiol 34(9):694–699. doi:10.1007/s00247-004-1249-x
Garel C (2005) Fetal cerebral biometry: normal parenchymal findings and ventricular size. Eur Radiol 15(4):809–813. doi:10.1007/s00330-004-2610-z
Parazzini C, Righini A, Rustico M, Consonni D, Triulzi F (2008) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks. Neuroradiology 50(10):877–883. doi:10.1007/s00234-008-0421-7
Garel C (2004) MRI of the fetal brain. Normal development and cerebral pathologies. Springer, Berlin
Abortion laws in Europe. Available at: http://www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/feb2007/abortion_europe.html
Watanabe Y, Abe S, Takagi K, Yamamoto T, Kato T (2005) Evolution of subarachnoid space in normal fetuses using magnetic resonance imaging. Prenat Diagn 25(13):1217–1222. doi:10.1002/pd.1315
Goldstein I, Reece EA, Pilu G, Bovicelli L, Hobbins JC (1987) Cerebellar measurements with ultrasonography in the evaluation of fetal growth and development. Am J Obstet Gynecol 156(5):1065–1069. doi:0002-9378(87)90111-6
Hill LM, Guzick D, Fries J, Hixson J, Rivello D (1990) The transverse cerebellar diameter in estimating gestational age in the large for gestational age fetus. Obstet Gynecol 75(6):981–985
Griffiths PD, Wilkinson ID, Variend S, Jones A, Paley MN, Whitby E (2004) Differential growth rates of the cerebellum and posterior fossa assessed by post mortem magnetic resonance imaging of the fetus: implications for the pathogenesis of the chiari 2 deformity. Acta Radiol 45(2):236–242
Conflicts of interest
We declare that we have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Canto Moreira, N., Teixeira, J., Themudo, R. et al. Measurements of the normal fetal brain at gestation weeks 17 to 23: a MRI study. Neuroradiology 53, 43–48 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0772-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0772-8