Skip to main content

Theoretical Study of Molecular Transport Through a Permeabilized Cell Membrane in a Microchannel

Abstract

A two-dimensional model is developed to study the molecular transport into an immersed cell in a microchannel and to investigate the effects of finite boundary (a cell is suspended in a microchannel), amplitude of electric pulse, and geometrical parameter (microchannel height and size of electrodes) on cell uptake. Embedded electrodes on the walls of the microchannel generate the required electric pulse to permeabilize the cell membrane, pass the ions through the membrane, and transport them into the cell. The shape of electric pulses is square with the time span of 6 ms; their intensities are in the range of 2.2, 2.4, 2.6, 3 V. Numerical simulations have been performed to comprehensively investigate the molecular uptake into the cell. The obtained results of the current study demonstrate that calcium ions enter the cell from the anodic side (the side near positive electrode); after a while, the cell faces depletion of the calcium ions on a positive electrode-facing side within the microchannel; the duration of depletion depends on the amplitude of electric pulse and geometry that lasts from microseconds to milliseconds. By keeping geometrical parameters and time span constant, increment of a pulse intensity enhances molecular uptake and rate of propagation inside the cell. If a ratio of electrode size to cell diameter is larger than 1, the transported amount of Ca 2+ into the cell, as well as the rate of propagation, will be significantly increased. By increasing the height of the microchannel, the rate of uptake is decreased. In an infinite domain, the peak concentration becomes constant after reaching the maximum value; this value depends on the intra–extracellular conductivity and diffusion coefficient of interior and exterior domains of the cell. In comparison, the maximum concentration is changed by geometrical parameters in the microchannel. After reaching the maximum value, the peak concentration reduces due to the depletion of Ca 2+ ions within the microchannel. Electrophoretic velocity has a significant effect on the cell uptake.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

References

  • Abidor IG, Arakelyan VB, Chernomordik LV, Chizmadzhev Yu A, Pastushenko VF, Tarasevich MP (1979) Electric breakdown of bilayer lipid membranes: I. The main experimental facts and their qualitative discussion. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 104:37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bürgel SC, Escobedo C, Haandbæk N, Hierlemann A (2015) On-chip electroporation and impedance spectroscopy of single-cells. Sens Actuators B 210:82–90. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2014.12.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao Y et al (2008) Study of high-throughput cell electrofusion in a microelectrode-array chip. Microfluid Nanofluidics 5:669–675

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casciola M, Tarek M (2016) A molecular insight into the electro-transfer of small molecules through electropores driven by electric fields. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) Biomembranes 1858:2278–2289

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W, Klauke N, Smith G, Cooper JM (2010) Microfluidic cell arrays for metabolic monitoring of stimulated cardiomyocytes. Electrophoresis 31:1405–1413

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke M, McNEIL PL (1992) Syringe loading introduces macromolecules into living mammalian cell cytosol. J Cell Sci 102:533–541

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruin KA, Krassowska W (1999a) Modeling electroporation in a single cell. I. Effects of field strength and rest potential. Biophys J 77:1213–1224

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeBruin KA, Krassowska W (1999b) Modeling electroporation in a single cell. II. Effects of ionic concentrations. Biophys J 77:1225–1233

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dill K, Bromberg S (2010) Molecular driving forces: statistical thermodynamics in biology, chemistry, physics, and nanoscience. Garland Science, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Doherty GJ, McMahon HT (2009) Mechanisms of endocytosis. Annu Rev Biochem 78:857–902

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont E, Prochiantz A, Joliot A (2015) Penetratin story: an overview. In: Langel Ü (ed) Cell-penetrating peptides methods in molecular biology, 1324th edn. Springer, New York, pp 29–37. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2806-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel B, Teissié J (1999) Time courses of mammalian cell electropermeabilization observed by millisecond imaging of membrane property changes during the pulse. Biophys J 76:2158–2165

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gothelf A, Mir LM, Gehl J (2003) Electrochemotherapy: results of cancer treatment using enhanced delivery of bleomycin by electroporation. Cancer Treat Rev 29:371–387

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hapala I (1997) Breaking the barrier: methods for reversible permeabilization of cellular membranes. Crit Rev Biotechnol 17:105–122

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ho Y-P, Leong KW (2010) Quantum dot-based theranostics. Nanoscale 2:60–68

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ikeda N, Tanaka N, Yanagida Y, Hatsuzawa T (2007) On-chip single-cell lysis for extracting intracellular material. Jpn J Appl Phys 46:6410

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi RP, Nguyen A, Sridhara V, Hu Q, Nuccitelli R, Beebe SJ, Kolb J, Schoenbach KH (2007) Simulations of intracellular calcium release dynamics in response to a high-intensity, ultrashort electric pulse. Phys Rev E. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.75.041920

  • Kaner A, Braslavsky I, Rubinsky B (2014) Model of pore formation in a single cell in a flow-through channel with micro-electrodes. Biomed Microdevice 16:181–189

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khine M, Ionescu-Zanetti C, Blatz A, Wang L-P, Lee LP (2007) Single-cell electroporation arrays with real-time monitoring and feedback control. Lab Chip 7:457–462

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krassowska W, Filev PD (2007) Modeling electroporation in a single cell. Biophys J 92:404–417

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee WG, Demirci U, Khademhosseini A (2009) Microscale electroporation: challenges and perspectives for clinical applications. Integr Biol 1:242–251

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine ZA, Vernier PT (2010) Life cycle of an electropore: field-dependent and field-independent steps in pore creation and annihilation. J Membr Biol 236:27–36

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Lin H (2010) The current-voltage relation for electropores with conductivity gradients. Biomicrofluidics 4:013206

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Lin H (2011) Numerical simulation of molecular uptake via electroporation. Bioelectrochemistry 82:10–21

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Tan W, Yu M, Lin H (2013) The effect of extracellular conductivity on electroporation-mediated molecular delivery. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) -Biomembranes 1828:461–470

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodish H (2008) Molecular cell biology. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Longsine-Parker W, Wang H, Koo C, Kim J, Kim B, Jayaraman A, Han A (2013) Microfluidic electro-sonoporation: a multi-modal cell poration methodology through simultaneous application of electric field and ultrasonic wave. Lab Chip 13:2144–2152

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazari E, Zhao X, Migeotte I, Collignon J, Gosse C, Perea-Gomez A (2014) A microdevice to locally electroporate embryos with high efficiency and reduced cell damage. Development 141:2349–2359

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Movahed S, Li D (2011) Microfluidics cell electroporation. Microfluid Nanofluidics 10:703–734

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Movahed S, Li D (2012) Electrokinetic transport through the nanopores in cell membrane during electroporation. J Colloid Interface Sci 369:442–452

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Movahed S, Li D (2013) A theoretical study of single-cell electroporation in a microchannel. J Membr Biol 246:151–160

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Movahed S, Bazargan-Lari Y, Daneshmad F, Mashhoodi M (2014) Numerical modeling of bi-polar (AC) pulse electroporation of single cell in microchannel to create nanopores on its membrane. J Membr Biol 247:1229–1237

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neu JC, Krassowska W (1999) Asymptotic model of electroporation. Phys Rev E 59:3471

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neu WK, Neu JC (2009) Theory of electroporation. Cardiac Bioelectric Therapy. Springer, New York, pp 133–161

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider P (1982) Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1:841

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Puc M, Kotnik T, Mir LM, Miklavčič D (2003) Quantitative model of small molecules uptake after in vitro cell electropermeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 60:1–10

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundararajan R (2008) Nanosecond electroporation: another look. Mol Biotechnol 41:69–82. doi:10.1007/s12033-008-9107-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarek M (2005) Membrane electroporation: a molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys J 88:4045–4053

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Tieleman DP, Leontiadou H, Mark AE, Marrink SJ (2003) Molecular dynamics simulation of pore formation in phospholipid bilayers by mechanical force and electric fields. J Am Chem Soc. doi:10.1021/ja029504i

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valero A, Post J, Van Nieuwkasteele J, Ter Braak P, Kruijer W, Van Den Berg A (2008) Gene transfer and protein dynamics in stem cells using single cell electroporation in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 8:62–67

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wei Z, Li X, Zhao D, Yan H, Hu Z, Liang Z, Li Z (2014) Flow-through cell electroporation microchip integrating dielectrophoretic viable cell sorting. Anal Chem 86:10215–10222

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zaharoff DA, Henshaw JW, Mossop B, Yuan F (2008) Mechanistic analysis of electroporation-induced cellular uptake of macromolecules. Exp Biol Med 233:94–105

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y et al (2008) Zeta potential: a surface electrical characteristic to probe the interaction of nanoparticles with normal and cancer human breast epithelial cells. Biomed Microdevice 10:321–328

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeid Movahed, Dongqing Li, (2011) Microfluidics cell electroporation. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 10 (4):703-734

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Movahed.

Appendix: The Effect of Electroosmotic Flow on Molecular Uptake

Appendix: The Effect of Electroosmotic Flow on Molecular Uptake

Here we present a brief concept of neglect of electrophoresis for mass transport. Firstly, we are simulated Li and Lin’s model by our method and validate with their procedure;. From the literature (Li and Lin 2011), the electroosmotic flow is induced by the charged surface and its velocity can be found by

$$U_{\text{eo}} = \frac{{ - \varepsilon \varsigma E_{\text{t}} }}{\mu },$$

where ε, μ, E t, and ζ are the permittivity, viscosity, tangential field, and zeta potential, respectively.

Also, they calculate the electrophoretic velocity in one-dimensional argument to simplify and their calculations were limited in axial vector where E x. Therefore, the axial electrophoretic velocity is given by

$$U_{\text{ep}} = wFzE_{x}.$$

The importance of influence of flows can be compared by estimating the ratio of the two velocities:

$$\frac{{U_{\text{eo}} }}{{U_{\text{ep}} }} = \frac{ - \varepsilon \varsigma }{\mu wFz}.$$

Regards to Li and Lin 2011 and Zhang et al. 2008 (Zhang et al. 2008), the zeta potential of mammalian cell is in the value range of 20–30 mV. By using these article values, ɛ = 6.9 × 10−10 F/m, μ = 10−3 kg/m s, \(\omega_{{Ca^{2 + } }} = 3.2 \times 10^{ - 13} {\text{mol}} \,{\text{s/kg}},\) and Z = +2, the resulting ratio is 0.2–0.3. Consequently, the electroosmotic transport does not have significant impact on mass transfer in comparison with electrophoretic transport.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahboubi, M., Movahed, S., Hosseini Abardeh, R. et al. Theoretical Study of Molecular Transport Through a Permeabilized Cell Membrane in a Microchannel. J Membrane Biol 250, 285–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-017-9961-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-017-9961-2

Keywords

  • Electroporation
  • Electropermeabilization
  • Cell membrane
  • Cell uptake
  • Pore
  • Electrokinetic