Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study of bubble behaviors and heat transfer coefficient on hot steel balls during deionized water pool boiling

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, deionized water pool boiling experiments were performed on austenitic stainless steel AISI 304 steel balls with different initial temperatures. The disturbance and rupture of the vapor film during the quenching process are obtained by a high-speed camera. The temperature profile of the steel ball center during cooling was obtained by thermocouple temperature measurement. Based on the inverse heat conduction method, the inverse heat transfer program was independently developed to solve the surface temperature of the steel ball, the interfacial heat transfer coefficient and the heat flux. The results show that there is no film boiling when the steel ball temperature is 650 °C. There are four stages of film boiling, transition boiling, nucleate boiling and natural convection when the steel ball temperature is between 700 and 1000 °C. The thickness of the vapor film increases with the increase of the initial quenching temperature. At an initial temperature of 1000 °C, the thickness of the vapor film in the equatorial direction is 3.5 to 3.6 mm. With the increase of the initial temperature, the duration and rupture time of the vapor film were prolonged, and the central and boundary LFP temperatures gradually decreased. When the initial temperature is between 700 ~ 1000 °C, the vapor film lasts about 6.5 ~ 32.1 s, and the LFP temperatures at the center are between 612.3 °C and 514.7 °C, respectively. When the initial temperature is 650 °C, the maximum IHTC value is about 11,700 W/(m2·℃), and the critical heat flux is 1545.85 kW/m2. As the initial temperature is 1000 °C, the maximum IHTC value is about 14,900 W/(m2·°C), and the critical heat flux is 1508.43 kW/m2.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  1. Kumar N, Raza MQ, Raj R (2018) Surfactant aided bubble departure during pool boiling. Int J Therm Sci 131:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Song G, Davies PA, Wen J et al (2018) Nucleate pool boiling heat transfer of SES36 fluid on nanoporous surfaces obtained by electrophoretic deposition of Al2O3. Appl Therm Eng 141:143–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.12.068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhao J, fu, (2010) Two-phase flow and pool boiling heat transfer in microgravity. Int J Multiph Flow 36:135–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Xu ZG, Qin J, Ma XF (2021) Experimental and numerical investigation on bubble behaviors and pool boiling heat transfer of semi-modified copper square pillar arrays. Int J Therm Sci 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106680

  5. Ciloglu D, Bolukbasi A (2011) The quenching behavior of aqueous nanofluids around rods with high temperature. Nucl Eng Des 241:2519–2527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kim H, DeWitt G, McKrell T et al (2009) On the quenching of steel and zircaloy spheres in water-based nanofluids with alumina, silica and diamond nanoparticles. Int J Multiph Flow 35:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2009.02.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yang G, Zhang W, Binama M et al (2023) Review on bubble dynamic of subcooled flow boiling-part b: Behavior and models. Int J Therm Sci 184:108026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2022.108026

  8. Pattanayak B, Gupta AK, Kothadia HB (2022) Critical heat flux and bubble behaviour study on differently oriented flat plates during pool boiling. Nucl Eng Des 400:112079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.112079

  9. Venkitesh V, Dash S (2023) Enhancement of quenching heat transfer performance through destabilization of vapor film. Int J Heat Mass Transf 204:123851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.123851

  10. Khomutov N, Oparin A, Piskunov M, Yan WM (2020) Cooling of the hot steel balls by salt –water solutions and water-based suspensions: Subcooled pool boiling experiments. Int J Therm Sci 148:106164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2019.106164

  11. Fu P, Zhou P, Zhao T et al (2020) Study of the heat transfer coefficient of a nickel-based superalloy in the end-quench test with air. Int J Therm Sci 155:106416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2020.106416

  12. Li S, Tan S, Xu C, Gao P (2015) Visualization study of bubble behavior in a subcooled flow boiling channel under rolling motion. Ann Nucl Energy 76:390–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2014.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Okawa T, Yamagata K, Umehara Y (2020) Measurement of heat transfer coefficient profile during quenching of a vertical hot wall with a falling liquid film. Nucl Eng Des 363:110629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2020.110629

  14. Wang Z, Zhong M, Deng J et al (2021) Experimental investigation on the transient film boiling heat transfer during quenching of FeCrAl. Ann Nucl Energy 150:107842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107842

  15. Bouissa Y, Shahriari D, Champliaud H, Jahazi M (2019) Prediction of heat transfer coefficient during quenching of large size forged blocks using modeling and experimental validation. Case Stud Therm Eng 13:100379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2018.100379

  16. Gao T, Ying L, Dai M et al (2019) A comparative study of temperature-dependent interfacial heat transfer coefficient prediction methods for 22MnB5 steel in spray quenching process. Int J Therm Sci 139:36–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2018.12.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sajjad U, Sadeghianjahromi A, Ali HM, Wang CC (2020) Enhanced pool boiling of dielectric and highly wetting liquids - a review on enhancement mechanisms. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 119:104950. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2020.104950

  18. Fu BR, Ho YH, Ho MX, Pan C (2016) Quenching characteristics of a continuously-heated rod in natural sea water. Int J Heat Mass Transf 95:206–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.11.093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kangude P, Srivastava A (2020) Understanding the growth mechanism of single vapor bubble on a hydrophobic surface: Experiments under nucleate pool boiling regime. Int J Heat Mass Transf 154:119775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2020.119775

  20. Mahmoud MM, Karayiannis TG (2023) Bubble growth on a smooth metallic surface at atmospheric and sub-atmospheric pressure. Int J Heat Mass Transf 209:124103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2023.124103

  21. Pattanayak B, Kumar Gupta A, Kothadia HB (2022) Bubble behaviour and Critical heat flux on circular tubes during pool boiling process. Nucl Eng Des 391:111741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2022.111741

  22. Ning L, Zou L, Li Z, Li H (2022) Wetting Layer Evolution and Interfacial Heat Transfer in Water-Air Spray Cooling Process of Hot Metallic Surface. Therm Sci 26:3729–3740. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI210615318N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ning L, Luo S, Li Z et al (2022) Research on the heat transfer characteristics of air-atomized water spray cooling by experiment and inverse heat conduction method. Heat Mass Transf 58:1247–1262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-021-03172-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Moffat RJ (1982) Contributions to the theory of single-sample uncertainty analysis. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 104:250–258. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3241818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li H, Zhao G, He L, Mu Y (2008) High-speed data acquisition of the cooling curves and evaluation of heat transfer coefficient in quenching process. Meas J Int Meas Confed 41:676–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2007.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H, He L, Zhang C, Cui H (2015) Research on the effect of boundary pressure on the boundary heat transfer coefficients between hot stamping die and boron steel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.07.102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Huiping L, Guoqun Z, Shanting N, Yiguo L (2006) Inverse heat conduction analysis of quenching process using finite-element and optimization method. Finite Elem Anal Des 42:1087–1096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2006.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hsu SH, Ho YH, Ho MX et al (2015) On the formation of vapor film during quenching in de-ionized water and elimination of film boiling during quenching in natural sea water. Int J Heat Mass Transf 86:65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52175342), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR2021ME129) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52005304).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huiping Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ning, L., Sun, Y., Liu, X. et al. Experimental study of bubble behaviors and heat transfer coefficient on hot steel balls during deionized water pool boiling. Heat Mass Transfer 59, 2311–2322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-023-03419-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-023-03419-y

Navigation