Abstract
The thermal phenomenon of flow boiling in the helical coil is compelling due to the secondary flow. This work presents a pioneer experimental investigation of pressure drop during flow boiling in the helical coil using water under subatmospheric pressure conditions. The test section is made of SS-304, length 5330 mm, coil diameter 282.7 mm, and tube diameter 9.5 mm. The experiments are performed at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75 and 1 bar absolute pressure at the exit of the helical coil. The mass flux is varied from 140 to 425 kg/m2s, and vapor quality from 0 to 0.9. The effect of system pressure, accompanying mass flux, quality and heat flux on two-phase pressure drop has been studied. The two-phase pressure drop at the subatmospheric system pressure is higher than that at the atmospheric system pressure for identical operating conditions. The two-phase pressure drop in the helical coil is higher for maximum mass flux at higher vapor quality and lower subatmospheric pressure. The two-phase pressure drop in the helical coil increases linearly by increasing the heat flux at all subatmospheric system pressure. The pressure fluctuations are not affected significantly by the mass flux and heat flux in the saturated region. Experimental subatmospheric and atmospheric pressure drop data are compared with available correlations. The available correlations predict the atmospheric and subatmospheric pressure drop data with reasonable accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data can be shared upon request to the corresponding author.
Abbreviations
- D :
-
Coil diameter (mm)
- d :
-
Tube diameter (mm)
- G :
-
Mass flux (kg/m2s)
- Q :
-
Heat supplied (kW)
- q’’ :
-
Heat flux (kW/m2)
- L :
-
Heated length of coil (mm)
- T :
-
Temperature (°C)
- ΔP :
-
Pressure drop (kPa)
- H :
-
Enthalpy (J/kg)
- x :
-
Quality of steam
- μ :
-
Viscosity (Pa-s)
- ρ :
-
Density (kg/m3)
- α :
-
Void fraction
- X :
-
Lockhart Martinelli parameter
- \(\dot{m}\) :
-
Mass flow rate (kg/s)
- f :
-
Fanning friction factor
- C p :
-
Specific heat (J/kgK)
- z :
-
Axial length (mm)
- U :
-
Voltage (V)
- I :
-
Current (A)
- ACC:
-
Air-cooled condenser
- DPT:
-
Differential Pressure transmitter
- PT:
-
Pressure transmitter
- HTC:
-
Heat transfer coefficient
- RTD:
-
Resistance temperature detector
- PD:
-
Pressure drop
- Re :
-
Reynolds number, \(Re= \frac{4\dot{m}}{\pi d\mu }\)
- Dn :
-
Dean number, \(Re\sqrt{\frac{d}{D}}\)
- Ja :
-
Jacob number, \(\frac{{C}_{p}({T}_{w}-{T}_{sat})}{{H}_{fg}}\)
- Bo :
-
Boiling number, \({q}^{\prime\prime}/\left(G{H}_{fg}\right)\)
- acc :
-
Acceleration
- gra :
-
Gravity
- abs :
-
Absolute
- tt :
-
Turbulent - Turbulent
- cr :
-
Critical
- sp :
-
Single-phase
- tp :
-
Two-phase
- sb :
-
Subcooled
- fri :
-
Friction
- c :
-
Curved
- h :
-
Homogeneous
- l :
-
Liquid
- fg :
-
Liquid to gas
- g :
-
Gas
- sat :
-
Saturated
- w :
-
Wall
- in :
-
Inlet
- out :
-
Outlet
- sys :
-
System
- s :
-
Supplied
- loss :
-
Heat loss to atmosphere
References
Park Y, Park HK, Pusey A, Hong J, Park J, Chung BJ, Kim H (2019) Heat transfer augmentation in two-phase flow heat exchanger using porous microstructures and a hydrophobic coating. Appl Therm Eng 153:433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.03.030
Kong R, Asanakham A, Deethayat T, Kiatsiriroat T (2019) Heat transfer characteristics of deionized water-based graphene nanofluids in helical coiled heat exchanger for waste heat recovery of combustion stack gas. Heat Mass Transf Und Stoffuebertragung 55:385–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00231-018-2421-4/FIGURES/11
Hardik BK, Prabhu SV (2017) Boiling PD and local heat transfer distribution of helical coils with water at low pressure. Int J Therm Sci 114:44–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJTHERMALSCI.2016.12.004
Mansouri M, Zamzamian SAH (2021) Experimental studies on the heat transfer characteristics of alumina/water nanofluid inside a helical coil tube. Heat Mass Transf Und Stoffuebertragung 57:551–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00231-020-02976-W/FIGURES/13
Colgan N, Bottini JL, Martínez-Cuenca R, Brooks CS (2019) Experimental study of critical heat flux in flow boiling under subatmospheric pressure in a vertical square channel. Int J Heat Mass Transf 130:514–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.10.082
Shahzad MW, Myat A, Chun WG, Ng KC (2013) Bubble-assisted film evaporation correlation for saline water at sub-atmospheric pressures in horizontal-tube evaporator. Appl Therm Eng 50:670–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2012.07.003
Cioncolini A, Santini L (2016) Two-phase PD prediction in helically coiled steam generators for nuclear power applications. Int J Heat Mass Transf 100:825–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHEATMASSTRANSFER.2016.05.027
Xiao Y, Hu Z, Chen S, Gu H (2018) Experimental study of two-phase frictional PD of steam-water in helically coiled tubes with small coil diameters at high pressure. Appl Therm Eng 132:18–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2017.12.074
Guo L, Feng Z, Chen X (2001) An experimental investigation of the frictional PD of steam-water two-phase flow in helical coils. Int J Heat Mass Transf 44:2601–2610. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(00)00312-4
Awwad A, Xin RC, Dong ZF, Ebadian MA, Soliman HM (1995) Measurement and correlation of the PD in air-water two-phase flow in horizontal helicoidal pipes. Int J Multiph Flow 21:607–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-9322(95)00011-L
Santini L, Cioncolini A, Lombardi C, Ricotti M (2008) Two-phase PDs in a helically coiled steam generator. Int J Heat Mass Transf 51:4926–4939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.02.034
Hardik BK, Prabhu SV (2018) Two-phase PD in a helical coil flow boiling system. Heat Mass Transf 54:3231–3251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2362-y
Kockum H, Jernqvist Å (1998) Boiling vertical two-phase flow at sub-atmospheric pressures. Int J Heat Mass Transf 41:2909–2924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0017-9310(98)00020-9
Kuo CJ, Peles Y (2009) Pressure effects on flow boiling instabilities in parallel microchannels. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.06.015
Hu X, Lin G, Cai Y, Wen D (2011) Experimental study of flow boiling of FC-72 in parallel minichannels under sub-atmospheric pressure. Appl Therm Eng 31:3839–3853. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2011.07.032
Hu X, Lin G, Bu X, Cai Y, Wen D (2013) Flow boiling heat transfer in micro-channel heat sinks under sub-atmospheric pressures. Exp Heat Transf 26:85–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/08916152.2011.642930
Stone JR (1971) Subcooled and new boiling heat transfer to low pressure water in electrically heated tubes. NASA TN D-6402
Barbosa JR, Cheah LW, Hewitt GF (2007) Flow boiling of water in a vertical tube at sub-atmospheric pressures. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng 29:401–409. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1678-58782007000400009
Li X, Hibiki T (2017) Frictional PD correlation for two-phase flows in mini and micro single-channels. Int J Multiph Flow 90:29–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMULTIPHASEFLOW.2016.12.003
Itō H (1959) Friction Factors for turbulent flow in curved pipes. J Basic Eng 81:123–132. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4008390
Kubair V, Varrier CBS (1961) PD for liquid flow in helical coils. Trans Indian Inst Chem Eng 62:93–97
Srinivasan PS, Nandapurkar SS, Holland SS (1970) Friction factors for coils. Trans Inst Chem Eng 48:156–161
Baburajan PK, Bisht GS, Gupta SK, Prabhu SV (2013) Measurement of subcooled boiling PD and local heat transfer coefficient in horizontal tube under LPLF conditions. Nucl Eng Des 255:169–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NUCENGDES.2012.10.012
Colombo M, Colombo LPM, Cammi A, Ricotti ME (2015) A scheme of correlation for frictional PD in steam–water two-phase flow in helicoidal tubes. Chem Eng Sci 123:460–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CES.2014.11.032
Kumar A, Hardik BK (2022) Heat transfer distribution and pressure fluctuations during flow boiling in a pipe with different orientations. Appl Therm Eng 201:117822. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APPLTHERMALENG.2021.117822
Acknowledgements
The authors are thankful to Mr. Laxmikant Dhruw and Mr. Bikash Pattanayak for their assistance in the experimentations. The authors are thankful to Mr. Bharat and Mr. Vikram, the technical staff, central fabrication facility for their kind support in the fabrication of the experimental setup. This research is backed by Grant number S/TSET/HBK/20180033.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Test set-up preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Arvind Kumar, Vivek Saxena, and Harsh Deswal. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Arvind Kumar and Vivek Saxena and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
Author Hardik B. Kothadia has received research support from Thermax SPX Energy Technologies Limited. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• Effect of subatmospheric system pressure on two-phase pressure drop.
• Comparison of subatmospheric pressure drop data with available correlations.
• Higher pressure drop at higher vapor quality and lower subatmospheric pressure.
• Pressure fluctuations during flow boiling at subatmospheric pressure.
• Linear increment in two-phase pressure drop with heat flux.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, A., Saxena, V., Deswal, H. et al. Experimental investigation of pressure drop in helical coil during flow boiling at subatmospheric pressures. Heat Mass Transfer 59, 1855–1870 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-023-03373-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-023-03373-9