Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of an electrolyte (MgSO4) on the boiling flow regime and heat transfer for water at low heat flux and low pressure

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of doping distilled water with MgSO4 on the boiling flow regime and heat transfer on a vertical surface at low pressures was experimentally determined. The experiments were performed in a sealed 20 mm x 20 mm square cross section, 300 mm long vertical pipe. Two opposing walls were made of copper and the other two walls were made of polycarbonate for flow visualization. The tube was filled to 100 mm and heat was applied at the lower end of one copper wall and cooled at the upper end. The boiling dynamics on the heated copper vertical wall and the resulting two phase flow was visualized using a high speed camera for pure distilled water and 0.1 M, 0.2 M and 0.4 M concentrations of MgSO4. The presence of MgSO4 significantly changed the boiling dynamics, with a suppression of bubble coalescence and a promotion of nucleate boiling. The two phase flow exiting the heated section changed from slug to bubbly with the addition of the MgSO4. There was a significant increase in the heat transfer coefficient with the addition of the MgSO4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

A s :

Evaporator surface area, m2

Bo :

Bond number \(\frac{D^2g\left(\rho_l-\rho_v\right)}{\sigma_l}\)

Co :

Confinement number \(\frac1{D_i}\sqrt{\frac\sigma{\left(\rho_l-\rho_v\right)g}}\)

D :

Nominal bubble diameter, m

G :

Mass flux of vapour, kg/s

h :

Heat transfer coefficient, W/m2C

\({j}_{v}^{*}\) :

Superficial vapour velocity \(G/\sqrt{\left[gD\rho_v\left(\rho_l-\rho_v\right)\right]}\)

P :

Pressure, Pa

Q in :

Heat in, W

T :

Temperature, °C

T w :

Wall temperature, °C

T s :

Saturation temperature, °C

We :

Weber number \(\frac{G^2D}{\rho_v\sigma_l}\)

References

  1. Mohamed S, Ewing D, Ching CY, Zaghlol A (2019) Low pressure boiling instabilities in a T-type thermosyphon. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 100:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tecchio C, Oliveira JLG, Paiva KV, Mantelli MBH, Galdolfi R, Ribeiro LGS (2017) Geyser boiling phenomenon in two-phase closed loop-thermosyphons. Int J Heat Mass Transf 111:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Niro A, Beretta GP (1990) Boiling regimes in a closed two-phase thermosyphon. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 33(10):2099–2110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Casarosa C, Latrofa E, Shelginski A (1983) The geyser effect in a two-phase thermosyphon. Int J Heat Mass Transf 26(6):933–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith K, Kempers R, Robinson AJ (2018) Confinement and vapor production rate influences in closed two-phase reflux thermosyphons, Part A: Flow regimes. Int J Heat Mass Transf 119:907–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Emami EMS, Noie S, Khoshnoodi M, Mosavian MTH, Kianifar A (2009) Investigation of Geyser boiling phenomenon in a two-phase closed thermosyphon. Heat Transf Eng 30:408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pabón NYL, Mera JPF, Vieira GSC, Mantelli MBH (2019) Visualization and experimental analysis of Geyser boiling phenomena in two-phase thermosyphons. Int J Heat Mass Transf 141:876–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alammar AA, Al-Mousawi FN, Al-Dadah RK, Mahmoud SM, Hood R (2018) Enhancing thermal performance of a two-phase closed thermosyphon with an internal surface roughness. J Clean Prod 185:128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Acharya A, Pise A (2017) A review on augmentation of heat transfer in boiling using surfactants/ additives. Heat Mass Transf 53:1457–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hestroni G, Zakin JL, Lin Z, Mosyak A, Pancallo EA, Rozenblit R (2001) The effect of surfactants on bubble growth, wall thermal patterns and heat transfer in pool boiling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 44:485–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng L, Mewes D, Luke A (2007) Boiling phenomena with surfactants and polymeric additives: A state-of-the-art review. Int J Heat Mass Transf 50:2744–2771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hetsroni G, Mosyak A, Pogrebnyak E, Sher I, Segal Z (2006) Bubble growth in saturated pool boiling in water and surfactant solution. Int J Multiph Flow 32:159–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Buschmann MH (2013) Nanofluids in thermosyphons and heat pipes: Overview of recent experiments and modelling approaches. Int J Therm Sci 72:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kujawskaa A, Zajaczkowskia B, Wildec LM, Buschmann MH (2019) Geyser boiling in a thermosyphon with nanofluids and surfactant solution 139:195–216

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cui Q, Chandra S, McCahan S (2003) The effect of dissolving salts in water sprays used for quenching a hot surface: Part2 – Spray Cooling. ASME J Heat Transf 125:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abdalrahman KHM, Sabariman SE (2014) Influence of salt mixture on the heat transfer during spray cooling of hot metals. Int J Heat Mass Transf 78:76–83

  17. Phong T, Nguyen PT, Hampton MA, Nguyen AV, Birkett GR (2012) The influence of gas velocity, salt type and concentration on transition concentration for bubble coalescence inhibition and gas holdup. Chem Eng Res Des 90:33–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Firouzi M, Howes T, Nguyen AV (2015) A quantitative review of the transition salt concentration for inhibiting bubble coalescence. Adv Coll Interf Sci 222:305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Guo R, Wu J, Fan H, Zhan X, Hui Y (2016) Investigation of dissolved salts on heat transfer for aluminum alloy, (2024) during spray quenching. Appl Therm Eng 107:1065–1076

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klein D, Hetsroni G, Mosyak A (2005) Heat transfer characteristics of water and APG surfactant solution in a micro-channel heat sink. Int J Multiph Flow 31:393–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alizadehdakhel A, Rahimi M, Alsairafi AA (2010) CFD modeling of flow and heat transfer in the thermosyphon. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 37(3):312–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Robbe C, Nsiampa N, Oukara A, Papy A (2014) Quantification of the uncertainties of high-speed camera measurements. Int J Metrol Qual Eng 5:201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Taitel Y, Bornea D, Dukler AE (1980) Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady upward gas-liquid flow in vertical tubes. AIChE J 26(3):345–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Holmes A, Ewing D, Ching CY, Fujisawa N (2020) Experimental study of boiling instability and occurrence of cavitation in a two phase square pipe subject to natural convection. Heat Mass Transf 56:2975–2982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quinn JJ, Sovechles JM, Finch JA, Waters KE (2014) Critical coalescence concentration of inorganic salt solutions. Miner Eng 58:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moffat RJ (1988) Describing the uncertainties in experimental results. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 1:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The support of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Y. Ching.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holmes, A., Toic, A., Ewing, D. et al. Effect of an electrolyte (MgSO4) on the boiling flow regime and heat transfer for water at low heat flux and low pressure. Heat Mass Transfer 58, 481–487 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-021-03124-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-021-03124-8

Navigation