Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental study on the viscosity of hybrid nanofluid and development of a new correlation

  • Original
  • Published:
Heat and Mass Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present experimental analysis targeted on the preparation of water based (Al2O3-SiC-TiO2) ternary hybrid nanofluids by the mistreatment of two-stage methodology. Each vol. fraction sample of ternary hybrid nanofluids consists of an equal proportion of Al2O3-SiC-TiO2 nanoparticles for this analysis. The result for the dynamic viscosity of ternary hybrid nanofluids was examined for a temperature range of 35–40 °C and within a vol. fraction range of (0.01–0.1%). Analysis extended to the morphology characterization study through SEM image, together with an EDX analysis for 0.1% vol. fraction ternary hybrid nanofluid. Furthermore, based on the supported results, a new correlation was projected for the dynamic viscosity of ternary hybrid nanofluid, and also compared with the relevant literatures. The results revealed that the rise in vol. fraction, contains a larger role in increasing the interior resistance of fluid and the low vol. fractions have a weaker result on the viscosity of ternary hybrid nanofluids. The best relative consistency was discovered within 0.1% vol. fraction and, consistent with the obtained results, the margin of deviation within the intervals of ±2.6%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ϕ:

volume fraction

ρ :

density

w:

material weight

μ:

dynamic viscosity

bf:

base fluid

Al2O3 :

aluminum oxide

SiC:

silicon carbide

TiO2 :

titanium oxide

THNF:

ternary hybrid nanofluid

SEM:

Scanning electron microscope

EDX:

Energy Dispersive X-Ray

MOD:

margin of deviation

np:

nanoparticle

T:

temperature

Dp:

diameter of the nanoparticle

References

  1. Haghighi EB, Utomo AT, Ghanbarpour M, Zavareh AIT, Nowak E, Khodabandeh R (2015) Combined effect of physical properties and convective heat transfer dynamic of nanofluids on their cooling efficiency., Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf 68:32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huminic G, Huminic A (2016) Heat transfer, and entropy generation analyses of nanofluids in helically coiled tube-in-tube heat exchangers. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf 71:118–125

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Esfe MH, Saedodin S (2014) An experimental investigation and new correlation of viscosity of ZnO–EG nanofluid at various temperatures and different solid volume fractions. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 55:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wongwises S, Dahari M (2016) Prediction of dynamic viscosity of a hybrid nano lubricant by an optimal artificial neural network. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf 76:209–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Esfe MH, Rostamian H, Sarlak MR, Rejvani M, Alirezaie A (2017) Rheological behavior characteristics of TiO2-MWCNT/10w40 hybrid nano-oil affected by temperature, concentration and shear rate: an experimental study and a neural network simulating. Phys E 94:231–240

    Google Scholar 

  6. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Rejvani M, Shahram J (2017) Experimental investigation, model development, and sensitivity analysis of rheological behavior of ZnO/10W40 nano-lubricants for automotive applications. Phys E 90:194–203

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergles AE (1998) Techniques to enhance heat transfer. In handbook of heat transfer, 3rd ed., McGraw-hill, New York, Chap. 11

  8. De A, Noni J, Garcia DE, Hotza D (2002) A modified model for the viscosity of ceramic suspensions. Ceram Int 28(7):731–735

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keblinski P, Eastman JA, Cahill DG (2005) Nanofluids for thermal transport. Mater.Today 8(6):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  10. Namburu PK, Das DK, Tanguturi KM, Vajjha RS (2009) Numerical study of turbulent flow and heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids considering variable properties. Int J Therm Sci 48(2):290–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jumpholkul C, Mahian O, Kasaeian A, Dalkilic AS, Wongwises S (2017) An experimental study to determine the maximum efficiency index in turbulent flow of SiO2/water nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transf 112:1113–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nguyen C, Desgranges F, Galanis N, Roy G, Marc T, Boucherb S, Mintsa HA (2008) Viscosity data for Al2O3-water nanofluid-hysteresis: is heat transfer enhancement using nanofluids reliable, Int. J Therm Sci 47(2):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vajjha RS (2008) Measurements of Thermophysical properties of Nanofluids and computation of heat transfer characteristics. M.S. thesis, Mech. Engineering Dept., University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks

  14. Das SK, Putra N, Thiesen P, Roetzel W (2003) Temperature dependence of thermal conductivity enhancement for nanofluids, J. Heat Transfer 125(4):567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Anoop K, Kabelac S, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Rheological and flow characteristics of nanofluids: influence of electroviscous effects and particle agglomeration. J Appl Phys 106(3):907–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kao MJ, Chang H, Wu YY, Tsung TT, Lin HM (2007) Producing aluminum oxide brake nanofluids using plasma charging system. J Chin Soc Mech Eng 28(2):123–131

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sepyani K, Afrand M, Esfe MH (2017) An experimental evaluation of the effect of ZnO nanoparticles on the rheological behavior of engine oil. J Mol Liq 236:198–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Anoop KB, Sundararajan T, Das SK (2009) Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52:2189–2195

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S (2009) Measurement of temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of TiO2–water nanofluids. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 33:706–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Namburu PK, Kulkarni DP, Misra D, Das DK (2007) Viscosity of copper oxide nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol and water mixture. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 32(2):397–402

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prasher R, Song D, Wang J, Phelan P (2006) Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implications for thermal applications. Appl Phys Lett 89(13):103–108

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chen H, Ding Y, He Y, Tan C (2007) Rheological behavior of ethylene glycol-based titania nanofluids, Chem Phys Lett 444 (4):333–337

  23. Putra N, Roetzel W, Das SK (2003) Natural convection of nanofluids. Heat Mass Transf 39:8–9

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wen D, Lin G, Vafaei S, Zhang K (2009) Review of nanofluids for heat transfer applications. Particuology 7(2):141–150

    Google Scholar 

  25. Namburu PK, Kulkarni DP, Dandekar A, Das DK (2007) Experimental investigation of viscosity and specific heat of silicon dioxide nanofluids. Micro Nano Lett, IET 2(3):67–71

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mosavian MTH, Heris SZ, Etemad SG, Esfahany MN (2010) Heat transfer enhancement by application of nano-powder. J Nanopart Res 12:2611–2619

    Google Scholar 

  27. Garg J, Poudel B, Chiesa M, Gordon JB, Ma JJ, Wang JB, Ren ZF, Kang Y.T, Ohtani H, Nanda J, McKinley GH, Chen G (2008) Enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol nanofluid. J ApplPhys 103074301

  28. Behi M, Mirmohammadi SA (2012) Investigation on thermal conductivity, viscosity, and stability of nanofluids (master of science thesis), RoyalInstitute of technology (KTH). Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  29. Esfe MH, Saedodin S, Wongwises S, Toghraie D (2015) An experimental study on the effect of diameter on thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of Fe/water nanofluids. J Therm Anal Calorim 119:1817–1824

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pak BC, Cho YI (1998) Hydrodynamic, and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Experimental heat transfer an. Int J 11(2):151–170

    Google Scholar 

  31. Brinkman HC (1952) The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J ChemPhys 20(4):571

    Google Scholar 

  32. Einstein A (1956) Investigations on the theory of the Brownian movement. Corporation, Courier

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Batchelor GK (1977) The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles, J. Fluid Mech 83(1):97–117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen H, Ding Y, He Y, Tan (2007) Rheological behavior of ethylene glycol-based titania nanofluids. Chem Phys Lett 444(4–6):333–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yao J, Han H, Hou Y, Gong E, Yin W (2016) A method of calculating the interaction energy between particles in minerals flotation. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Article ID 8430745:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yiamsawas T, Mahian O, Dalkilic AS, Kaewnai S, Wongwises S (2013) Experimental studies on the viscosity of TiO2 and Al2O3 nanoparticles suspended in a mixture of ethylene glycol and water for high- temperature applications. Appl Energy 111:40–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dalkilic AS, Küçükyıldırım BO, Eker AA, Çeb A, Tapan S, Jumpholkul C, Wongwises S (2017) Experimental investigation on the viscosity of water-CNT and antifreeze-CNT nanofluids. International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 80:47–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Recktenwald G (2006) Uncertainty Estimation and Calculation, www.me.pdx.edu/~gerry/class/ME449

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rashmi Rekha Sahoo.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sahoo, R.R. Experimental study on the viscosity of hybrid nanofluid and development of a new correlation. Heat Mass Transfer 56, 3023–3033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02915-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-020-02915-9

Keywords

Navigation