Abstract
In this research, the effect of surface roughness and concentration of solution on bubble departing frequency and nucleation site density for pool boiling of water/diethanolamine (DEA) binary solution were investigated experimentally. In this investigation, boiling heat transfer coefficient, bubble departing frequency and nucleation site density have been experimentally investigated in various concentrations and heat fluxes. Microstructured surfaces with a wide range of well-defined surface roughness were fabricated, and a heat flux between 1.5–86 kW/m2 was achieved under atmospheric conditions. The Results indicated that surface roughness and concentration of solution increase the bubble departing frequency and nucleation site density with increasing heat flux. The boiling heat transfer coefficient in mixtures of water/DEA increases with increasing concentration of DEA in water. The experimental results were compared with predictions of several used correlations in the literatures. Results showed that the boiling heat transfer coefficients of this case study are much higher than the predicted values by major existing correlations and models. The excellent agreement for bubble departing frequency found between the models of Jackob and Fritz (1966) and experimental data and also the nucleation site density were in close agreement with the model of Paul (1983) data. f bubble departure frequency, 1/s or Hz N Number of nucleation sites per area per time Rc Minimum cavity size, m Dc critical diameter, m g gravitational acceleration, m/s2 ρ density, kg/m3 T temperature, °c ΔT temperature difference, °c dd vapor bubble diameter, m hfg enthalpy of vaporization, J/kg R Roughness, μm Ja Jakob number cp specific heat, J/kg °c Pr Prandtl number Ar Archimedes number h Heat transfer coefficient, J/(m2 °c) tg time it takes to grow a bubble, s q/A heat flux (kW/m2) tw time required to heat the layer, s gc Correction coefficient of incompatible units Ra Surface roughness A heated surface area d departure ONB onset of nucleate boiling w surface wall s saturation v vapor l liquid θ groove angle (o) γ influence parameter of heating surface material σ surface tension, N/m.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Jamialahmadi M, Helalizadeh A, Müller-Steinhagen H (2004) Pool boiling heat transfer to electrolyte solutions. Int J Heat Mass Transf 47(4):729–742
Dong L, Quan X, Cheng P (2014) An experimental investigation of enhanced pool boiling heat transfer from surfaces with micro/nano-structures. Int J Heat Mass Transf 71:189–196
Xu P, Li Q, Xuan Y (2015) Enhanced boiling heat transfer on composite porous surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 80:107–114
Kim DE, Yu DI, Park SC, Kwak HJ, Ahn HS (2015) Critical heat flux triggering mechanism on micro-structured surfaces: Coalesced bubble departure frequency and liquid furnishing capability. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:1237–1247
Das S, Kumar D, Bhaumik S (2016) Experimental study of nucleate pool boiling heat transfer of water on silicon oxide nanoparticle coated copper heating surface. Appl Therm Eng 96:555–567
Goel P, Nayak AK, Kulkarni PP, Joshi JB (2017) Experimental study on bubble departure characteristics in subcooled nucleate pool boiling. Int J Multiphase Flow 89:163–176
Chen H, Chen G, Zou X, Yao Y, Gong M (2017) Experimental investigations on bubble departure diameter and frequency of methane saturated nucleate pool boiling at four different pressures. Int J Heat Mass Transf 112:662–675
Ooi ZJ, Kumar V, Bottini JL, Brooks CS (2018) Experimental investigation of variability in bubble departure characteristics between nucleation sites in subcooled boiling flow. Int J Heat Mass Transf 118:327–339
Chu K-H, Enright R, Wang EN (2012) Structured surfaces for enhanced pool boiling heat transfer. Appl Phys Lett 100(24):241603
Hamzekhani S, Falahieh MM, Akbari A (2014) Bubble departure diameter in nucleate pool boiling at saturation: pure liquids and binary mixtures. Int J Refrig 46:50–58
Kim SH, Lee GC, Kang JY, Moriyama K, Kim MH, Park HS (2015) Boiling heat transfer and critical heat flux evaluation of the pool boiling on micro structured surface. Int J Heat Mass Transf 91:1140–1147
Stutz B, Morceli CHS, Da Silva MDF, Cioulachtjian S, Bonjour J (2011) Influence of nanoparticle surface coating on pool boiling. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 35(7):1239–1249
Phan HT, Caney N, Marty P, Colasson S, Gavillet J (2009) Surface wettability control by nanocoating: the effects on pool boiling heat transfer and nucleation mechanism. Int J Heat Mass Transf 52(23–24):5459–5471
Zuber N (1959) Hydrodynamic aspects of boiling heat transfer (thesis). Ramo-Wooldridge Corp., Univ. of California, Los Angeles
Fritz W (1935) Berechnung des maximalvolume von dampfblasen. Phys Z 36:379–388
Peebles FN, Garber HJ (1953) Studies on the motion of gas bubbles in liquids. Chem Eng Prog 49:88–97
Cole R (1960) A photographic study of pool boiling in the region of the critical heat flux. AICHE J 6(4):533–538
McFadden P, Grassmann P (1962) The relation between bubble frequency and diameter during nucleate pool boiling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 5(3–4):169–173
Zuber N (1963) Nucleate boiling. The region of isolated bubbles and the similarity with natural convection. Int J Heat Mass Transf 6(1):53–78
Hatton A, Hall I (1966) Photographic study of boiling on prepared surfaces. In: Chemical Engineering Progress, vol 8. Amer Inst Chemical Engineers 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017, pp. 82-&
Ivey H (1967) Relationships between bubble frequency, departure diameter and rise velocity in nucleate boiling. Int J Heat Mass Transf 10(8):1023–1040
Stephan K (1992) Heat transfer in condensation and boiling. Springer-Verlag, New York
Lemmert M, Chawla JM (1977) Influence of flow velocity on surface boiling heat transfer coefficient. Heat Transfer in Boiling. Academic Press, Cambridge, p 237–247
Paul D, Abdel-Khalik S (1983) A statistical analysis of saturated nucleate boiling along a heated wire. Int J Heat Mass Transf 26(4):509–519
Kocamustafaogullari G, Ishii M (1983) Interfacial area and nucleation site density in boiling systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 26(9):1377–1387
Wang C, Dhir V (1993) On the gas entrapment and nucleation site density during pool boiling of saturated water. Transactions-American Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal of Heat Transfer 115:670–670
Schömann H, Luke A, Gorenflo D (1994) Size distributions of active nucleation sites with pool boiling heat transfer at single tubes with different roughnesses. l0th lnt Heat Transfer Conf Brighton 5:63–68
Chi-Yeh H, Griffith P (1965) The mechanism of heat transfer in nucleate pool boiling—part I: bubble initiaton, growth and departure. Int J Heat Mass Transf 8(6):887–904
Benjamin R, Balakrishnan A (1997) Nucleation site density in pool boiling of saturated pure liquids: effect of surface microroughness and surface and liquid physical properties. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 15(1):32–42
Basu N, Warrier GR, Dhir VK (2002) Onset of nucleate boiling and active nucleation site density during subcooled flow boiling. Transactions-American Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal of Heat Transfer 124(4):717–728
Hibiki T, Ishii M (2003) Active nucleation site density in boiling systems. Int J Heat Mass Transf 46(14):2587–2601
Fazel SA, Mahboobpour M (2013) Pool boiling heat transfer in monoethyleneglycol aqueous solutions. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 48:177–183
Jones BJ, McHale JP, Garimella SV (2009) The influence of surface roughness on nucleate pool boiling heat transfer. J Heat Transf 131(12):121009
Acknowledgments
The authors of the article are grateful for the efforts of Dr. Seyyed Ali Alavi Fazel, who have always been guided by their guidance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khoshechin, M., Salimi, F. & Jahangiri, A. The influence of surface roughness and solution concentration on pool boiling process in Diethanolamine aqueous solution. Heat Mass Transfer 54, 2963–2973 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2340-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-018-2340-4